Therapeutic Alliance and Intervention Approach Among Acutely Suicidal Patients.

Psychiatry Pub Date : 2019-01-01 Epub Date: 2018-08-17 DOI:10.1080/00332747.2018.1485371
Craig J Bryan, David C Rozek, T Scott Burch, Bruce Leeson, Tracy A Clemans
{"title":"Therapeutic Alliance and Intervention Approach Among Acutely Suicidal Patients.","authors":"Craig J Bryan, David C Rozek, T Scott Burch, Bruce Leeson, Tracy A Clemans","doi":"10.1080/00332747.2018.1485371","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Decades of research have supported a positive correlation between the therapeutic alliance and a reduction in psychological symptoms, but studies investigating the correlation of therapeutic alliance with suiciderelated outcomes are sparse. Preliminary studies suggest a negative correlation of alliance with suicidal thoughts and occurrence of nonsuicidal self-injury following suicidefocused treatments (Bedics, Atkins, Comtois, & Linehan, 2012; Gysin-Maillart, Schwab, Soravia, Megert, & Michel, 2016) but no correlation in treatments that are not suicide focused (Bedics et al., 2012; Bryan et al., 2012). Interpersonal dynamics and intervention approaches may therefore interact with each other. Unfortunately, studies to date have not explicitly tested this possibility. To address this knowledge gap, we conducted a secondary analysis of a recently completed randomized clinical trial (RCT) finding that crisis response planning (CRP) significantly reduced suicidal thoughts and behaviors among 97 high-risk soldiers as compared to treatment as usual (TAU; Bryan et al., 2017). After providing consent, soldiers reporting suicide ideation during the past week and/or a lifetime history of suicide attempts were randomly assigned to either a CRP or TAU. Immediately postintervention, soldiers completed the Working Alliance Inventory—Short Form (Hatcher & Gillaspy, 2006). Suicide attempts were assessed with the Suicide Attempt Self-Injury Interview (Linehan, Comtois, Brown, Heard, & Wagner, 2006), and severity of suicide ideation was assessed with the Scale for Suicide Ideation (Beck & Steer, 1991). Although CRP alliance ratings were somewhat higher (M = 58.9, SD = 12.2) than TAU ratings (M = 53.3, SD = 15.6), this difference was not statistically significant (F (1, 91) = 3.19, p = .077, d = 0.42). Results of generalized linear mixed effects modeling with a robust sandwich estimator and baseline suicide ideation entered as a covariate indicated the interaction of therapeutic alliance with treatment group was a statistically significant predictor of follow-up suicide ideation (F (1, 41) = 6.83, p = .013) and suicide attempt (F (1, 87) = 4.97, p = .028). The forms of these interactions are displayed in Figure 1. In CRP, suicide ideation (B = −0.10, SE = 0.05, p = .044, R = 0.42)","PeriodicalId":510883,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"80-82"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00332747.2018.1485371","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00332747.2018.1485371","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/8/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Decades of research have supported a positive correlation between the therapeutic alliance and a reduction in psychological symptoms, but studies investigating the correlation of therapeutic alliance with suiciderelated outcomes are sparse. Preliminary studies suggest a negative correlation of alliance with suicidal thoughts and occurrence of nonsuicidal self-injury following suicidefocused treatments (Bedics, Atkins, Comtois, & Linehan, 2012; Gysin-Maillart, Schwab, Soravia, Megert, & Michel, 2016) but no correlation in treatments that are not suicide focused (Bedics et al., 2012; Bryan et al., 2012). Interpersonal dynamics and intervention approaches may therefore interact with each other. Unfortunately, studies to date have not explicitly tested this possibility. To address this knowledge gap, we conducted a secondary analysis of a recently completed randomized clinical trial (RCT) finding that crisis response planning (CRP) significantly reduced suicidal thoughts and behaviors among 97 high-risk soldiers as compared to treatment as usual (TAU; Bryan et al., 2017). After providing consent, soldiers reporting suicide ideation during the past week and/or a lifetime history of suicide attempts were randomly assigned to either a CRP or TAU. Immediately postintervention, soldiers completed the Working Alliance Inventory—Short Form (Hatcher & Gillaspy, 2006). Suicide attempts were assessed with the Suicide Attempt Self-Injury Interview (Linehan, Comtois, Brown, Heard, & Wagner, 2006), and severity of suicide ideation was assessed with the Scale for Suicide Ideation (Beck & Steer, 1991). Although CRP alliance ratings were somewhat higher (M = 58.9, SD = 12.2) than TAU ratings (M = 53.3, SD = 15.6), this difference was not statistically significant (F (1, 91) = 3.19, p = .077, d = 0.42). Results of generalized linear mixed effects modeling with a robust sandwich estimator and baseline suicide ideation entered as a covariate indicated the interaction of therapeutic alliance with treatment group was a statistically significant predictor of follow-up suicide ideation (F (1, 41) = 6.83, p = .013) and suicide attempt (F (1, 87) = 4.97, p = .028). The forms of these interactions are displayed in Figure 1. In CRP, suicide ideation (B = −0.10, SE = 0.05, p = .044, R = 0.42)
急性自杀患者的联合治疗及干预方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书