Induction and inhibition of Drosophila X chromosome gene expression are both impeded by the dosage compensation complex.

IF 2.2
Richard P Meisel, Danial Asgari, Florencia Schlamp, Robert L Unckless
{"title":"Induction and inhibition of Drosophila X chromosome gene expression are both impeded by the dosage compensation complex.","authors":"Richard P Meisel,&nbsp;Danial Asgari,&nbsp;Florencia Schlamp,&nbsp;Robert L Unckless","doi":"10.1093/g3journal/jkac165","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Sex chromosomes frequently differ from the autosomes in the frequencies of genes with sexually dimorphic or tissue-specific expression. Multiple hypotheses have been put forth to explain the unique gene content of the X chromosome, including selection against male-beneficial X-linked alleles, expression limits imposed by the haploid dosage of the X in males, and interference by the dosage compensation complex on expression in males. Here, we investigate these hypotheses by examining differential gene expression in Drosophila melanogaster following several treatments that have widespread transcriptomic effects: bacterial infection, viral infection, and abiotic stress. We found that genes that are induced (upregulated) by these biotic and abiotic treatments are frequently under-represented on the X chromosome, but so are those that are repressed (downregulated) following treatment. We further show that whether a gene is bound by the dosage compensation complex in males can largely explain the paucity of both up- and downregulated genes on the X chromosome. Specifically, genes that are bound by the dosage compensation complex, or close to a dosage compensation complex high-affinity site, are unlikely to be up- or downregulated after treatment. This relationship, however, could partially be explained by a correlation between differential expression and breadth of expression across tissues. Nonetheless, our results suggest that dosage compensation complex binding, or the associated chromatin modifications, inhibit both up- and downregulation of X chromosome gene expression within specific contexts, including tissue-specific expression. We propose multiple possible mechanisms of action for the effect, including a role of Males absent on the first, a component of the dosage compensation complex, as a dampener of gene expression variance in both males and females. This effect could explain why the Drosophila X chromosome is depauperate in genes with tissue-specific or induced expression, while the mammalian X has an excess of genes with tissue-specific expression.</p>","PeriodicalId":520629,"journal":{"name":"G3 (Bethesda, Md.)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9434221/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"G3 (Bethesda, Md.)","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/g3journal/jkac165","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sex chromosomes frequently differ from the autosomes in the frequencies of genes with sexually dimorphic or tissue-specific expression. Multiple hypotheses have been put forth to explain the unique gene content of the X chromosome, including selection against male-beneficial X-linked alleles, expression limits imposed by the haploid dosage of the X in males, and interference by the dosage compensation complex on expression in males. Here, we investigate these hypotheses by examining differential gene expression in Drosophila melanogaster following several treatments that have widespread transcriptomic effects: bacterial infection, viral infection, and abiotic stress. We found that genes that are induced (upregulated) by these biotic and abiotic treatments are frequently under-represented on the X chromosome, but so are those that are repressed (downregulated) following treatment. We further show that whether a gene is bound by the dosage compensation complex in males can largely explain the paucity of both up- and downregulated genes on the X chromosome. Specifically, genes that are bound by the dosage compensation complex, or close to a dosage compensation complex high-affinity site, are unlikely to be up- or downregulated after treatment. This relationship, however, could partially be explained by a correlation between differential expression and breadth of expression across tissues. Nonetheless, our results suggest that dosage compensation complex binding, or the associated chromatin modifications, inhibit both up- and downregulation of X chromosome gene expression within specific contexts, including tissue-specific expression. We propose multiple possible mechanisms of action for the effect, including a role of Males absent on the first, a component of the dosage compensation complex, as a dampener of gene expression variance in both males and females. This effect could explain why the Drosophila X chromosome is depauperate in genes with tissue-specific or induced expression, while the mammalian X has an excess of genes with tissue-specific expression.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

果蝇X染色体基因表达的诱导和抑制都受到剂量补偿复合物的阻碍。
性染色体与常染色体在两性二态或组织特异性表达的基因频率上经常不同。为了解释X染色体独特的基因含量,人们提出了多种假说,包括对雄性有益的X连锁等位基因的选择,雄性中X的单倍体剂量对表达的限制,以及剂量补偿复合物对雄性表达的干扰。在这里,我们通过检测黑腹果蝇在几种具有广泛转录组效应的处理后的差异基因表达来研究这些假设:细菌感染、病毒感染和非生物应激。我们发现,通过这些生物和非生物处理诱导(上调)的基因在X染色体上的表现往往不足,但在治疗后被抑制(下调)的基因也是如此。我们进一步表明,一个基因是否与雄性剂量补偿复合体结合,可以在很大程度上解释X染色体上上调和下调基因的缺乏。具体来说,与剂量补偿复合物结合的基因,或接近剂量补偿复合物高亲和力位点的基因,在治疗后不太可能上调或下调。然而,这种关系可以部分解释为差异表达和跨组织表达广度之间的相关性。尽管如此,我们的研究结果表明,剂量补偿复合物结合,或相关的染色质修饰,在特定环境下抑制X染色体基因表达的上调和下调,包括组织特异性表达。我们提出了多种可能的作用机制,包括男性在剂量补偿复合体中的作用,作为男性和女性基因表达差异的抑制者。这一效应可以解释为什么果蝇X染色体中具有组织特异性或诱导表达的基因缺失,而哺乳动物X染色体中具有组织特异性表达的基因过量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书