Telebehavioral Interventions for Family Caregivers of Individuals With Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systematic Review.

Kathryn A Coxe, Chang Liu, Megan Moore
{"title":"Telebehavioral Interventions for Family Caregivers of Individuals With Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Kathryn A Coxe,&nbsp;Chang Liu,&nbsp;Megan Moore","doi":"10.1097/HTR.0000000000000587","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To identify and examine research on telebehavioral interventions that support family caregivers of individuals with traumatic brain injury (TBI).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review using the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. Studies published between 1999 and 2019 were identified through CINHAL, EMBASE, ERIC, PsycINFO, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twelve studies met inclusion criteria; 3 used quasi-experimental designs, 7 were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with 1-group comparison, 1 was RCT with a 2-group comparison, and 1 was RCT with a 3-group comparison. Outcomes primarily focused on caregiver depression, distress, self-efficacy, anxiety, stress, burden, and problem solving. Eleven studies found significant differences between the intervention and control groups on at least 1 outcome indicator, and 10 of these reported effect sizes supporting clinical significance. However, studies lacked data on caregiver and injury characteristics, and most studies lacked diverse study samples that may contribute to psychosocial outcomes. Nearly all studies demonstrated methodological bias (PEDro-P M = 5.5).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Caregiver psychosocial outcomes following telebehavioral interventions were generally positive, but caution should be used when generalizing outcomes due to lack of sample diversity. Additional research is needed to assess how caregiver demographics and injury severity moderate caregiver outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":519229,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"E535-E546"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1097/HTR.0000000000000587","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/HTR.0000000000000587","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Objective: To identify and examine research on telebehavioral interventions that support family caregivers of individuals with traumatic brain injury (TBI).

Methods: A systematic review using the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. Studies published between 1999 and 2019 were identified through CINHAL, EMBASE, ERIC, PsycINFO, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science.

Results: Twelve studies met inclusion criteria; 3 used quasi-experimental designs, 7 were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with 1-group comparison, 1 was RCT with a 2-group comparison, and 1 was RCT with a 3-group comparison. Outcomes primarily focused on caregiver depression, distress, self-efficacy, anxiety, stress, burden, and problem solving. Eleven studies found significant differences between the intervention and control groups on at least 1 outcome indicator, and 10 of these reported effect sizes supporting clinical significance. However, studies lacked data on caregiver and injury characteristics, and most studies lacked diverse study samples that may contribute to psychosocial outcomes. Nearly all studies demonstrated methodological bias (PEDro-P M = 5.5).

Conclusions: Caregiver psychosocial outcomes following telebehavioral interventions were generally positive, but caution should be used when generalizing outcomes due to lack of sample diversity. Additional research is needed to assess how caregiver demographics and injury severity moderate caregiver outcomes.

外伤性脑损伤患者家庭照顾者的远程行为干预:系统回顾。
目的:确定并检验支持创伤性脑损伤(TBI)患者家庭照顾者的远程行为干预研究。方法:采用PRISMA(系统评价和荟萃分析首选报告项目)指南进行系统评价。1999年至2019年间发表的研究通过CINHAL、EMBASE、ERIC、PsycINFO、PubMed、Scopus和Web of Science进行了鉴定。结果:12项研究符合纳入标准;3项采用准实验设计,7项为1组比较的随机对照试验(RCT), 1项为2组比较的随机对照试验(RCT), 1项为3组比较的随机对照试验(RCT)。结果主要集中在照顾者抑郁、痛苦、自我效能、焦虑、压力、负担和问题解决能力。11项研究发现干预组和对照组在至少1项结果指标上存在显著差异,其中10项研究报告的效应量支持临床意义。然而,这些研究缺乏照顾者和伤害特征的数据,而且大多数研究缺乏可能有助于社会心理结果的多样化研究样本。几乎所有的研究都存在方法学偏差(pedrop - M = 5.5)。结论:远程行为干预后的护理人员心理社会结果总体上是积极的,但由于缺乏样本多样性,在推广结果时应谨慎。需要进一步的研究来评估护理人员的人口统计学特征和伤害严重程度如何影响护理人员的预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书