Acceptability of Second-Line Antidepressant Medications Using Filled Prescription Sequences in a Nationwide Cohort Study.

Charles Ouazana-Vedrines, Thomas Lesuffleur, Pierre Denis, Nicolas Hoertel, Romain Olekhnovitch, Mark Olfson, Carlos Blanco, Frédéric Limosin, Antoine Rachas, Philippe Tuppin, Cédric Lemogne
{"title":"Acceptability of Second-Line Antidepressant Medications Using Filled Prescription Sequences in a Nationwide Cohort Study.","authors":"Charles Ouazana-Vedrines,&nbsp;Thomas Lesuffleur,&nbsp;Pierre Denis,&nbsp;Nicolas Hoertel,&nbsp;Romain Olekhnovitch,&nbsp;Mark Olfson,&nbsp;Carlos Blanco,&nbsp;Frédéric Limosin,&nbsp;Antoine Rachas,&nbsp;Philippe Tuppin,&nbsp;Cédric Lemogne","doi":"10.4088/JCP.21m14248","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Although about half of patients do not respond to a first-line antidepressant medication, there is no consensus on the best second-line option. The aim of this nationwide population-based study was to rank antidepressants according to their relative acceptability (ie, efficacy and tolerability) using filled prescription sequences after failure of first treatment.</p><p><p><b><i>Methods:</i></b> About 1.2 million people were identified as new antidepressant users in the French national health data system in 2011. The inclusion criterion was having at least 2 filled prescriptions of a second-line treatment after a filled prescription of a first-line treatment, resulting in 63,726 participants. The outcome was clinical acceptability as measured by the continuation/change ratio for second-line treatment. Continuation sequence was defined as at least 2 refills of the same treatment. Change sequence was defined as at least 1 filled prescription of another antidepressant. Adjusted odds ratios (aORs) were computed through multivariable binary logistic regressions.</p><p><p><b><i>Results:</i></b> Intraclass switch had a better acceptability than interclass switch (aOR [95% CI]: 1.23 [1.20-1.28]). According to the first-line treatment, intraclass switch remained more acceptable for selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors only (1.37 [1.31-1.42]). For α<sub>2</sub> blockers and tricyclic agents, combination antidepressant therapy was the most acceptable second-line option (1.59 [1.27-2.01] and 2.53 [1.53-4.04], respectively), whereas for serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors there was no significant difference between the strategies. For other antidepressants, intraclass switch had lower acceptability than interclass switch (0.70 [0.51-0.95]).</p><p><p><b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Administrative claim databases may help with ranking acceptability of second-line treatments in real world settings and complement randomized controlled trials in informing clinicians about the most acceptable second-line options according to the first-line treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":516853,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4088/JCP.21m14248","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Although about half of patients do not respond to a first-line antidepressant medication, there is no consensus on the best second-line option. The aim of this nationwide population-based study was to rank antidepressants according to their relative acceptability (ie, efficacy and tolerability) using filled prescription sequences after failure of first treatment.

Methods: About 1.2 million people were identified as new antidepressant users in the French national health data system in 2011. The inclusion criterion was having at least 2 filled prescriptions of a second-line treatment after a filled prescription of a first-line treatment, resulting in 63,726 participants. The outcome was clinical acceptability as measured by the continuation/change ratio for second-line treatment. Continuation sequence was defined as at least 2 refills of the same treatment. Change sequence was defined as at least 1 filled prescription of another antidepressant. Adjusted odds ratios (aORs) were computed through multivariable binary logistic regressions.

Results: Intraclass switch had a better acceptability than interclass switch (aOR [95% CI]: 1.23 [1.20-1.28]). According to the first-line treatment, intraclass switch remained more acceptable for selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors only (1.37 [1.31-1.42]). For α2 blockers and tricyclic agents, combination antidepressant therapy was the most acceptable second-line option (1.59 [1.27-2.01] and 2.53 [1.53-4.04], respectively), whereas for serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors there was no significant difference between the strategies. For other antidepressants, intraclass switch had lower acceptability than interclass switch (0.70 [0.51-0.95]).

Conclusions: Administrative claim databases may help with ranking acceptability of second-line treatments in real world settings and complement randomized controlled trials in informing clinicians about the most acceptable second-line options according to the first-line treatment.

在一项全国队列研究中,使用填充处方序列的二线抗抑郁药物的可接受性。
背景:虽然约有一半的患者对一线抗抑郁药物没有反应,但对于最佳的二线选择尚无共识。这项以全国人口为基础的研究的目的是在第一次治疗失败后,根据抗抑郁药的相对可接受性(即疗效和耐受性)使用填充处方序列对抗抑郁药进行排名。方法:2011年,在法国国家健康数据系统中,约有120万人被确定为新的抗抑郁药使用者。纳入标准是在服用一线治疗处方后至少服用2份二线治疗处方,共纳入63,726名受试者。结果是通过二线治疗的持续/改变比率来衡量的临床可接受性。延续顺序定义为至少2次相同治疗的补药。改变顺序定义为至少服用1种其他抗抑郁药。通过多变量二元logistic回归计算校正优势比(aORs)。结果:班内切换的可接受性优于班间切换(aOR [95% CI]: 1.23[1.20-1.28])。根据一线治疗,仅选择性5 -羟色胺再摄取抑制剂更容易接受类内切换(1.37[1.31-1.42])。对于α2受体阻滞剂和三环类药物,联合抗抑郁治疗是最可接受的二线选择(分别为1.59[1.27-2.01]和2.53[1.53-4.04]),而对于血清素-去甲肾上腺素再摄取抑制剂,两种策略之间无显著差异。对于其他抗抑郁药物,类内切换的可接受性低于类间切换(0.70[0.51-0.95])。结论:行政索赔数据库可能有助于在现实世界中对二线治疗的可接受性进行排名,并补充随机对照试验,告知临床医生根据一线治疗最可接受的二线选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信