The Effect of Sildenafil on Pregnancy Outcomes in Pregnant Women With Idiopathic Borderline Oligohydramnios: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Marzieh Vahid Dastjerdi, Akram Ghahghaei-Nezamabadi, Afsaneh Tehranian, Mahbobeh Mesgaran
{"title":"The Effect of Sildenafil on Pregnancy Outcomes in Pregnant Women With Idiopathic Borderline Oligohydramnios: A Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Marzieh Vahid Dastjerdi,&nbsp;Akram Ghahghaei-Nezamabadi,&nbsp;Afsaneh Tehranian,&nbsp;Mahbobeh Mesgaran","doi":"10.18502/jfrh.v16i2.9482","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> Borderline oligohydramnios always produces a dilemma of management and counseling among obstetricians. This study was designed to compare the effect of sildenafil plus fluid therapy versus fluid therapy alone on pregnancy outcomes and AFI improvement in pregnant women complicated by idiopathic borderline oligohydramnios. <b>Materials and methods</b> <b>:</b> This randomized clinical trial was conducted in Arash Women's Hospital, Tehran, Iran from 2017 to 2020. Fifty-one pregnant women with idiopathic borderline oligohydramnios were allocated to two groups. Group 1 received fluid therapy and Group 2 received fluid therapy and Sildenafil 25 mg three times daily for six weeks. AFI was measured at the time of randomization, 24 h after treatment and then weekly for six weeks. The changes in AFI, type of delivery, gestational age at delivery, and neonatal outcomes were compared between the two groups. <b>Results:</b> After the intervention, the change in AFI between two groups was not statistically significant. Maternal and fetal outcomes are compared between two groups and there was no significant difference between them. The median (Inter-quartile range) AFI after intervention, in Sildenafil group compared with hydration group, were in 24 hours (8.5 vs. 8, p=0.27), first (9.5 vs. 9.1, p=0.74), second (9 vs 10, p=0.12) third (10.4 vs. 9.4, p=0.33), fourth (10.8 vs 9.1, p=0.1) and Fifth week (10 vs 9.3, p=0.5) of follow-up respectively, but none of them were statistically significant. <b>Conclusion:</b> The findings showed that sildenafil plus fluid therapy do not improve the pregnancy outcomes in women with isolated borderline oligohydramnios compared to fluid therapy alone.</p>","PeriodicalId":15845,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Family and Reproductive Health","volume":"16 2","pages":"124-131"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/50/f0/JFRH-16-124.PMC9678853.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Family and Reproductive Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/jfrh.v16i2.9482","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective: Borderline oligohydramnios always produces a dilemma of management and counseling among obstetricians. This study was designed to compare the effect of sildenafil plus fluid therapy versus fluid therapy alone on pregnancy outcomes and AFI improvement in pregnant women complicated by idiopathic borderline oligohydramnios. Materials and methods : This randomized clinical trial was conducted in Arash Women's Hospital, Tehran, Iran from 2017 to 2020. Fifty-one pregnant women with idiopathic borderline oligohydramnios were allocated to two groups. Group 1 received fluid therapy and Group 2 received fluid therapy and Sildenafil 25 mg three times daily for six weeks. AFI was measured at the time of randomization, 24 h after treatment and then weekly for six weeks. The changes in AFI, type of delivery, gestational age at delivery, and neonatal outcomes were compared between the two groups. Results: After the intervention, the change in AFI between two groups was not statistically significant. Maternal and fetal outcomes are compared between two groups and there was no significant difference between them. The median (Inter-quartile range) AFI after intervention, in Sildenafil group compared with hydration group, were in 24 hours (8.5 vs. 8, p=0.27), first (9.5 vs. 9.1, p=0.74), second (9 vs 10, p=0.12) third (10.4 vs. 9.4, p=0.33), fourth (10.8 vs 9.1, p=0.1) and Fifth week (10 vs 9.3, p=0.5) of follow-up respectively, but none of them were statistically significant. Conclusion: The findings showed that sildenafil plus fluid therapy do not improve the pregnancy outcomes in women with isolated borderline oligohydramnios compared to fluid therapy alone.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

西地那非对特发性边缘性羊水过少孕妇妊娠结局的影响:一项随机对照试验。
目的:边缘性羊水过少一直是产科医生处理和咨询的难题。本研究旨在比较西地那非联合液体治疗与单独液体治疗对合并特发性边缘性羊水过少的孕妇妊娠结局和AFI改善的影响。材料与方法:本随机临床试验于2017 - 2020年在伊朗德黑兰Arash妇女医院进行。将51例特发性边缘性羊水过少孕妇分为两组。组1给予液体治疗,组2给予液体治疗加西地那非25 mg,每日3次,连用6周。在随机分组时、治疗后24小时、连续6周每周测量AFI。比较两组间AFI、分娩类型、分娩胎龄及新生儿结局的变化。结果:干预后,两组间AFI变化无统计学意义。母胎结局比较两组间无显著差异。与水合作用组相比,西地那非组干预后AFI中位数(四分位间距)分别在随访24小时(8.5比8,p=0.27)、第1周(9.5比9.1,p=0.74)、第2周(9比10,p=0.12)、第3周(10.4比9.4,p=0.33)、第4周(10.8比9.1,p=0.1)和第5周(10比9.3,p=0.5),但均无统计学意义。结论:研究结果表明,西地那非加液体治疗与单独液体治疗相比,不能改善孤立性边缘性羊水过少妇女的妊娠结局。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
审稿时长
5 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Family & Reproductive Health (JFRH) is the quarterly official journal of Vali–e–Asr Reproductive Health Research Center. This journal features fulllength, peerreviewed papers reporting original research, clinical case histories, review articles, as well as opinions and debates on topical issues. Papers published cover the scientific and medical aspects of reproductive physiology and pathology including genetics, endocrinology, andrology, embryology, gynecologic urology, fetomaternal medicine, oncology, infectious disease, public health, nutrition, surgery, menopause, family planning, infertility, psychiatry–psychology, demographic modeling, perinatalogy–neonatolgy ethics and social issues, and pharmacotherapy. A high scientific and editorial standard is maintained throughout the journal along with a regular rate of publication. All published articles will become the property of the JFRH. The editor and publisher accept no responsibility for the statements expressed by the authors here in. Also they do not guarantee, warrant or endorse any product or service advertised in the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信