A pandemic of inequality: reflections on AIDS and COVID-19 in the southern African context.

Arnau van Wyngaard
{"title":"A pandemic of inequality: reflections on AIDS and COVID-19 in the southern African context.","authors":"Arnau van Wyngaard","doi":"10.2989/16085906.2022.2078730","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In 2020, COVID-19 started spreading from Wuhan in China to the USA, the UK and Europe and then to the rest of the world. In Africa, the first case of COVID-19 was reported in Egypt on 14 February, while South Africa's first case was identified on 5 March. On 11 March, the World Health Organization declared a pandemic. At the time, it was said that COVID-19 would become the great equaliser because the virus made no distinction between first and third world countries, between the rich and the poor, and nor was it influenced by gender, sexual orientation or race. When someone contracted SARS-CoV-2, no guarantee could be given that the patient would survive, regardless of who they were or their status in the community.This stood in contrast to the early experience of AIDS before antiretrovirals existed and when HIV was spreading like wildfire in sub-Saharan Africa and other countries with low or lower-middle-income status. It seemed as if these countries were doubly cursed - by poverty and the AIDS pandemic that was causing as many as 6 000 mortalities per day in sub-Saharan Africa. This led to the South African president at the time, Thabo Mbeki, to assert that poverty was an even greater problem than HIV and AIDS.It did not take long to see that COVID-19 was not the anticipated equaliser. As lockdowns were enforced within most countries across the globe and resulting in economic slumps, differences between rich and poorer countries and their respective citizens were thrown into sharp relief once again. This article reports how both AIDS and COVID-19 adversely affected women, the impoverished and those without access to sustainable souces of food and medicine.</p>","PeriodicalId":520548,"journal":{"name":"African journal of AIDS research : AJAR","volume":" ","pages":"152-161"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African journal of AIDS research : AJAR","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2989/16085906.2022.2078730","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In 2020, COVID-19 started spreading from Wuhan in China to the USA, the UK and Europe and then to the rest of the world. In Africa, the first case of COVID-19 was reported in Egypt on 14 February, while South Africa's first case was identified on 5 March. On 11 March, the World Health Organization declared a pandemic. At the time, it was said that COVID-19 would become the great equaliser because the virus made no distinction between first and third world countries, between the rich and the poor, and nor was it influenced by gender, sexual orientation or race. When someone contracted SARS-CoV-2, no guarantee could be given that the patient would survive, regardless of who they were or their status in the community.This stood in contrast to the early experience of AIDS before antiretrovirals existed and when HIV was spreading like wildfire in sub-Saharan Africa and other countries with low or lower-middle-income status. It seemed as if these countries were doubly cursed - by poverty and the AIDS pandemic that was causing as many as 6 000 mortalities per day in sub-Saharan Africa. This led to the South African president at the time, Thabo Mbeki, to assert that poverty was an even greater problem than HIV and AIDS.It did not take long to see that COVID-19 was not the anticipated equaliser. As lockdowns were enforced within most countries across the globe and resulting in economic slumps, differences between rich and poorer countries and their respective citizens were thrown into sharp relief once again. This article reports how both AIDS and COVID-19 adversely affected women, the impoverished and those without access to sustainable souces of food and medicine.

不平等大流行:在南部非洲背景下对艾滋病和COVID-19的思考。
2020年,COVID-19开始从中国武汉传播到美国、英国和欧洲,然后传播到世界其他地区。在非洲,埃及于2月14日报告了首例COVID-19病例,而南非的首例病例于3月5日得到确认。3月11日,世界卫生组织宣布大流行。当时有人说,新冠病毒将成为一个伟大的均衡器,因为它不分第一世界和第三世界,不分贫富,也不受性别、性取向和种族的影响。当有人感染了SARS-CoV-2时,无论他们是谁或他们在社区中的地位如何,都不能保证病人能活下来。这与抗逆转录病毒药物出现之前艾滋病的早期经历形成鲜明对比,当时艾滋病毒在撒哈拉以南非洲和其他低收入或中低收入国家像野火一样蔓延。这些国家似乎受到了双重诅咒——贫穷和艾滋病的流行,在撒哈拉以南非洲,艾滋病每天造成多达6 000人死亡。这导致当时的南非总统塔博·姆贝基(Thabo Mbeki)断言,贫困是比艾滋病毒和艾滋病更严重的问题。没过多久,我们就发现COVID-19并不是预期的平衡因素。随着全球大多数国家实施封锁并导致经济衰退,富国和穷国以及各自公民之间的差异再次突显出来。本文报道了艾滋病和COVID-19如何对妇女、贫困人口以及无法获得可持续粮食和药品来源的人产生不利影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信