Odevixibat treatment in progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis: a randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial.

Richard J Thompson, Henrik Arnell, Reha Artan, Ulrich Baumann, Pier Luigi Calvo, Piotr Czubkowski, Buket Dalgic, Lorenzo D'Antiga, Özlem Durmaz, Björn Fischler, Emmanuel Gonzalès, Tassos Grammatikopoulos, Girish Gupte, Winita Hardikar, Roderick H J Houwen, Binita M Kamath, Saul J Karpen, Lise Kjems, Florence Lacaille, Alain Lachaux, Elke Lainka, Cara L Mack, Jan P Mattsson, Patrick McKiernan, Hasan Özen, Sanjay R Rajwal, Bertrand Roquelaure, Mohammad Shagrani, Eyal Shteyer, Nisreen Soufi, Ekkehard Sturm, Mary Elizabeth Tessier, Henkjan J Verkade, Patrick Horn
{"title":"Odevixibat treatment in progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis: a randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial.","authors":"Richard J Thompson,&nbsp;Henrik Arnell,&nbsp;Reha Artan,&nbsp;Ulrich Baumann,&nbsp;Pier Luigi Calvo,&nbsp;Piotr Czubkowski,&nbsp;Buket Dalgic,&nbsp;Lorenzo D'Antiga,&nbsp;Özlem Durmaz,&nbsp;Björn Fischler,&nbsp;Emmanuel Gonzalès,&nbsp;Tassos Grammatikopoulos,&nbsp;Girish Gupte,&nbsp;Winita Hardikar,&nbsp;Roderick H J Houwen,&nbsp;Binita M Kamath,&nbsp;Saul J Karpen,&nbsp;Lise Kjems,&nbsp;Florence Lacaille,&nbsp;Alain Lachaux,&nbsp;Elke Lainka,&nbsp;Cara L Mack,&nbsp;Jan P Mattsson,&nbsp;Patrick McKiernan,&nbsp;Hasan Özen,&nbsp;Sanjay R Rajwal,&nbsp;Bertrand Roquelaure,&nbsp;Mohammad Shagrani,&nbsp;Eyal Shteyer,&nbsp;Nisreen Soufi,&nbsp;Ekkehard Sturm,&nbsp;Mary Elizabeth Tessier,&nbsp;Henkjan J Verkade,&nbsp;Patrick Horn","doi":"10.1016/S2468-1253(22)00093-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis (PFIC) is a group of inherited paediatric liver diseases resulting from mutations in genes that impact bile secretion. We aimed to evaluate the effects of odevixibat, an ileal bile acid transporter inhibitor, versus placebo in children with PFIC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients eligible for this 24-week, randomised, double-blind, completed, phase 3 study were paediatric outpatients diagnosed with PFIC1 or PFIC2 who had pruritus and elevated serum bile acids at screening. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1) using an interactive web-based system to once a day oral placebo, odevixibat 40 μg/kg, or odevixibat 120 μg/kg. Randomisation was done in a block size of six and stratified by PFIC type and patient age; patients, clinicians, and study staff were blinded to treatment allocation. Patients were enrolled at one of 33 global sites. Two primary endpoints were evaluated: proportion of positive pruritus assessments (PPAs; ie, scratching score of ≤1 or ≥1-point decrease as assessed by caregivers using the Albireo observer-reported outcome [ObsRO] PRUCISION instrument) over 24 weeks, and proportion of patients with serum bile acid response (ie, serum bile acids reduced by ≥70% from baseline or concentrations of ≤70 μmol/L) at week 24. Efficacy and safety were analysed in randomly allocated patients who received one or more doses of study drug. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03566238.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Between June 21, 2018, and Feb 10, 2020, 62 patients (median age 3·2 [range 0·5-15·9] years) were randomly allocated to placebo (n=20), odevixibat 40 μg/kg per day (n=23), or odevixibat 120 μg/kg per day (n=19). Model-adjusted (least squares) mean proportion of PPAs was significantly higher with odevixibat versus placebo (55% [SE 8] in the combined odevixibat group [58% in the 40 μg/kg per day group and 52% in the 120 μg/kg per day group] vs 30% [SE 9] in the placebo group; model-adjusted mean difference 25·0% [95% CI 8·5-41·5]; p=0·0038). The percentage of patients with serum bile acid response was also significantly higher with odevixibat versus placebo (14 [33%] of 42 patients in the combined odevixibat group [10 in the 40 μg/kg per day group and four in the 120 μg/kg per day group] vs none of 20 in the placebo group; adjusting for stratification factor [PFIC type], the proportion difference was 30·7% [95% CI 12·6-48·8; p=0·0030]). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were diarrhoea or frequent bowel movements (13 [31%] of 42 for odevixibat vs two [10%] of 20 for placebo) and fever (12 [29%] of 42 vs five [25%] of 20); serious TEAEs occurred in three (7%) of 42 odevixibat-treated patients and in five (25%) of 20 placebo-treated patients.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>In children with PFIC, odevixibat effectively reduced pruritus and serum bile acids versus placebo and was generally well tolerated. Odevixibat, administered as once a day oral capsules, is a non-surgical, pharmacological option to interrupt the enterohepatic circulation in patients with PFIC.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>Albireo Pharma.</p>","PeriodicalId":114609,"journal":{"name":"The lancet. Gastroenterology & hepatology","volume":" ","pages":"830-842"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"34","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The lancet. Gastroenterology & hepatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-1253(22)00093-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 34

Abstract

Background: Progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis (PFIC) is a group of inherited paediatric liver diseases resulting from mutations in genes that impact bile secretion. We aimed to evaluate the effects of odevixibat, an ileal bile acid transporter inhibitor, versus placebo in children with PFIC.

