Diagnostic performance and inter-observer variability of CO-RADS in the triage of patients with suspected COVID-19 infection: initial experience in Zagazig University Hospital.

IF 0.9 Q4 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Polish Journal of Radiology Pub Date : 2022-05-28 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.5114/pjr.2022.117052
Dena Abd El Aziz El Sammak, Hala M Allam, Rabab M Abdelhay
{"title":"Diagnostic performance and inter-observer variability of CO-RADS in the triage of patients with suspected COVID-19 infection: initial experience in Zagazig University Hospital.","authors":"Dena Abd El Aziz El Sammak,&nbsp;Hala M Allam,&nbsp;Rabab M Abdelhay","doi":"10.5114/pjr.2022.117052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>In many healthcare settings in developing nations, multislice computed tomography (MSCT) imaging may be the only available diagnostic modality for patients with suspected COVID-19 infection, due to a shortage of laboratory kits. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance and interobserver variability of CO-RADS (COVID-19 Reporting and Data System) in the triage of patients with suspected COVID-19 infection in Zagazig University Hospital.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>This study included 2500 patients with suspected COVID-19 infection, mean age 60.61 years ± 13.89. 61.4% were male. Unstable patients requiring urgent invasive ventilation, acute coronary syndrome patients, pregnant females, and patients with RT-PCR results available prior to MSCT were excluded from this study. RT-PCR was performed in all patients included in the study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fever and dry cough were the most common clinical symptoms, detected in 80.16% and 52.00%, respectively. The most common comorbidities were cardiovascular diseases, followed by chronic lung disease and diabetes, found in 27.36%, 22.80%, and 18.00%, respectively. Of the 1500 RT-PCR-positive patients, 40% had CO-RADS score 5, while 3.4% had CO-RADS score 1. Of the 1000 RT-PCR-negative patients, 36% had CO-RADS score 2 and 1% were scored as CO-RADS 5. There was excellent agreement in the studied patients as the weighted κ value was 0.846, which was more pronounced at CO-RADS 5 (24.40%). The sensitivity of CO-RADS was higher in the 2<sup>nd</sup> scenario (83.27% vs. 55.27%) while the specificity was higher in the 1<sup>st</sup> scenario (95% vs. 65%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The CO-RADS scoring system is a sensitive and specific method that can help in the diagnosis of COVID-19 during the peak of the COVID-19 pandemic. CO-RADS is a triage test in resource-constrained environments, assisting in the optimization of RT-PCR tests, isolation beds, and intensive care units.</p>","PeriodicalId":47128,"journal":{"name":"Polish Journal of Radiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/1b/43/PJR-87-47232.PMC9215304.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Polish Journal of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/pjr.2022.117052","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: In many healthcare settings in developing nations, multislice computed tomography (MSCT) imaging may be the only available diagnostic modality for patients with suspected COVID-19 infection, due to a shortage of laboratory kits. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance and interobserver variability of CO-RADS (COVID-19 Reporting and Data System) in the triage of patients with suspected COVID-19 infection in Zagazig University Hospital.

Material and methods: This study included 2500 patients with suspected COVID-19 infection, mean age 60.61 years ± 13.89. 61.4% were male. Unstable patients requiring urgent invasive ventilation, acute coronary syndrome patients, pregnant females, and patients with RT-PCR results available prior to MSCT were excluded from this study. RT-PCR was performed in all patients included in the study.

Results: Fever and dry cough were the most common clinical symptoms, detected in 80.16% and 52.00%, respectively. The most common comorbidities were cardiovascular diseases, followed by chronic lung disease and diabetes, found in 27.36%, 22.80%, and 18.00%, respectively. Of the 1500 RT-PCR-positive patients, 40% had CO-RADS score 5, while 3.4% had CO-RADS score 1. Of the 1000 RT-PCR-negative patients, 36% had CO-RADS score 2 and 1% were scored as CO-RADS 5. There was excellent agreement in the studied patients as the weighted κ value was 0.846, which was more pronounced at CO-RADS 5 (24.40%). The sensitivity of CO-RADS was higher in the 2nd scenario (83.27% vs. 55.27%) while the specificity was higher in the 1st scenario (95% vs. 65%).

Conclusion: The CO-RADS scoring system is a sensitive and specific method that can help in the diagnosis of COVID-19 during the peak of the COVID-19 pandemic. CO-RADS is a triage test in resource-constrained environments, assisting in the optimization of RT-PCR tests, isolation beds, and intensive care units.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

CO-RADS在疑似COVID-19感染患者分诊中的诊断性能和观察者间变异性:扎加齐格大学医院的初步经验
目的:在发展中国家的许多医疗机构中,由于实验室试剂盒短缺,多层计算机断层扫描(MSCT)成像可能是疑似COVID-19感染患者唯一可用的诊断方式。本研究旨在评估CO-RADS (COVID-19报告和数据系统)在扎加齐格大学医院COVID-19疑似感染患者分诊中的诊断性能和观察者间变异性。材料与方法:本研究纳入疑似COVID-19感染患者2500例,平均年龄60.61岁±13.89岁。61.4%为男性。需要紧急有创通气的不稳定患者、急性冠状动脉综合征患者、孕妇以及MSCT前有RT-PCR结果的患者被排除在本研究之外。对纳入研究的所有患者进行RT-PCR检测。结果:发热和干咳是最常见的临床症状,分别占80.16%和52.00%。最常见的合并症是心血管疾病,其次是慢性肺部疾病和糖尿病,分别占27.36%、22.80%和18.00%。在1500例rt - pcr阳性患者中,40%的CO-RADS评分为5分,3.4%的CO-RADS评分为1分。在1000例rt - pcr阴性患者中,36%的CO-RADS评分为2分,1%的CO-RADS评分为5分。在所研究的患者中,加权κ值为0.846,且在CO-RADS 5时更为明显(24.40%)。CO-RADS在第二种情况下的敏感性更高(83.27%比55.27%),而在第一种情况下的特异性更高(95%比65%)。结论:CO-RADS评分系统是一种敏感性高、特异性强的新冠肺炎诊断方法,可用于新冠肺炎流行高峰期的诊断。CO-RADS是在资源有限的环境中进行的分诊检测,有助于优化RT-PCR检测、隔离床和重症监护病房。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Polish Journal of Radiology
Polish Journal of Radiology RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信