Use of outcome measures in children with severe cerebral palsy: A survey of U.K. physiotherapists.

Virginia Knox, Pirjo Vuoskoski, Anne Mandy
{"title":"Use of outcome measures in children with severe cerebral palsy: A survey of U.K. physiotherapists.","authors":"Virginia Knox,&nbsp;Pirjo Vuoskoski,&nbsp;Anne Mandy","doi":"10.1002/pri.1786","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To investigate the use of outcome measures for children with cerebral palsy (CP) by paediatric physiotherapists (PTs) who are based in the United Kingdom, as limited research exists regarding their use in this population, and to explore therapists' use of measures within different Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) levels and for different types of CP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A six-item online survey was advertised through two paediatric therapy special interest groups inviting physiotherapists to participate. Descriptive statistics (range, frequencies, and percentages) were used to analyse survey data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two hundred and seven physiotherapists returned completed survey questionnaires. One hundred and seventy-six (85%) therapists reported using a wide variety of outcome measures (57). Eighty-one per cent of therapists' responses for having \"most difficulty\" in identifying responsive outcome measures were for children with impaired mobility at GMFCS Levels IV-V and children with more significant body involvement (76%), for example, spastic quadriplegia or dyskinesia. Eighty-six per cent of therapists' responses for having \"greatest ease\" of identifying responsive outcome measures were for children within GMFCS Levels I-III and for children with less significant body involvement (72%), for example, hemiplegia. The variety of outcome measures used by therapists with children within GMFCS IV-V was less (16).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The majority (85%) of the PTs surveyed used outcome measures with children with CP, but 81% perceived a difficulty in identifying responsive measures for children with more severe impairments who are classified as GMFCS IV-V. The reasons for this perceived difficulty warrant investigation and may suggest a need for training regarding relevant measures and/or a need to develop new measures for this group of children.</p>","PeriodicalId":519522,"journal":{"name":"Physiotherapy research international : the journal for researchers and clinicians in physical therapy","volume":" ","pages":"e1786"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/pri.1786","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiotherapy research international : the journal for researchers and clinicians in physical therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pri.1786","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/6/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Objectives: To investigate the use of outcome measures for children with cerebral palsy (CP) by paediatric physiotherapists (PTs) who are based in the United Kingdom, as limited research exists regarding their use in this population, and to explore therapists' use of measures within different Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) levels and for different types of CP.

Methods: A six-item online survey was advertised through two paediatric therapy special interest groups inviting physiotherapists to participate. Descriptive statistics (range, frequencies, and percentages) were used to analyse survey data.

Results: Two hundred and seven physiotherapists returned completed survey questionnaires. One hundred and seventy-six (85%) therapists reported using a wide variety of outcome measures (57). Eighty-one per cent of therapists' responses for having "most difficulty" in identifying responsive outcome measures were for children with impaired mobility at GMFCS Levels IV-V and children with more significant body involvement (76%), for example, spastic quadriplegia or dyskinesia. Eighty-six per cent of therapists' responses for having "greatest ease" of identifying responsive outcome measures were for children within GMFCS Levels I-III and for children with less significant body involvement (72%), for example, hemiplegia. The variety of outcome measures used by therapists with children within GMFCS IV-V was less (16).

Conclusions: The majority (85%) of the PTs surveyed used outcome measures with children with CP, but 81% perceived a difficulty in identifying responsive measures for children with more severe impairments who are classified as GMFCS IV-V. The reasons for this perceived difficulty warrant investigation and may suggest a need for training regarding relevant measures and/or a need to develop new measures for this group of children.

重度脑瘫患儿预后指标的使用:英国物理治疗师调查
目的:调查英国儿科物理治疗师(PTs)对脑瘫(CP)儿童结局指标的使用情况,因为有关这些指标在这一人群中的使用的研究有限,并探讨治疗师在不同大肌肉运动功能分类系统(GMFCS)水平和不同类型的CP中使用的指标。一项六项的在线调查通过两个儿科治疗特殊兴趣小组进行宣传,邀请物理治疗师参与。描述性统计(范围、频率和百分比)用于分析调查数据。结果:277名物理治疗师完成问卷调查。176名(85%)治疗师报告使用了各种各样的结果测量(57)。81%的治疗师在确定反应性结果测量方面“最困难”的回答是针对GMFCS级别为IV-V的行动障碍儿童和身体受损伤更严重的儿童(76%),例如,痉挛性四肢瘫痪或运动障碍。对于“最容易”确定反应性结果测量的治疗师的回答,86%是针对GMFCS级别为I-III的儿童和身体受损伤不太明显的儿童(72%),例如,偏瘫。在GMFCS IV-V中治疗儿童的治疗师使用的结果测量的多样性较少(16)。结论:大多数(85%)接受调查的PTs使用CP患儿的结果测量,但81%的患者认为难以确定GMFCS IV-V级更严重损伤患儿的反应性测量。造成这种明显困难的原因值得调查,并可能表明需要就有关措施进行培训和/或需要为这群儿童制定新的措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信