Prioritize biologically relevant ions for data-independent acquisition (BRI-DIA) in LC-MS/MS-based lipidomics analysis.

Likun Duan, Grace Scheidemantle, Mareca Lodge, Magdalina J Cummings, Eva Pham, Xiaoqiu Wang, Arion Kennedy, Xiaojing Liu
{"title":"Prioritize biologically relevant ions for data-independent acquisition (BRI-DIA) in LC-MS/MS-based lipidomics analysis.","authors":"Likun Duan,&nbsp;Grace Scheidemantle,&nbsp;Mareca Lodge,&nbsp;Magdalina J Cummings,&nbsp;Eva Pham,&nbsp;Xiaoqiu Wang,&nbsp;Arion Kennedy,&nbsp;Xiaojing Liu","doi":"10.1007/s11306-022-01913-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Data-dependent acquisition (DDA) is the most commonly used MS/MS scan method for lipidomics analysis on orbitrap-based instrument. However, MS instrument associated software decide the top N precursors for fragmentation, resulting in stochasticity of precursor selection and compromised consistency and reproducibility. We introduce a novel workflow using biologically relevant lipids to construct inclusion list for data-independent acquisition (DIA), named as BRI-DIA workflow.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To ensure consistent coverage of biologically relevant lipids in LC-MS/MS-based lipidomics analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Biologically relevant ion list was constructed based on LIPID MAPS and lipidome atlas in MS-DIAL 4. Lipids were extracted from mouse tissues and used to assess different MS/MS scan workflow (DDA, BRI-DIA, and hybrid mode) on LC-Orbitrap Exploris 480 mass spectrometer.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>DDA resulted in more MS/MS events, but the total number of unique lipids identified by three methods (DDA, BRI-DIA, and hybrid MS/MS scan mode) is comparable (580 unique lipids across 44 lipid subclasses in mouse liver). Major cardiolipin molecular species were identified by data generated using BRI-DIA and hybrid methods and allowed calculation of cardiolipin compositions, while identification of the most abundant cardiolipin CL72:8 was missing in data generated using DDA method, leading to wrong calculation of cardiolipin composition.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The method of using inclusion list comprised of biologically relevant lipids in DIA MS/MS scan is as efficient as traditional DDA method in profiling lipids, but offers better consistency of lipid identification, compared to DDA method. This study was performed using Orbitrap Exploris 480, and we will further evaluate this workflow on other platforms, and if verified by future work, this biologically relevant ion fragmentation workflow could be routinely used in many studies to improve MS/MS identification capacities.</p>","PeriodicalId":144887,"journal":{"name":"Metabolomics : Official journal of the Metabolomic Society","volume":" ","pages":"55"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Metabolomics : Official journal of the Metabolomic Society","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11306-022-01913-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Introduction: Data-dependent acquisition (DDA) is the most commonly used MS/MS scan method for lipidomics analysis on orbitrap-based instrument. However, MS instrument associated software decide the top N precursors for fragmentation, resulting in stochasticity of precursor selection and compromised consistency and reproducibility. We introduce a novel workflow using biologically relevant lipids to construct inclusion list for data-independent acquisition (DIA), named as BRI-DIA workflow.

Objectives: To ensure consistent coverage of biologically relevant lipids in LC-MS/MS-based lipidomics analysis.

Methods: Biologically relevant ion list was constructed based on LIPID MAPS and lipidome atlas in MS-DIAL 4. Lipids were extracted from mouse tissues and used to assess different MS/MS scan workflow (DDA, BRI-DIA, and hybrid mode) on LC-Orbitrap Exploris 480 mass spectrometer.

Results: DDA resulted in more MS/MS events, but the total number of unique lipids identified by three methods (DDA, BRI-DIA, and hybrid MS/MS scan mode) is comparable (580 unique lipids across 44 lipid subclasses in mouse liver). Major cardiolipin molecular species were identified by data generated using BRI-DIA and hybrid methods and allowed calculation of cardiolipin compositions, while identification of the most abundant cardiolipin CL72:8 was missing in data generated using DDA method, leading to wrong calculation of cardiolipin composition.

Conclusion: The method of using inclusion list comprised of biologically relevant lipids in DIA MS/MS scan is as efficient as traditional DDA method in profiling lipids, but offers better consistency of lipid identification, compared to DDA method. This study was performed using Orbitrap Exploris 480, and we will further evaluate this workflow on other platforms, and if verified by future work, this biologically relevant ion fragmentation workflow could be routinely used in many studies to improve MS/MS identification capacities.

在LC-MS/MS-based脂质组学分析中,优先考虑数据独立采集(BRI-DIA)的生物学相关离子。
数据依赖采集(Data-dependent acquisition, DDA)是在轨道仪上进行脂质组学分析最常用的MS/MS扫描方法。然而,MS仪器的相关软件决定了前N个前体碎片,导致前体选择的随机性和一致性和可重复性受损。本文介绍了一种利用生物学相关脂类构建数据独立采集(DIA)包含列表的新工作流程,称为BRI-DIA工作流程。目的:确保LC-MS/MS-based脂质组学分析中生物学相关脂质的一致覆盖。方法:基于MS-DIAL 4的脂质图谱和脂质组图谱构建生物学相关离子表。从小鼠组织中提取脂质,在LC-Orbitrap Exploris 480质谱仪上评估不同的MS/MS扫描工作流程(DDA、BRI-DIA和混合模式)。结果:DDA导致更多的MS/MS事件,但三种方法(DDA, BRI-DIA和混合MS/MS扫描模式)鉴定的独特脂质总数是相当的(小鼠肝脏中44个脂质亚类中的580种独特脂质)。使用brii - dia和hybrid方法生成的数据对主要的心磷脂分子种类进行了鉴定,并可以计算出心磷脂的组成,而使用DDA方法生成的数据缺少对最丰富的心磷脂CL72:8的鉴定,导致心磷脂组成计算错误。结论:采用由生物相关脂类组成的包含列表进行DIA MS/MS扫描的方法与传统的DDA方法一样有效,但与DDA方法相比,脂类鉴定的一致性更好。这项研究是在Orbitrap Exploris 480上进行的,我们将在其他平台上进一步评估该工作流程,如果通过未来的工作验证,该生物相关的离子碎片工作流程可以在许多研究中常规使用,以提高MS/MS鉴定能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信