The Significance of Para-Aortic Nodal Size and the Role of Adjuvant Systemic Chemotherapy in Cervical Cancer: An Institutional Experience.

Dustin B Manders, Travis T Sims, April Bailey, Lindsay Hwang, Debra L Richardson, David S Miller, Siobhan M Kehoe, Kevin V Albuquerque, Jayanthi S Lea
{"title":"The Significance of Para-Aortic Nodal Size and the Role of Adjuvant Systemic Chemotherapy in Cervical Cancer: An Institutional Experience.","authors":"Dustin B Manders,&nbsp;Travis T Sims,&nbsp;April Bailey,&nbsp;Lindsay Hwang,&nbsp;Debra L Richardson,&nbsp;David S Miller,&nbsp;Siobhan M Kehoe,&nbsp;Kevin V Albuquerque,&nbsp;Jayanthi S Lea","doi":"10.1097/COC.0000000000000458","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Cervical cancer metastatic to the para-aortic lymph nodes (PALNs) carries a poor prognosis. Despite extended-field radiation therapy (EFRT), only 30% to 50% of patients will survive 3 years. We sought to examine the treatment regimens used, associated toxicities, and treatment outcomes in patients with cervical cancer metastatic to PALN.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review was performed of all patients with cervical cancer treated at a single institution between January 1, 2007 and November 1, 2014. Included patients had PALN metastases as the most distant site of disease, and all treatment plans were designated as curative. Excluded patients had other distant disease or treatment plans considered palliative. Standard treatment consisted of EFRT with concurrent platinum-based chemotherapy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-one of 344 patients (14.8%) fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The median age was 48.4 years. Forty-four patients received standard EFRT; 7 also received adjuvant platinum/taxane chemotherapy. Thirty-nine of 51 (76%) of patients achieved a complete response to primary treatment. Twelve of 51 (24%) had persistent disease or progression at the completion of treatment. Of responders, 15 of 39 (38%) recurred for an overall treatment failure rate of 27 of 51 (53%). Nineteen of 27 (70%) of treatment failures occurred outside the radiated field. Adjuvant chemotherapy following EFRT was not predictive of progression-free survival or overall survival. PALN diameter ≥1 cm was a significant negative prognostic indicator for overall survival.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Over half of patients with cervical cancer metastatic to the PALN failed extended-field chemoradiation. Most failures occurred outside the radiated field suggesting PALN involvement is a surrogate marker of systemic disease. These findings underscore the need for effective systemic therapy, especially in patients with PALN ≥1 cm in size.</p>","PeriodicalId":501816,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Clinical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"1225-1230"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1097/COC.0000000000000458","citationCount":"16","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Clinical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/COC.0000000000000458","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

Abstract

Objective: Cervical cancer metastatic to the para-aortic lymph nodes (PALNs) carries a poor prognosis. Despite extended-field radiation therapy (EFRT), only 30% to 50% of patients will survive 3 years. We sought to examine the treatment regimens used, associated toxicities, and treatment outcomes in patients with cervical cancer metastatic to PALN.

Methods: A retrospective review was performed of all patients with cervical cancer treated at a single institution between January 1, 2007 and November 1, 2014. Included patients had PALN metastases as the most distant site of disease, and all treatment plans were designated as curative. Excluded patients had other distant disease or treatment plans considered palliative. Standard treatment consisted of EFRT with concurrent platinum-based chemotherapy.

Results: Fifty-one of 344 patients (14.8%) fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The median age was 48.4 years. Forty-four patients received standard EFRT; 7 also received adjuvant platinum/taxane chemotherapy. Thirty-nine of 51 (76%) of patients achieved a complete response to primary treatment. Twelve of 51 (24%) had persistent disease or progression at the completion of treatment. Of responders, 15 of 39 (38%) recurred for an overall treatment failure rate of 27 of 51 (53%). Nineteen of 27 (70%) of treatment failures occurred outside the radiated field. Adjuvant chemotherapy following EFRT was not predictive of progression-free survival or overall survival. PALN diameter ≥1 cm was a significant negative prognostic indicator for overall survival.

Conclusions: Over half of patients with cervical cancer metastatic to the PALN failed extended-field chemoradiation. Most failures occurred outside the radiated field suggesting PALN involvement is a surrogate marker of systemic disease. These findings underscore the need for effective systemic therapy, especially in patients with PALN ≥1 cm in size.

主动脉旁淋巴结大小的意义和辅助全身化疗在宫颈癌中的作用:一个机构经验。
目的:宫颈癌转移至主动脉旁淋巴结(paln)预后不良。尽管采用了大范围放射治疗(EFRT),但只有30%至50%的患者能存活3年。我们试图检查宫颈癌转移到PALN患者的治疗方案、相关毒性和治疗结果。方法:回顾性分析2007年1月1日至2014年11月1日在同一医院接受治疗的所有宫颈癌患者。纳入的PALN转移为最远处疾病部位的患者,所有治疗方案均被指定为可治愈。排除的患者有其他远期疾病或治疗方案被认为是姑息性的。标准治疗包括EFRT和同步铂基化疗。结果:344例患者中51例(14.8%)符合纳入标准。中位年龄为48.4岁。44例患者接受标准EFRT;7例患者还接受了辅助铂/紫杉烷化疗。51例患者中有39例(76%)对初级治疗达到完全缓解。51例患者中有12例(24%)在治疗结束时病情持续或进展。在应答者中,39例中有15例(38%)复发,51例总治疗失败率为27例(53%)。27例治疗失败中有19例(70%)发生在辐射场之外。EFRT后的辅助化疗不能预测无进展生存期或总生存期。PALN直径≥1 cm是总生存的显著阴性预后指标。结论:超过一半的宫颈癌转移到PALN的患者未能接受大范围放化疗。大多数失败发生在辐射场之外,提示PALN受累是全身性疾病的替代标志。这些发现强调了有效的全身治疗的必要性,特别是对于PALN≥1cm的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信