Optimization of acute medication use following eptinezumab initiation during a migraine attack: post hoc analysis of the RELIEF study.

Roger Cady, Richard B Lipton, Dawn C Buse, Mette Krog Josiassen, Annika Lindsten, Anders Ettrup
{"title":"Optimization of acute medication use following eptinezumab initiation during a migraine attack: post hoc analysis of the RELIEF study.","authors":"Roger Cady,&nbsp;Richard B Lipton,&nbsp;Dawn C Buse,&nbsp;Mette Krog Josiassen,&nbsp;Annika Lindsten,&nbsp;Anders Ettrup","doi":"10.1186/s10194-022-01463-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The benefits of preventive treatment on the effectiveness of migraine management have rarely been examined. This post hoc analysis investigated the impact of eptinezumab on the optimization of acute medication effectiveness using the 4-item Migraine Treatment Optimization Questionnaire (mTOQ-4) to measure acute medication optimization over 4 weeks post-infusion.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>RELIEF was a 12-week, phase 3, multicenter, parallel-group, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial conducted in patients aged 18-75 years with a ≥ 1-year history of migraine and 4-15 migraine days per month in the 3 months prior to screening. Patients were randomized 1:1 to a 30-min infusion of eptinezumab 100 mg or placebo within 1-6 h of a qualifying migraine attack. The mTOQ-6 and 6-item Headache Impact Test (HIT-6) were administered at screening visit and week 4. From the mTOQ-6, we calculated the mTOQ-4 using the following items: \"2-h pain free,\" \"24-h relief,\" \"able to plan,\" and \"feeling in control\" to measure acute medication optimization.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 238 patients received eptinezumab 100 mg and 226 provided week 4 data; 242 received placebo and 232 provided week 4 data. In the eptinezumab arm, the proportion of patients with moderate/maximal optimization increased from 31.4% at baseline to 58.0% (26.6 percentage point increase) at week 4. The corresponding proportions in the placebo group were 40.5% to 50.4% (9.9 percentage point increase). Eptinezumab treatment was associated with numerically larger improvements in HIT-6 at week 4. Relative improvements with eptinezumab vs. placebo from baseline to week 4 in HIT-6 were greater in those with poor treatment optimization at baseline.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In comparison with placebo, treatment with eptinezumab was associated with improvements in acute medication optimization as measured by mTOQ and reductions in headache impact, as measured by HIT-6. These benefits were greater in those with poor acute treatment optimization prior to preventive treatment with eptinezumab.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04152083 .</p>","PeriodicalId":501630,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Headache and Pain","volume":" ","pages":"91"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9336038/pdf/","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Headache and Pain","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s10194-022-01463-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Background: The benefits of preventive treatment on the effectiveness of migraine management have rarely been examined. This post hoc analysis investigated the impact of eptinezumab on the optimization of acute medication effectiveness using the 4-item Migraine Treatment Optimization Questionnaire (mTOQ-4) to measure acute medication optimization over 4 weeks post-infusion.

Methods: RELIEF was a 12-week, phase 3, multicenter, parallel-group, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial conducted in patients aged 18-75 years with a ≥ 1-year history of migraine and 4-15 migraine days per month in the 3 months prior to screening. Patients were randomized 1:1 to a 30-min infusion of eptinezumab 100 mg or placebo within 1-6 h of a qualifying migraine attack. The mTOQ-6 and 6-item Headache Impact Test (HIT-6) were administered at screening visit and week 4. From the mTOQ-6, we calculated the mTOQ-4 using the following items: "2-h pain free," "24-h relief," "able to plan," and "feeling in control" to measure acute medication optimization.

Results: A total of 238 patients received eptinezumab 100 mg and 226 provided week 4 data; 242 received placebo and 232 provided week 4 data. In the eptinezumab arm, the proportion of patients with moderate/maximal optimization increased from 31.4% at baseline to 58.0% (26.6 percentage point increase) at week 4. The corresponding proportions in the placebo group were 40.5% to 50.4% (9.9 percentage point increase). Eptinezumab treatment was associated with numerically larger improvements in HIT-6 at week 4. Relative improvements with eptinezumab vs. placebo from baseline to week 4 in HIT-6 were greater in those with poor treatment optimization at baseline.

Conclusions: In comparison with placebo, treatment with eptinezumab was associated with improvements in acute medication optimization as measured by mTOQ and reductions in headache impact, as measured by HIT-6. These benefits were greater in those with poor acute treatment optimization prior to preventive treatment with eptinezumab.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04152083 .

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

偏头痛发作期间开始使用依替单抗后的急性用药优化:RELIEF研究的事后分析
背景:预防性治疗对偏头痛管理有效性的益处很少被研究。这项事后分析研究了eptinezumab对急性用药效果优化的影响,采用4项偏头痛治疗优化问卷(mTOQ-4)来衡量输注后4周内的急性用药优化。方法:RELIEF是一项为期12周、多中心、平行组、双盲、安慰剂对照的3期临床试验,患者年龄为18-75岁,偏头痛病史≥1年,筛查前3个月内每月偏头痛天数为4-15天。患者在偏头痛发作后1-6小时内按1:1的比例随机分配至30分钟输注100mg eptinezumab或安慰剂。在筛选访问和第4周进行mTOQ-6和6项头痛影响测试(HIT-6)。从mTOQ-6中,我们计算出mTOQ-4,使用以下项目:“2小时无疼痛”、“24小时缓解”、“能够计划”和“感觉控制”来衡量急性用药优化。结果:共有238例患者接受了100mg的eptinezumab治疗,226例提供了第4周的数据;242人接受安慰剂治疗,232人提供第4周数据。在eptinezumab组,获得中度/最大优化的患者比例从基线时的31.4%增加到第4周时的58.0%(增加26.6个百分点)。安慰剂组的相应比例为40.5%至50.4%(增加9.9个百分点)。Eptinezumab治疗与第4周HIT-6的数值较大改善相关。在基线时治疗优化较差的患者中,从基线到第4周,使用依替单抗与安慰剂在HIT-6中的相对改善更大。结论:与安慰剂相比,使用eptinezumab治疗与mTOQ测量的急性药物优化改善和HIT-6测量的头痛影响减少相关。在使用eptinezumab进行预防性治疗之前,急性治疗优化效果较差的患者获益更大。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT04152083。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信