Learning in complex, multi-component cognitive systems: Different learning challenges within the same system.

Bonnie L Breining, Nazbanou Nozari, Brenda Rapp
{"title":"Learning in complex, multi-component cognitive systems: Different learning challenges within the same system.","authors":"Bonnie L Breining, Nazbanou Nozari, Brenda Rapp","doi":"10.1037/xlm0000630","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Using word learning as an example of a complex system, we investigated how differences in the structure of the subcomponents in which learning occurs can have significant consequences for the challenge of integrating new information within such systems. Learning a new word involves integrating information into the two key stages/subcomponents of processing within the word production system. In the first stage, multiple semantic features are mapped onto a single word. Conversely, in the second stage, a single word is mapped onto multiple segmental features. We tested whether the unitary goal of word learning leads to different local outcomes in these two stages because of their reversed mapping patterns. Neurotypical individuals (N = 17) learned names and semantic features for pictures of unfamiliar objects presented in semantically related, segmentally related and unrelated blocks. Both similarity types interfered with word learning. However, feature learning was differentially affected within the two subcomponents of word production. Semantic similarity facilitated learning distinctive semantic features (i.e., features unique to each item), whereas segmental similarity facilitated learning shared segmental features (i.e., features common to several items in a block). These results are compatible with an incremental learning model in which learning not only strengthens certain associations but also weakens others according to the local goals of each subcomponent. More generally, they demonstrate that the same overall learning goal can lead to opposite learning outcomes in the subcomponents of a complex system. The general principles uncovered may extend beyond word learning to other complex systems with multiple subcomponents.","PeriodicalId":504300,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition","volume":" ","pages":"1093-1106"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6344326/pdf/nihms972689.pdf","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000630","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/7/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

Using word learning as an example of a complex system, we investigated how differences in the structure of the subcomponents in which learning occurs can have significant consequences for the challenge of integrating new information within such systems. Learning a new word involves integrating information into the two key stages/subcomponents of processing within the word production system. In the first stage, multiple semantic features are mapped onto a single word. Conversely, in the second stage, a single word is mapped onto multiple segmental features. We tested whether the unitary goal of word learning leads to different local outcomes in these two stages because of their reversed mapping patterns. Neurotypical individuals (N = 17) learned names and semantic features for pictures of unfamiliar objects presented in semantically related, segmentally related and unrelated blocks. Both similarity types interfered with word learning. However, feature learning was differentially affected within the two subcomponents of word production. Semantic similarity facilitated learning distinctive semantic features (i.e., features unique to each item), whereas segmental similarity facilitated learning shared segmental features (i.e., features common to several items in a block). These results are compatible with an incremental learning model in which learning not only strengthens certain associations but also weakens others according to the local goals of each subcomponent. More generally, they demonstrate that the same overall learning goal can lead to opposite learning outcomes in the subcomponents of a complex system. The general principles uncovered may extend beyond word learning to other complex systems with multiple subcomponents.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

复杂、多组分认知系统中的学习:同一系统中的不同学习挑战。
使用单词学习作为一个复杂系统的例子,我们研究了学习发生的子组件结构的差异如何对在这样的系统中整合新信息的挑战产生重大影响。学习一个新单词需要将信息整合到单词生成系统中处理的两个关键阶段/子组件中。在第一阶段,将多个语义特征映射到单个单词上。相反,在第二阶段,将单个单词映射到多个分段特征上。我们测试了单词学习的单一目标在这两个阶段是否会导致不同的局部结果,因为它们的反向映射模式。神经正常个体(N = 17)在语义相关、片段相关和不相关的块中学习了不熟悉物体图片的名称和语义特征。两种相似类型都会干扰单词学习。然而,在单词生成的两个子组件中,特征学习受到不同的影响。语义相似有助于学习不同的语义特征(即每个项目独有的特征),而片段相似有助于学习共享的片段特征(即块中几个项目共有的特征)。这些结果与增量学习模型相一致,在增量学习模型中,根据每个子组件的局部目标,学习不仅会加强某些关联,还会削弱其他关联。更一般地说,他们证明了在一个复杂系统的子组件中,相同的总体学习目标可能导致相反的学习结果。所揭示的一般原则可能会扩展到单词学习以外的其他具有多个子组件的复杂系统。(PsycINFO数据库记录(c) 2019 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信