Improvement of compliance to the Portland intensive insulin therapy during liver transplantation after introducing an application software: a retrospective single center cohort study.

Anesthesia and pain medicine Pub Date : 2022-07-01 Epub Date: 2022-07-26 DOI:10.17085/apm.22136
Young Woong Choi, Sangbin Han, Justin S Ko, Su Nam Lee, Mi Sook Gwak, Gaab Soo Kim
{"title":"Improvement of compliance to the Portland intensive insulin therapy during liver transplantation after introducing an application software: a retrospective single center cohort study.","authors":"Young Woong Choi,&nbsp;Sangbin Han,&nbsp;Justin S Ko,&nbsp;Su Nam Lee,&nbsp;Mi Sook Gwak,&nbsp;Gaab Soo Kim","doi":"10.17085/apm.22136","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Portland intensive insulin therapy effectively controls acute hyperglycemic change after graft reperfusion during liver transplantation. However, the time-consuming sophistication acts as a barrier leading to misinterpretation and decreasing compliance to the protocol; thus, we newly introduced an application software \"Insulin protocol calculator\" which automatically calculates therapeutic bolus/continuous insulin doses based on the Portland protocol.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Of 144 patients who underwent liver transplantation, 74 patients were treated before the introduction of \"Insulin protocol calculator\" by using a paper manual, and 70 patients were treated by using the application. Compliance was defined as the proportion of patients treated with exact bolus/continuous insulin dose according to the Portland protocol.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compliance was significantly greater in app group than in paper group regarding bolus dose (94.5% and 86.9%, P < 0.001), continuous dose (88.9% and 77.3%, P = 0.001), and both doses (86.6% and 73.8%, P < 0.001). Blood glucose concentration was significantly lower in app group at 3 h (125 ± 17 mg/dl vs. 136 ± 19 mg/dl, P = 0.014) and 4 h (135 ± 22 mg/dl vs. 115 ± 15 mg/dl, P = 0.029) after graft reperfusion. Acute hyperglycemic change during 30 min was more prominent in app group while hyperglycemia incidence was 71.4% vs. 54.1% (P = 0.031). However, hyperglycemia risk was comparable at 2 h (31.4% vs. 31.1%, P = 0.964), and even insignificantly lower in app group at 3 h (7.1% vs. 19.5%, P = 0.184).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Compliance to the Portland protocol was significantly improved after introducing the application software; post-reperfusion hyperglycemia was better controlled. \"Insulin protocol calculator\" is cost-effective and time-saving with potential clinical benefits.</p>","PeriodicalId":7801,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesia and pain medicine","volume":" ","pages":"312-319"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/a1/d6/apm-22136.PMC9346209.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesthesia and pain medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17085/apm.22136","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/7/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The Portland intensive insulin therapy effectively controls acute hyperglycemic change after graft reperfusion during liver transplantation. However, the time-consuming sophistication acts as a barrier leading to misinterpretation and decreasing compliance to the protocol; thus, we newly introduced an application software "Insulin protocol calculator" which automatically calculates therapeutic bolus/continuous insulin doses based on the Portland protocol.

Methods: Of 144 patients who underwent liver transplantation, 74 patients were treated before the introduction of "Insulin protocol calculator" by using a paper manual, and 70 patients were treated by using the application. Compliance was defined as the proportion of patients treated with exact bolus/continuous insulin dose according to the Portland protocol.

Results: Compliance was significantly greater in app group than in paper group regarding bolus dose (94.5% and 86.9%, P < 0.001), continuous dose (88.9% and 77.3%, P = 0.001), and both doses (86.6% and 73.8%, P < 0.001). Blood glucose concentration was significantly lower in app group at 3 h (125 ± 17 mg/dl vs. 136 ± 19 mg/dl, P = 0.014) and 4 h (135 ± 22 mg/dl vs. 115 ± 15 mg/dl, P = 0.029) after graft reperfusion. Acute hyperglycemic change during 30 min was more prominent in app group while hyperglycemia incidence was 71.4% vs. 54.1% (P = 0.031). However, hyperglycemia risk was comparable at 2 h (31.4% vs. 31.1%, P = 0.964), and even insignificantly lower in app group at 3 h (7.1% vs. 19.5%, P = 0.184).

Conclusions: Compliance to the Portland protocol was significantly improved after introducing the application software; post-reperfusion hyperglycemia was better controlled. "Insulin protocol calculator" is cost-effective and time-saving with potential clinical benefits.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

引入应用软件后肝移植期间波特兰强化胰岛素治疗依从性的改善:一项回顾性单中心队列研究
背景:波特兰强化胰岛素治疗可有效控制肝移植再灌注后的急性高血糖改变。然而,耗时的复杂性成为导致误解和降低对协议的遵守的障碍;因此,我们新推出了一款应用软件“胰岛素方案计算器”,它可以根据波特兰方案自动计算治疗丸/连续胰岛素剂量。方法:144例肝移植患者中,74例患者在引入“胰岛素方案计算器”前采用纸质手册进行治疗,70例患者采用应用程序进行治疗。依从性定义为根据波特兰方案接受精确的胰岛素丸/连续剂量治疗的患者比例。结果:应用程序组在丸给药(94.5%和86.9%,P < 0.001)、连续给药(88.9%和77.3%,P = 0.001)和两种给药(86.6%和73.8%,P < 0.001)方面的依从性均显著高于纸给药组。app组在移植物再灌注后3 h(125±17 mg/dl比136±19 mg/dl, P = 0.014)和4 h(135±22 mg/dl比115±15 mg/dl, P = 0.029)血糖浓度显著降低。app组30min急性高血糖变化更明显,高血糖发生率分别为71.4%和54.1% (P = 0.031)。然而,在2 h时,app组的高血糖风险相当(31.4%比31.1%,P = 0.964),甚至在3 h时,app组的高血糖风险更低(7.1%比19.5%,P = 0.184)。结论:引入应用软件后,患者对Portland协议的依从性明显提高;再灌注后高血糖得到较好控制。“胰岛素方案计算器”具有成本效益和节省时间的潜在临床效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信