Retrospective evaluation of patients with cervical spinal cord stimulator.

IF 0.8 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Dostali Aliyev, Güngör Enver Özgencil
{"title":"Retrospective evaluation of patients with cervical spinal cord stimulator.","authors":"Dostali Aliyev,&nbsp;Güngör Enver Özgencil","doi":"10.14744/agri.2021.59837","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Chronic pain is a cause that negatively affects quality of life and functional capacity. Spinal cord stimulation is used for various painful indications such as failed back surgery syndrome, complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS), and peripheral vascular disease (PVD). Our aim is to retrospectively investigate the effectiveness of cervical spinal cord stimulator therapy in nine patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Nine patients with chronic pain in the upper extremity who did not benefit from medical (pharmacological, physical therapy, etc.) and algological interventional procedures (such as nerve blocks) were included in the study. Cervical spinal cord stimulator was applied to these patients in our pain clinic between January 1, 2016, and January 1, 2019. The pain levels and analgesic and antiepileptic drug doses of the patients before and after the procedure were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age of patients was 51.8±14.6% (29-76), 44.4% (4) were female and 55.6% (5) were male. Indications for cervical spinal cord stimulator insertion were CRPS type 1 (five patients), CRPS type 2 (two patients), previous neck surgery (one patient), and pain syndrome due to PVD (one patient). After the procedure, we saw a statistical decrease in the pain levels and drug doses of the study patients. SPSS 22.0 statistics package program was used to evaluate the data. NPar and Friedman tests were used for comparisons. Continuous variables are given as mean±standard deviation. p<0.05 was considered statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Cervical spinal cord stimulator is an effective method in the treatment of neck and upper extremity chronic pain.</p>","PeriodicalId":45603,"journal":{"name":"Agri-The Journal of the Turkish Society of Algology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agri-The Journal of the Turkish Society of Algology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14744/agri.2021.59837","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objectives: Chronic pain is a cause that negatively affects quality of life and functional capacity. Spinal cord stimulation is used for various painful indications such as failed back surgery syndrome, complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS), and peripheral vascular disease (PVD). Our aim is to retrospectively investigate the effectiveness of cervical spinal cord stimulator therapy in nine patients.

Methods: Nine patients with chronic pain in the upper extremity who did not benefit from medical (pharmacological, physical therapy, etc.) and algological interventional procedures (such as nerve blocks) were included in the study. Cervical spinal cord stimulator was applied to these patients in our pain clinic between January 1, 2016, and January 1, 2019. The pain levels and analgesic and antiepileptic drug doses of the patients before and after the procedure were analyzed.

Results: The mean age of patients was 51.8±14.6% (29-76), 44.4% (4) were female and 55.6% (5) were male. Indications for cervical spinal cord stimulator insertion were CRPS type 1 (five patients), CRPS type 2 (two patients), previous neck surgery (one patient), and pain syndrome due to PVD (one patient). After the procedure, we saw a statistical decrease in the pain levels and drug doses of the study patients. SPSS 22.0 statistics package program was used to evaluate the data. NPar and Friedman tests were used for comparisons. Continuous variables are given as mean±standard deviation. p<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Conclusion: Cervical spinal cord stimulator is an effective method in the treatment of neck and upper extremity chronic pain.

颈脊髓刺激器患者的回顾性评价。
目的:慢性疼痛是负面影响生活质量和功能的一个原因。脊髓刺激用于各种疼痛指征,如背部手术失败综合征、复杂区域疼痛综合征(CRPS)和周围血管疾病(PVD)。我们的目的是回顾性研究9例患者颈脊髓刺激器治疗的有效性。方法:选取9例上肢慢性疼痛患者,均未接受药物(药理、物理治疗等)和神经阻滞等外科介入治疗。这些患者于2016年1月1日至2019年1月1日在我们的疼痛门诊使用颈脊髓刺激器。分析手术前后患者疼痛程度及镇痛、抗癫痫药物剂量。结果:患者平均年龄为51.8±14.6%(29-76岁),其中女性44.4%(4岁),男性55.6%(5岁)。颈脊髓刺激器插入适应症为CRPS 1型(5例)、CRPS 2型(2例)、既往颈部手术(1例)、PVD所致疼痛综合征(1例)。手术后,我们看到研究患者的疼痛程度和药物剂量有统计学上的下降。采用SPSS 22.0统计软件包程序对数据进行评价。采用NPar和Friedman检验进行比较。连续变量以平均值±标准差表示。结论:颈脊髓刺激器是治疗颈上肢慢性疼痛的有效方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
16.70%
发文量
22
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信