[Venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for COVID-19].

Abstract

Background: Since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic global health systems are confronted with a large number of unknown problems. Venovenous (vv) extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in cases of therapy refractive ARDS often represents a last resort treatment. To improve the health care it is necessary to identify possible influencing factors.

Objective: This analysis presents the findings of an ECMO centre and aims to identify potential factors with an impact on vv-ECMO therapy in cases of COVID-19.

Material and methods: Between 03/2020 and 01/2022 n = 96 patients were treated with vv-ECMO in cases of a COVID-19 infection in our center. A retrospective analysis of demographic and health-specific data took place. The patients with fatal treatment outcome (L-group, n = 62) were compared to the surviving patients (Ü-group, n = 34).

Results: Overall n = 34 (35%) of the patients survived the hospital stay. The patients with a fatal treatment outcome had an average age of 56.7 ± 9.5 years compared to the average age of the surviving patients of 47.9 ± 12.9 years. There were n = 72 (75%) males and n = 24 (25%) females among the treated patients, n = 51 (82.3%) of the deceased patients were male and n = 11 (17.7%) were female. The prevalence of pre-existing illnesses like COPD, diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular diseases and chronic renal insufficiency had shown no significant difference between both groups. Also, in relation to the presence of arterial hypertension and obesity we could not prove a negative influence on the treatment outcome. A nicotine abuse in the patient history showed a negative tendency. The most common reasons for the death of patients were respiratory failure, neurological injury, multiorgan failure and sepsis.

Conclusion: The use of vv-ECMO in cases of therapy resistant ARDS in COVID-19 still correlates with a high mortality and as such should only be considered as a last resort of intensive care treatment.According to our expectations we could notice better therapy results for younger patients as well as for women in our patient database. In addition, for most comorbidities we could not prove any negative influence on the therapy outcome. This knowledge could help to identify future high-risk patients.