Optimizing CRISPR/Cas9 Editing of Repetitive Single Nucleotide Variants.

IF 4.9 Q1 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
Frontiers in genome editing Pub Date : 2022-07-05 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fgeed.2022.932434
Inga Usher, Lorena Ligammari, Sara Ahrabi, Emily Hepburn, Calum Connolly, Gareth L Bond, Adrienne M Flanagan, Lucia Cottone
{"title":"Optimizing CRISPR/Cas9 Editing of Repetitive Single Nucleotide Variants.","authors":"Inga Usher,&nbsp;Lorena Ligammari,&nbsp;Sara Ahrabi,&nbsp;Emily Hepburn,&nbsp;Calum Connolly,&nbsp;Gareth L Bond,&nbsp;Adrienne M Flanagan,&nbsp;Lucia Cottone","doi":"10.3389/fgeed.2022.932434","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>CRISPR/Cas9, base editors and prime editors comprise the contemporary genome editing toolbox. Many studies have optimized the use of CRISPR/Cas9, as the original CRISPR genome editing system, in substituting single nucleotides by homology directed repair (HDR), although this remains challenging. Studies describing modifications that improve editing efficiency fall short of isolating clonal cell lines or have not been validated for challenging loci or cell models. We present data from 95 transfections using a colony forming and an immortalized cell line comparing the effect on editing efficiency of donor template modifications, concentration of components, HDR enhancing agents and cold shock. We found that <i>in silico</i> predictions of guide RNA efficiency correlated poorly withactivity in cells. Using NGS and ddPCR we detected editing efficiencies of 5-12% in the transfected populations which fell to 1% on clonal cell line isolation. Our data demonstrate the variability of CRISPR efficiency by cell model, target locus and other factors. Successful genome editing requires a comparison of systems and modifications to develop the optimal protocol for the cell model and locus. We describe the steps in this process in a flowchart for those embarking on genome editing using any system and incorporate validated HDR-boosting modifications for those using CRISPR/Cas9.</p>","PeriodicalId":73086,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in genome editing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9294353/pdf/","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in genome editing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fgeed.2022.932434","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

CRISPR/Cas9, base editors and prime editors comprise the contemporary genome editing toolbox. Many studies have optimized the use of CRISPR/Cas9, as the original CRISPR genome editing system, in substituting single nucleotides by homology directed repair (HDR), although this remains challenging. Studies describing modifications that improve editing efficiency fall short of isolating clonal cell lines or have not been validated for challenging loci or cell models. We present data from 95 transfections using a colony forming and an immortalized cell line comparing the effect on editing efficiency of donor template modifications, concentration of components, HDR enhancing agents and cold shock. We found that in silico predictions of guide RNA efficiency correlated poorly withactivity in cells. Using NGS and ddPCR we detected editing efficiencies of 5-12% in the transfected populations which fell to 1% on clonal cell line isolation. Our data demonstrate the variability of CRISPR efficiency by cell model, target locus and other factors. Successful genome editing requires a comparison of systems and modifications to develop the optimal protocol for the cell model and locus. We describe the steps in this process in a flowchart for those embarking on genome editing using any system and incorporate validated HDR-boosting modifications for those using CRISPR/Cas9.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

优化重复单核苷酸变异的CRISPR/Cas9编辑
CRISPR/Cas9、碱基编辑器和初始编辑器构成了当代基因组编辑工具箱。许多研究优化了CRISPR/Cas9作为最初的CRISPR基因组编辑系统,通过同源定向修复(homology directed repair, HDR)取代单核苷酸的使用,尽管这仍然具有挑战性。描述修饰提高编辑效率的研究缺乏克隆细胞系的分离,或者尚未在具有挑战性的位点或细胞模型中得到验证。我们展示了使用集落形成和永生化细胞系进行的95次转染的数据,比较了供体模板修饰、成分浓度、HDR增强剂和冷休克对编辑效率的影响。我们发现引导RNA效率的计算机预测与细胞中的活性相关性很差。使用NGS和ddPCR,我们检测到在转染的群体中编辑效率为5-12%,在克隆细胞系分离时下降到1%。我们的数据证明了细胞模型、靶基因座和其他因素对CRISPR效率的影响。成功的基因组编辑需要系统和修改的比较,以制定细胞模型和位点的最佳方案。我们在流程图中描述了这个过程中的步骤,适用于那些使用任何系统进行基因组编辑的人,并为使用CRISPR/Cas9的人整合了经过验证的hdr增强修饰。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信