Current Evidence on Heart Rate Variability Biofeedback as a Complementary Anticraving Intervention.

Nour Alayan, Lucille Eller, Marsha E Bates, Dennis P Carmody
{"title":"Current Evidence on Heart Rate Variability Biofeedback as a Complementary Anticraving Intervention.","authors":"Nour Alayan,&nbsp;Lucille Eller,&nbsp;Marsha E Bates,&nbsp;Dennis P Carmody","doi":"10.1089/acm.2018.0019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The limited success of conventional anticraving interventions encourages research into new treatment strategies. Heart rate variability biofeedback (HRVB), which is based on slowed breathing, was shown to improve symptom severity in various disorders. HRVB, and certain rates of controlled breathing (CB), may offer therapeutic potential as a complementary drug-free treatment option to help control substance craving.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This review evaluated current evidence on the effectiveness of HRVB and CB training as a complementary anticraving intervention, based on guidelines from the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols. Studies that assessed a cardiorespiratory feedback or CB intervention with substance craving as an outcome were selected. Effect sizes were calculated for each study. The Scale for Assessing Scientific Quality of Investigations in Complementary and Alternative Medicine was used to evaluate the quality of each study reviewed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of eight articles remained for final review, including controlled studies with or without randomization, as well as noncontrolled trials. Most studies showed positive results with a variety of methodological quality levels and effect size. Current HRVB studies rated moderately on methodological rigor and showed inconsistent magnitudes of calculated effect size (0.074-0.727) across populations. The largest effect size was found in a nonclinical college population of high food cravers utilizing the most intensive HRVB training time of 240 min.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite the limitations of this review, there is beginning evidence that HRVB and CB training can be of significant therapeutic potential. Larger clinical trials are needed with methodological improvements such as longer treatment duration, adequate control conditions, measures of adherence and compliance, longitudinal examination of craving changes, and more comprehensive methods of craving measurement.</p>","PeriodicalId":520659,"journal":{"name":"Journal of alternative and complementary medicine (New York, N.Y.)","volume":" ","pages":"1039-1050"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1089/acm.2018.0019","citationCount":"20","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of alternative and complementary medicine (New York, N.Y.)","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/acm.2018.0019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/5/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20

Abstract

Background: The limited success of conventional anticraving interventions encourages research into new treatment strategies. Heart rate variability biofeedback (HRVB), which is based on slowed breathing, was shown to improve symptom severity in various disorders. HRVB, and certain rates of controlled breathing (CB), may offer therapeutic potential as a complementary drug-free treatment option to help control substance craving.

Methods: This review evaluated current evidence on the effectiveness of HRVB and CB training as a complementary anticraving intervention, based on guidelines from the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols. Studies that assessed a cardiorespiratory feedback or CB intervention with substance craving as an outcome were selected. Effect sizes were calculated for each study. The Scale for Assessing Scientific Quality of Investigations in Complementary and Alternative Medicine was used to evaluate the quality of each study reviewed.

Results: A total of eight articles remained for final review, including controlled studies with or without randomization, as well as noncontrolled trials. Most studies showed positive results with a variety of methodological quality levels and effect size. Current HRVB studies rated moderately on methodological rigor and showed inconsistent magnitudes of calculated effect size (0.074-0.727) across populations. The largest effect size was found in a nonclinical college population of high food cravers utilizing the most intensive HRVB training time of 240 min.

Conclusions: Despite the limitations of this review, there is beginning evidence that HRVB and CB training can be of significant therapeutic potential. Larger clinical trials are needed with methodological improvements such as longer treatment duration, adequate control conditions, measures of adherence and compliance, longitudinal examination of craving changes, and more comprehensive methods of craving measurement.

Abstract Image

心率变异性生物反馈作为一种补充性抗渴望干预的最新证据。
背景:传统抗渴望干预措施的有限成功鼓励了对新的治疗策略的研究。心率变异性生物反馈(HRVB)是一种基于呼吸减慢的方法,被证明可以改善各种疾病的症状严重程度。HRVB和一定的控制呼吸率(CB)可能作为一种辅助的无药物治疗选择提供治疗潜力,以帮助控制物质渴望。方法:本综述基于系统评价和荟萃分析方案首选报告项目的指南,评估了HRVB和CB训练作为一种补充性抗渴望干预的有效性的现有证据。选择了以物质渴望为结果评估心肺反馈或CB干预的研究。计算每个研究的效应量。补充和替代医学研究科学质量评估量表用于评估每项研究的质量。结果:共有8篇文章仍待最终审查,包括有或没有随机化的对照研究,以及非对照试验。大多数研究都显示了不同方法学质量水平和效应大小的积极结果。目前的HRVB研究对方法的严谨性评价中等,并且在不同人群中显示出不一致的计算效应大小(0.074-0.727)。最大的效应量出现在非临床的大学高食欲人群中,他们使用240分钟的高强度HRVB训练时间。结论:尽管本综述存在局限性,但有初步证据表明HRVB和CB训练具有显著的治疗潜力。更大规模的临床试验需要方法上的改进,如更长的治疗时间,适当的控制条件,依从性和依从性的测量,对渴望变化的纵向检查,以及更全面的渴望测量方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信