Engaging Youth in Public Health: Evaluation of Short-term and Long-term Participation in the PATCH Youth Advocacy Fellowship.

Chelsea J Aeschbach, Mary M Kusch, Amy B Olejniczak, Erica R Koepsel
{"title":"Engaging Youth in Public Health: Evaluation of Short-term and Long-term Participation in the PATCH Youth Advocacy Fellowship.","authors":"Chelsea J Aeschbach,&nbsp;Mary M Kusch,&nbsp;Amy B Olejniczak,&nbsp;Erica R Koepsel","doi":"10.1097/PHH.0000000000001567","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Authentic youth engagement is widely recognized as an efficacious strategy to promote adolescent health.</p><p><strong>Program: </strong>The Providers and Teens Communicating for Health (PATCH) Youth Advocacy Fellowship was created to support Wisconsin's Adolescent Health Program. It strives to bring youth voice to the forefront of adolescent health conversations while also providing young people the knowledge, skills, and opportunities to thrive into adulthood.</p><p><strong>Implementation: </strong>The Fellowship hires and trains Wisconsin youth, aged 12 to 21 years, to be a part of community- and state-based adolescent health conversations. Youth meet regularly as a team for ongoing enrichment and are provided opportunities to consult on adolescent-focused projects and initiatives. They are also responsible for independently completing an advocacy learning series, which culminates in an advocacy plan on a topic of personal interest. The Fellowship has been implemented as an extended 9-month program, as well as an expedited 8-week pilot.</p><p><strong>Evaluation: </strong>An evaluation was conducted to compare the 8-week pilot (summer 2018) with 51 youth and the sequential 9-month Fellowship (2018-2019) with 12 youth. Based on the quantitative analysis of 2 programmatic evaluations (posttraining and postprogram), both program models showed success. Yet, there were distinct differences among self-reported youth outcomes as well as depth and extent of engagement. Across all 14 domains, the 9-month cohort demonstrated consistently higher mean scores. Half of the domains (7) showed statistically significant differences.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>When considering youth engagement, it is important for practitioners to determine the goals, needs, capacity, and resources of both youth and the organization. Engaging youth for shorter-term commitments may serve as an important health education strategy, providing youth important knowledge and skills. Yet, engaging youth for extended periods of time may result in more meaningful engagement, fruitful projects, and substantial changes in positive youth development.</p>","PeriodicalId":296123,"journal":{"name":"Journal of public health management and practice : JPHMP","volume":" ","pages":"E719-E727"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of public health management and practice : JPHMP","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PHH.0000000000001567","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context: Authentic youth engagement is widely recognized as an efficacious strategy to promote adolescent health.

Program: The Providers and Teens Communicating for Health (PATCH) Youth Advocacy Fellowship was created to support Wisconsin's Adolescent Health Program. It strives to bring youth voice to the forefront of adolescent health conversations while also providing young people the knowledge, skills, and opportunities to thrive into adulthood.

Implementation: The Fellowship hires and trains Wisconsin youth, aged 12 to 21 years, to be a part of community- and state-based adolescent health conversations. Youth meet regularly as a team for ongoing enrichment and are provided opportunities to consult on adolescent-focused projects and initiatives. They are also responsible for independently completing an advocacy learning series, which culminates in an advocacy plan on a topic of personal interest. The Fellowship has been implemented as an extended 9-month program, as well as an expedited 8-week pilot.

Evaluation: An evaluation was conducted to compare the 8-week pilot (summer 2018) with 51 youth and the sequential 9-month Fellowship (2018-2019) with 12 youth. Based on the quantitative analysis of 2 programmatic evaluations (posttraining and postprogram), both program models showed success. Yet, there were distinct differences among self-reported youth outcomes as well as depth and extent of engagement. Across all 14 domains, the 9-month cohort demonstrated consistently higher mean scores. Half of the domains (7) showed statistically significant differences.

Discussion: When considering youth engagement, it is important for practitioners to determine the goals, needs, capacity, and resources of both youth and the organization. Engaging youth for shorter-term commitments may serve as an important health education strategy, providing youth important knowledge and skills. Yet, engaging youth for extended periods of time may result in more meaningful engagement, fruitful projects, and substantial changes in positive youth development.

青年参与公共卫生:评估短期和长期参与青年倡议奖学金。
背景:真正的青年参与被广泛认为是促进青少年健康的有效策略。方案:服务提供者和青少年健康交流(PATCH)青年倡导奖学金的创建是为了支持威斯康星州的青少年健康方案。它努力将青年的声音带到青少年健康对话的最前沿,同时也为年轻人提供成长为成年人的知识、技能和机会。实施情况:该奖学金雇用和培训威斯康星州12至21岁的青年,使其成为社区和州一级青少年健康对话的一部分。青少年作为一个团队定期会面,以不断充实自己,并有机会就以青少年为重点的项目和倡议进行咨询。他们还负责独立完成一个倡导学习系列,最终形成一个个人感兴趣的主题的倡导计划。该奖学金已作为一个延长的9个月项目和一个加速的8周试点项目实施。评估:对51名青年参加的为期8周的试点项目(2018年夏季)和12名青年参加的连续9个月的奖学金项目(2018-2019)进行了评估。基于2个项目评估(培训后和项目后)的定量分析,两种项目模式都显示出成功。然而,自我报告的青年成果以及参与的深度和程度存在明显差异。在所有14个领域中,9个月的队列显示出持续较高的平均得分。其中一半域(7个)的差异有统计学意义。讨论:当考虑青年参与时,从业者确定青年和组织的目标、需求、能力和资源是很重要的。让青年参与短期承诺可作为一项重要的卫生教育战略,为青年提供重要的知识和技能。然而,让青年参与更长的时间可能会导致更有意义的参与,成果丰硕的项目,以及积极的青年发展的实质性变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信