Comparison of Lapse Rate in Drug Dependent Patients in 2 Methods of Methadone Maintenance Treatment and Buprenorphine Maintenance Treatment.

IF 2.4 Q3 SUBSTANCE ABUSE
Substance Abuse: Research and Treatment Pub Date : 2022-07-22 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1177/11782218221112502
Mohammadreza Vafaeinasab, Hamidreza Zare, Ali Dehghani, Seyedehzahra Malek, Maryam Dehghani-Tafti, Mohammadtaghi Sarebanhassanabadi
{"title":"Comparison of Lapse Rate in Drug Dependent Patients in 2 Methods of Methadone Maintenance Treatment and Buprenorphine Maintenance Treatment.","authors":"Mohammadreza Vafaeinasab,&nbsp;Hamidreza Zare,&nbsp;Ali Dehghani,&nbsp;Seyedehzahra Malek,&nbsp;Maryam Dehghani-Tafti,&nbsp;Mohammadtaghi Sarebanhassanabadi","doi":"10.1177/11782218221112502","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Lapse has been one of the major challenges in the treatment of drug dependence sometimes leading to its relapse.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this study was to determine the lapse rate in drug dependent patients as for the 2 methods of methadone maintenance treatment (MMT) and buprenorphine maintenance treatment (BMT) in Yazd city.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this cross-sectional study, 626 female and male patients who had referred to 5 SUD treatment centers in Yazd and had been treated with methadone and buprenorphine maintenance were studied. Participants were divided into 2 groups of MMT and BMT and were evaluated based on lapse within 6 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In this study, 60.9% of patients were treated with methadone but the rest were treated with buprenorphine. Overall, 33.1% of patients lapsed (35.2% for methadone and 29.8%for buprenorphine). Lapse in methadone treatment was correlated with age, occupational status, and duration of treatment (<i>P</i> < .05); it failed to correlated with any other demographic and clinical characteristics (<i>P</i> > .05). Lapse rate in buprenorphine treatment was also related to marital status and the drug used (<i>P</i> < .05). The mean dose of buprenorphine consumed showed no significant relationship with lapse (<i>P</i> > .05). The results demonstrated that given the low dose, lapse stood higher in the buprenorphine group than the methadone group; however, as to high dose, the buprenorphine group showed lower lapse than the other group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In regard with the high rate of lapse, it is recommended to consider the factors related to the 2 methods of treatments, and provide counseling and training programs to lower lapse in the patients.<b>Ethics Committee (REC) approval code:</b> IR.SSU.REC.1394.158.</p>","PeriodicalId":22185,"journal":{"name":"Substance Abuse: Research and Treatment","volume":" ","pages":"11782218221112502"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/30/41/10.1177_11782218221112502.PMC9315257.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Substance Abuse: Research and Treatment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/11782218221112502","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Lapse has been one of the major challenges in the treatment of drug dependence sometimes leading to its relapse.

Objectives: The aim of this study was to determine the lapse rate in drug dependent patients as for the 2 methods of methadone maintenance treatment (MMT) and buprenorphine maintenance treatment (BMT) in Yazd city.

Methods: In this cross-sectional study, 626 female and male patients who had referred to 5 SUD treatment centers in Yazd and had been treated with methadone and buprenorphine maintenance were studied. Participants were divided into 2 groups of MMT and BMT and were evaluated based on lapse within 6 months.

Results: In this study, 60.9% of patients were treated with methadone but the rest were treated with buprenorphine. Overall, 33.1% of patients lapsed (35.2% for methadone and 29.8%for buprenorphine). Lapse in methadone treatment was correlated with age, occupational status, and duration of treatment (P < .05); it failed to correlated with any other demographic and clinical characteristics (P > .05). Lapse rate in buprenorphine treatment was also related to marital status and the drug used (P < .05). The mean dose of buprenorphine consumed showed no significant relationship with lapse (P > .05). The results demonstrated that given the low dose, lapse stood higher in the buprenorphine group than the methadone group; however, as to high dose, the buprenorphine group showed lower lapse than the other group.

Conclusions: In regard with the high rate of lapse, it is recommended to consider the factors related to the 2 methods of treatments, and provide counseling and training programs to lower lapse in the patients.Ethics Committee (REC) approval code: IR.SSU.REC.1394.158.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

美沙酮维持治疗与丁丙诺啡维持治疗两种药物依赖患者失效率的比较
背景:失败一直是药物依赖治疗的主要挑战之一,有时会导致其复发。目的:了解亚兹德市药物依赖患者美沙酮维持治疗(MMT)和丁丙诺啡维持治疗(BMT)两种方法的失续率。方法:采用横断面研究方法,对在亚兹德市5家SUD治疗中心就诊并给予美沙酮和丁丙诺啡维持治疗的626例男女患者进行研究。参与者分为MMT组和BMT组,根据6个月内的消失情况进行评估。结果:60.9%的患者采用美沙酮治疗,其余患者采用丁丙诺啡治疗。总体而言,33.1%的患者失效(美沙酮组为35.2%,丁丙诺啡组为29.8%)。美沙酮治疗失效与患者年龄、职业状况、治疗时间相关(P > 0.05)。丁丙诺啡治疗失败率与婚姻状况、用药相关(P > 0.05)。结果表明:在低剂量下,丁丙诺啡组的死亡率高于美沙酮组;而在大剂量下,丁丙诺啡组的失效率低于其他组。结论:对于高失败率的患者,建议综合考虑两种治疗方法的相关因素,并提供咨询和培训方案,以降低患者的失败率。伦理委员会(REC)批准代码:ir . ssur .REC.1394.158。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
50
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信