Comparison of current guidelines and consensus on the management of patients with cholangiocarcinoma: 2022 update.

IF 1.1 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Xinyi Zhang, Yulong Cai, Xianze Xiong, Ao Liu, Rongxin Zhou, Zhen You, Fuyu Li, Nansheng Cheng
{"title":"Comparison of current guidelines and consensus on the management of patients with cholangiocarcinoma: 2022 update.","authors":"Xinyi Zhang,&nbsp;Yulong Cai,&nbsp;Xianze Xiong,&nbsp;Ao Liu,&nbsp;Rongxin Zhou,&nbsp;Zhen You,&nbsp;Fuyu Li,&nbsp;Nansheng Cheng","doi":"10.5582/irdr.2022.01109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>As a consequence of breakthroughs in the area of guidelines research, the therapy for cholangiocarcinoma has significantly improved the efficacy rate of diagnosis and survival outcomes. We compared the most recently updated clinical practice guidelines and consensus to provide recommendations based on the diagnostic and therapeutic equipment available in various countries. Following a systematic review, we discovered that these guidelines and consensus had both similarities and differences in terms of what organizations or groups drafted the guidelines and the approach, applicability, content and recent updates of the guidelines as well as in terms of diagnostic and treatment algorithms. The disparities could be attributable to a variety of etiological factors, high risk patients, health resources, medical technology, treatment options, and income levels. Additionally, while complete adoption of guidelines may benefit physicians, patients, and authorities, there remains a disconnect between expected goals and implementation.</p>","PeriodicalId":14420,"journal":{"name":"Intractable & rare diseases research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9709616/pdf/irdr-11-161.pdf","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intractable & rare diseases research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5582/irdr.2022.01109","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

As a consequence of breakthroughs in the area of guidelines research, the therapy for cholangiocarcinoma has significantly improved the efficacy rate of diagnosis and survival outcomes. We compared the most recently updated clinical practice guidelines and consensus to provide recommendations based on the diagnostic and therapeutic equipment available in various countries. Following a systematic review, we discovered that these guidelines and consensus had both similarities and differences in terms of what organizations or groups drafted the guidelines and the approach, applicability, content and recent updates of the guidelines as well as in terms of diagnostic and treatment algorithms. The disparities could be attributable to a variety of etiological factors, high risk patients, health resources, medical technology, treatment options, and income levels. Additionally, while complete adoption of guidelines may benefit physicians, patients, and authorities, there remains a disconnect between expected goals and implementation.

胆管癌患者管理的现行指南和共识的比较:2022年更新。
由于指南研究领域的突破,胆管癌的治疗显著提高了诊断率和生存结局。我们比较了最新更新的临床实践指南和共识,根据各国现有的诊断和治疗设备提供建议。经过系统回顾,我们发现这些指南和共识在哪些组织或团体起草指南和方法、适用性、内容和指南的最新更新以及诊断和治疗算法方面既有相似之处,也有差异。这种差异可归因于多种病因、高危患者、卫生资源、医疗技术、治疗方案和收入水平。此外,虽然指南的完全采用可能使医生、患者和当局受益,但预期目标和实施之间仍然存在脱节。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Intractable & rare diseases research
Intractable & rare diseases research MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信