Sequencing of Adjuvant Chemoradiation for Advanced Stage Endometrial Cancer: Outcomes and Toxicity Profiles.

Jessica D Arden, Kimberly Marvin, Sirisha R Nandalur, Zaid Al-Wahab, Jayson Field, Jill Gadzinski, Joseph A Rakowski, Barry Rosen, Maha S Jawad
{"title":"Sequencing of Adjuvant Chemoradiation for Advanced Stage Endometrial Cancer: Outcomes and Toxicity Profiles.","authors":"Jessica D Arden,&nbsp;Kimberly Marvin,&nbsp;Sirisha R Nandalur,&nbsp;Zaid Al-Wahab,&nbsp;Jayson Field,&nbsp;Jill Gadzinski,&nbsp;Joseph A Rakowski,&nbsp;Barry Rosen,&nbsp;Maha S Jawad","doi":"10.1097/COC.0000000000000742","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Radiation is frequently added to chemotherapy for adjuvant treatment of advanced stage endometrial cancer. Multiple adjuvant therapy sequencing options exist, and little data is available to compare these. We compared outcomes and toxicities after \"sandwich\" chemoradiation (chemotherapy, then radiation, then chemotherapy) and nonsandwich sequences (chemotherapy then radiation, radiation then chemotherapy, or concurrent chemoradiation).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We recorded baseline characteristics, adjuvant treatment details, clinical outcomes, and toxicities for stage III to IVA patients who underwent surgical staging followed by both adjuvant chemotherapy and radiation therapy at our institution. Effects of adjuvant treatment order (sandwich or nonsandwich) on these outcomes were analyzed. Toxicities were graded according to CTCAE v4.0.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 107 patients with a median follow-up of 3.2 years. Five-year local, regional, and distant recurrence were 7%, 15%, and 33%; disease-free and overall survival were 61% and 68%, respectively. Outcomes did not differ by sequence group. The overall rate of acute toxicity did not differ by sequence group. The overall rate of chronic toxicity was significantly lower for sandwich patients (P<0.001), as were overall rates of chronic genitourinary (P=0.048) and gynecologic (P<0.001) toxicities. There were no grade 4 or 5 acute or chronic toxicities.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Advanced stage endometrial cancer is an aggressive disease and adjuvant chemotherapy and radiation therapy are indicated. Clinical outcomes were similar amongst the different sequences; however, sandwich therapy led to less chronic toxicity, offering an opportunity for improved quality of life in survivorship.</p>","PeriodicalId":501816,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Clinical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"755-761"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1097/COC.0000000000000742","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Clinical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/COC.0000000000000742","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objectives: Radiation is frequently added to chemotherapy for adjuvant treatment of advanced stage endometrial cancer. Multiple adjuvant therapy sequencing options exist, and little data is available to compare these. We compared outcomes and toxicities after "sandwich" chemoradiation (chemotherapy, then radiation, then chemotherapy) and nonsandwich sequences (chemotherapy then radiation, radiation then chemotherapy, or concurrent chemoradiation).

Materials and methods: We recorded baseline characteristics, adjuvant treatment details, clinical outcomes, and toxicities for stage III to IVA patients who underwent surgical staging followed by both adjuvant chemotherapy and radiation therapy at our institution. Effects of adjuvant treatment order (sandwich or nonsandwich) on these outcomes were analyzed. Toxicities were graded according to CTCAE v4.0.

Results: We identified 107 patients with a median follow-up of 3.2 years. Five-year local, regional, and distant recurrence were 7%, 15%, and 33%; disease-free and overall survival were 61% and 68%, respectively. Outcomes did not differ by sequence group. The overall rate of acute toxicity did not differ by sequence group. The overall rate of chronic toxicity was significantly lower for sandwich patients (P<0.001), as were overall rates of chronic genitourinary (P=0.048) and gynecologic (P<0.001) toxicities. There were no grade 4 or 5 acute or chronic toxicities.

Conclusions: Advanced stage endometrial cancer is an aggressive disease and adjuvant chemotherapy and radiation therapy are indicated. Clinical outcomes were similar amongst the different sequences; however, sandwich therapy led to less chronic toxicity, offering an opportunity for improved quality of life in survivorship.

晚期子宫内膜癌的辅助放化疗顺序:结果和毒性概况。
目的:晚期子宫内膜癌的辅助治疗常在化疗的基础上加放疗。目前存在多种辅助治疗序列选择,但很少有数据可用于比较这些选择。我们比较了“夹心”放化疗(化疗、放疗、化疗)和非夹心顺序放化疗(化疗、放疗、化疗或同步放化疗)后的结果和毒性。材料和方法:我们记录了III期至IVA患者的基线特征、辅助治疗细节、临床结果和毒性,这些患者在我院接受了手术分期和辅助化疗和放疗。分析辅助治疗顺序(夹心或非夹心)对这些结果的影响。按照CTCAE v4.0分级。结果:我们确定了107例患者,中位随访时间为3.2年。5年局部、区域和远处复发率分别为7%、15%和33%;无病生存率和总生存率分别为61%和68%。不同序列组的结果无差异。不同序列组的急性毒性发生率无差异。结论:晚期子宫内膜癌是一种侵袭性疾病,需要辅助化疗和放疗。不同序列的临床结果相似;然而,夹心疗法导致更少的慢性毒性,为改善生存质量提供了机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信