Diagnostic Accuracy of Focused Assessment with Sonography for Blunt Abdominal Trauma in Pediatric Patients Performed by Emergency Medicine Residents versus Radiology Residents.

Advanced Journal of Emergency Medicine Pub Date : 2018-05-08 eCollection Date: 2018-01-01 DOI:10.22114/AJEM.v0i0.89
Farhad Heydari, Ayoub Ashrafi, Mohsen Kolahdouzan
{"title":"Diagnostic Accuracy of Focused Assessment with Sonography for Blunt Abdominal Trauma in Pediatric Patients Performed by Emergency Medicine Residents versus Radiology Residents.","authors":"Farhad Heydari,&nbsp;Ayoub Ashrafi,&nbsp;Mohsen Kolahdouzan","doi":"10.22114/AJEM.v0i0.89","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Focused assessment with sonography for trauma (FAST) has been shown to be useful to detect intraperitoneal free fluid in patients with blunt abdominal trauma (BAT).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We compared the diagnostic accuracy of FAST performed by emergency medicine residents (EMRs) and radiology residents (RRs) in pediatric patients with BAT.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>In this prospective study, pediatric patients with BAT and high energy trauma who were referred to the emergency department (ED) at Al-Zahra and Kashani hospitals in Isfahan, Iran, were evaluated using FAST, first by EMRs and subsequently by RRs. The reports provided by the two resident groups were compared with the final outcome based on the results of the abdominal computed tomography (CT), operative exploration, and clinical observation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 101 patients with a median age of 6.75 ± 3.2 years were enrolled in the study between January 2013 and May 2014. These patients were evaluated using FAST, first by EMRs and subsequently by RRs. A good diagnostic agreement was noted between the results of the FAST scans performed by EMRs and RRs (κ = 0.865, P < 0.001). The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and accuracy in evaluating the intraperitoneal free fluid were 72.2%, 85.5%, 52%, 93.3%, and 83.2%, respectively, when FAST was performed by EMRs and 72.2%, 86.7%, 54.2%, 93.5%, and 84.2%, respectively, when FAST was performed by RRs. No significant differences were seen between the EMR- and RR-performed FAST.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this study, FAST performed by EMRs had acceptable diagnostic value, similar to that performed by RRs, in patients with BAT.</p>","PeriodicalId":7290,"journal":{"name":"Advanced Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":"2 3","pages":"e31"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.22114/AJEM.v0i0.89","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advanced Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22114/AJEM.v0i0.89","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction: Focused assessment with sonography for trauma (FAST) has been shown to be useful to detect intraperitoneal free fluid in patients with blunt abdominal trauma (BAT).

Objective: We compared the diagnostic accuracy of FAST performed by emergency medicine residents (EMRs) and radiology residents (RRs) in pediatric patients with BAT.

Method: In this prospective study, pediatric patients with BAT and high energy trauma who were referred to the emergency department (ED) at Al-Zahra and Kashani hospitals in Isfahan, Iran, were evaluated using FAST, first by EMRs and subsequently by RRs. The reports provided by the two resident groups were compared with the final outcome based on the results of the abdominal computed tomography (CT), operative exploration, and clinical observation.

Results: A total of 101 patients with a median age of 6.75 ± 3.2 years were enrolled in the study between January 2013 and May 2014. These patients were evaluated using FAST, first by EMRs and subsequently by RRs. A good diagnostic agreement was noted between the results of the FAST scans performed by EMRs and RRs (κ = 0.865, P < 0.001). The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and accuracy in evaluating the intraperitoneal free fluid were 72.2%, 85.5%, 52%, 93.3%, and 83.2%, respectively, when FAST was performed by EMRs and 72.2%, 86.7%, 54.2%, 93.5%, and 84.2%, respectively, when FAST was performed by RRs. No significant differences were seen between the EMR- and RR-performed FAST.

Conclusion: In this study, FAST performed by EMRs had acceptable diagnostic value, similar to that performed by RRs, in patients with BAT.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

急诊内科住院医师与放射科住院医师对儿科患者钝性腹部创伤超声聚焦评估的诊断准确性。
引言:创伤超声聚焦评估(FAST)已被证明有助于检测钝性腹部创伤(BAT)患者的腹腔游离液。目的:我们比较急诊医学住院医师(EMRs)和放射学住院医师(RR)对患有BAT的儿科患者进行FAST的诊断准确性。方法:在这项前瞻性研究中,在伊朗伊斯法罕的Al-Zahra和Kashani医院,转诊至急诊科的BAT和高能创伤儿科患者使用FAST进行评估,首先通过EMR,然后通过RR。根据腹部计算机断层扫描(CT)、手术探查和临床观察的结果,将两个住院组提供的报告与最终结果进行比较。结果:在2013年1月至2014年5月期间,共有101名中位年龄为6.75±3.2岁的患者参与了该研究。这些患者使用FAST进行评估,首先通过EMR进行评估,然后通过RR进行评估。EMRs和RR的FAST扫描结果之间存在良好的诊断一致性(κ=0.865,P<0.001)。当EMRs进行FAST时,评估腹膜内游离液的敏感性、特异性、阳性和阴性预测值以及准确性分别为72.2%、85.5%、52%、93.3%和83.2%,当FAST由RR执行时。结论:在本研究中,EMR和RR进行的FAST对BAT患者具有可接受的诊断价值,与RR相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信