Industry-Led Standards, Relational Contracts and Good Faith: Are the UK and Australia Setting the Pace in (Construction) Contract Law?

IF 0.3 Q3 LAW
Liverpool Law Review Pub Date : 2022-01-01 Epub Date: 2022-07-20 DOI:10.1007/s10991-022-09307-5
David Christie, Séverine Saintier, Jessica Viven-Wilksch
{"title":"Industry-Led Standards, Relational Contracts and Good Faith: Are the UK and Australia Setting the Pace in (Construction) Contract Law?","authors":"David Christie,&nbsp;Séverine Saintier,&nbsp;Jessica Viven-Wilksch","doi":"10.1007/s10991-022-09307-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The law of contract is changing. \"Good faith\" and \"relational contracts\" are used by parties more than ever before in commercial disputes. Yet, their definition and what it really means to act in good faith are still unsettled in the UK and Australia, reducing the (judicial and doctrinal) utility and impact of such conceptual tools. In contrast, the construction industry is trying to move forward in policy terms. Over the last 30 years, industry-led initiatives have been working to improve collaboration. In the UK and Australia, new collaborative frameworks contain express provisions asking parties to act with mutual trust and cooperation among other collaborative schemes. Examination of the judicial approach and industry initiatives demonstrates that there is - underpinning both - a <i>project-centric</i> approach (even if that is yet to be fully recognised or articulated). It is the aim of this paper to further articulate this understanding by examining at the judicial and industry positions in the UK and Australia.</p>","PeriodicalId":42661,"journal":{"name":"Liverpool Law Review","volume":"43 2","pages":"287-310"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9299410/pdf/","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Liverpool Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10991-022-09307-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/7/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The law of contract is changing. "Good faith" and "relational contracts" are used by parties more than ever before in commercial disputes. Yet, their definition and what it really means to act in good faith are still unsettled in the UK and Australia, reducing the (judicial and doctrinal) utility and impact of such conceptual tools. In contrast, the construction industry is trying to move forward in policy terms. Over the last 30 years, industry-led initiatives have been working to improve collaboration. In the UK and Australia, new collaborative frameworks contain express provisions asking parties to act with mutual trust and cooperation among other collaborative schemes. Examination of the judicial approach and industry initiatives demonstrates that there is - underpinning both - a project-centric approach (even if that is yet to be fully recognised or articulated). It is the aim of this paper to further articulate this understanding by examining at the judicial and industry positions in the UK and Australia.

行业主导标准、关系合同和诚信:英国和澳大利亚在(建筑)合同法方面是否处于领先地位?
合同法正在发生变化。在商事纠纷中,“诚信”和“关系合同”的使用比以往任何时候都多。然而,它们的定义以及诚信行为的真正含义在英国和澳大利亚仍未确定,这降低了这些概念工具的(司法和理论)效用和影响。相比之下,建筑行业正试图在政策方面取得进展。在过去的30年里,行业主导的倡议一直致力于改善协作。在英国和澳大利亚,新的合作框架包含明确规定,要求各方在其他合作计划之间相互信任和合作。对司法方法和行业举措的审查表明,两者都有一个以项目为中心的方法(即使尚未得到充分承认或阐明)。本文的目的是通过对英国和澳大利亚的司法和行业立场进行审查,进一步阐明这一理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
24
期刊介绍: The Liverpool Law Review is a tri-annual journal of contemporary domestic, European and international legal and social policy issues. The Journal aims to provide articles, commentaries and reviews across a wide range of theoretical and practical legal and social policy matters - including public law, private law, civil and criminal justice, international law, ethics and legal theory. The Journal has many international subscribers and regularly publishes important contributions from the U.K. and abroad. Articles and commentaries are published with sufficient speed to ensure that they are truly current.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信