Methods: Patients eligible for this 24-week, randomised, double-blind, completed, phase 3 study were paediatric outpatients diagnosed with PFIC1 or PFIC2 who had pruritus and elevated serum bile acids at screening. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1) using an interactive web-based system to once a day oral placebo, odevixibat 40 μg/kg, or odevixibat 120 μg/kg. Randomisation was done in a block size of six and stratified by PFIC type and patient age; patients, clinicians, and study staff were blinded to treatment allocation. Patients were enrolled at one of 33 global sites. Two primary endpoints were evaluated: proportion of positive pruritus assessments (PPAs; ie, scratching score of ≤1 or ≥1-point decrease as assessed by caregivers using the Albireo observer-reported outcome [ObsRO] PRUCISION instrument) over 24 weeks, and proportion of patients with serum bile acid response (ie, serum bile acids reduced by ≥70% from baseline or concentrations of ≤70 μmol/L) at week 24. Efficacy and safety were analysed in randomly allocated patients who received one or more doses of study drug. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03566238.

Findings: Between June 21, 2018, and Feb 10, 2020, 62 patients (median age 3·2 [range 0·5-15·9] years) were randomly allocated to placebo (n=20), odevixibat 40 μg/kg per day (n=23), or odevixibat 120 μg/kg per day (n=19). Model-adjusted (least squares) mean proportion of PPAs was significantly higher with odevixibat versus placebo (55% [SE 8] in the combined odevixibat group [58% in the 40 μg/kg per day group and 52% in the 120 μg/kg per day group] vs 30% [SE 9] in the placebo group; model-adjusted mean difference 25·0% [95% CI 8·5-41·5]; p=0·0038). The percentage of patients with serum bile acid response was also significantly higher with odevixibat versus placebo (14 [33%] of 42 patients in the combined odevixibat group [10 in the 40 μg/kg per day group and four in the 120 μg/kg per day group] vs none of 20 in the placebo group; adjusting for stratification factor [PFIC type], the proportion difference was 30·7% [95% CI 12·6-48·8; p=0·0030]). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were diarrhoea or frequent bowel movements (13 [31%] of 42 for odevixibat vs two [10%] of 20 for placebo) and fever (12 [29%] of 42 vs five [25%] of 20); serious TEAEs occurred in three (7%) of 42 odevixibat-treated patients and in five (25%) of 20 placebo-treated patients.

Interpretation: In children with PFIC, odevixibat effectively reduced pruritus and serum bile acids versus placebo and was generally well tolerated. Odevixibat, administered as once a day oral capsules, is a non-surgical, pharmacological option to interrupt the enterohepatic circulation in patients with PFIC.

Funding: Albireo Pharma.

奥维西巴治疗进行性家族性肝内胆汁淤积症:一项随机、安慰剂对照的3期试验。
背景:进行性家族性肝内胆汁淤积症(PFIC)是一组由影响胆汁分泌的基因突变引起的遗传性儿科肝病。我们的目的是评估odevixibat(一种回肠胆汁酸转运蛋白抑制剂)与安慰剂在PFIC儿童中的作用。方法:符合这项为期24周、随机、双盲、完成的3期研究的患者是诊断为PFIC1或PFIC2的儿科门诊患者,他们在筛查时有瘙痒和血清胆汁酸升高。使用交互式网络系统随机分配患者(1:1:1),每天一次口服安慰剂,odevixibat 40 μg/kg或odevixibat 120 μg/kg。随机分组大小为6个,按PFIC类型和患者年龄分层;患者、临床医生和研究人员对治疗分配不知情。患者在全球33个地点之一入组。评估了两个主要终点:瘙痒评估阳性的比例(PPAs);即,护理人员使用Albireo观察者报告的结果[ObsRO] PRUCISION仪器评估的抓痕评分在24周内下降≤1或≥1分,以及血清胆汁酸反应(即血清胆汁酸较基线降低≥70%或浓度≤70 μmol/L)的患者比例。对随机分配的接受一剂或多剂研究药物的患者进行疗效和安全性分析。本研究已在ClinicalTrials.gov注册,编号NCT03566238。研究结果:在2018年6月21日至2020年2月10日期间,62例患者(中位年龄为6.2岁[范围0.5 - 15.9]岁)被随机分配到安慰剂组(n=20)、奥维西巴40 μg/kg / d组(n=23)和奥维西巴120 μg/kg / d组(n=19)。经模型校正(最小二乘)的平均PPAs比例,奥维西巴组显著高于安慰剂组(联合奥维西巴组为55% [SE 8] [40 μg/kg /天组为58%,120 μg/kg /天组为52%],安慰剂组为30% [SE 9];模型校正平均差25.0% [95% CI 8.5 - 41.5];p = 0·0038)。奥维西巴与安慰剂相比,血清胆汁酸应答的患者比例也显著更高(42例患者中,联合奥维西巴组有14例(33%)[40 μg/kg /天组有10例,120 μg/kg /天组有4例],而安慰剂组20例患者中无一例;调整分层因素[PFIC类型]后,比例差异为30.7% [95% CI 12.6 - 48.8;p = 0·0030)。最常见的治疗不良事件(teae)是腹泻或频繁排便(odevixibat组42例中的13例[31%]vs安慰剂组20例中的2例[10%])和发烧(42例中的12例[29%]vs 20例中的5例[25%]);42例odevixibat组患者中有3例(7%)发生严重teae, 20例安慰剂组患者中有5例(25%)发生严重teae。结论:在PFIC患儿中,与安慰剂相比,odevixibat有效地减少了瘙痒和血清胆汁酸,并且通常耐受性良好。Odevixibat口服胶囊,每天一次,是PFIC患者中断肠肝循环的非手术药物选择。资助:Albireo Pharma。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信