The role of diffusion-weighted imaging and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of diabetic foot osteomyelitis: a preliminary report.
IF 0.9 Q4 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
{"title":"The role of diffusion-weighted imaging and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of diabetic foot osteomyelitis: a preliminary report.","authors":"Shashank Raj, Mahesh Prakash, Ashu Rastogi, Anindita Sinha, Manavjit Singh Sandhu","doi":"10.5114/pjr.2022.116637","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess the role of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) and diffusionweighted imaging (DWI) in diagnosing diabetic foot osteomyelitis (DFO).</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Twenty-five participants with suspected osteomyelitis were included, who underwent MRI including DCE-MRI and DWI sequences. It was subsequently followed by bone biopsy and microbiological analysis (gold standard). The participants were divided into 2 groups based on biopsy results: DFO-positive or DFO-negative. The semi-quantitative DCE-MRI parameters (SI<sub>0</sub>, SI<sub>max</sub>, SI<sub>rel</sub>, wash-in rate [WIR], and type of curve) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values were subsequently compared between the 2 groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of the 25 cases, 19 were DFO-positive and 6 were DFO-negative on bone biopsy. The SI<sub>0</sub>, SI<sub>max</sub>, and WIR were significantly higher in DFO-positive cases (<i>p</i>-value 0.050, 0.023, and 0.004, respectively). No difference was seen in SI<sub>rel</sub>. 100% negative cases revealed type-I curve, and 94% of positive cases showed type-II curve. SI<sub>0</sub> > 143.4 revealed a sensitivity of 94.7% and specificity of 83.3%. SI<sub>max</sub> had a sensitivity of 89.5% but lower specificity of 67.7% at a cut-off value of 408.35. The most significant difference was seen with WIR; <i>p</i>-value ~0.004. At the cut-off value of > 1.280, it had a specificity and sensitivity of 100% and 76%, respectively. Also, ADC values below 1.57 × 10<sup>-3</sup> had a sensitivity of 88.2% and specificity of 80% for diagnosing DFO.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>DWI and DCE-MRI provide non-invasive sequences, which can help to increase the overall specificity and sensitivity of conventional MRI for the diagnosis of osteomyelitis, differentiating it from acute Charcot's arthropathy.</p>","PeriodicalId":47128,"journal":{"name":"Polish Journal of Radiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/b9/8b/PJR-87-47129.PMC9215298.pdf","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Polish Journal of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/pjr.2022.116637","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
Abstract
Purpose: To assess the role of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) and diffusionweighted imaging (DWI) in diagnosing diabetic foot osteomyelitis (DFO).
Material and methods: Twenty-five participants with suspected osteomyelitis were included, who underwent MRI including DCE-MRI and DWI sequences. It was subsequently followed by bone biopsy and microbiological analysis (gold standard). The participants were divided into 2 groups based on biopsy results: DFO-positive or DFO-negative. The semi-quantitative DCE-MRI parameters (SI0, SImax, SIrel, wash-in rate [WIR], and type of curve) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values were subsequently compared between the 2 groups.
Results: Out of the 25 cases, 19 were DFO-positive and 6 were DFO-negative on bone biopsy. The SI0, SImax, and WIR were significantly higher in DFO-positive cases (p-value 0.050, 0.023, and 0.004, respectively). No difference was seen in SIrel. 100% negative cases revealed type-I curve, and 94% of positive cases showed type-II curve. SI0 > 143.4 revealed a sensitivity of 94.7% and specificity of 83.3%. SImax had a sensitivity of 89.5% but lower specificity of 67.7% at a cut-off value of 408.35. The most significant difference was seen with WIR; p-value ~0.004. At the cut-off value of > 1.280, it had a specificity and sensitivity of 100% and 76%, respectively. Also, ADC values below 1.57 × 10-3 had a sensitivity of 88.2% and specificity of 80% for diagnosing DFO.
Conclusions: DWI and DCE-MRI provide non-invasive sequences, which can help to increase the overall specificity and sensitivity of conventional MRI for the diagnosis of osteomyelitis, differentiating it from acute Charcot's arthropathy.