Credibility of YouTube™ videos on root canal treatment in children.

Q3 Dentistry
Nezy Susan Varghese, Joe Mathew Cherian, Abi M Thomas
{"title":"Credibility of YouTube™ videos on root canal treatment in children.","authors":"Nezy Susan Varghese,&nbsp;Joe Mathew Cherian,&nbsp;Abi M Thomas","doi":"10.4103/jisppd.jisppd_171_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A lot of videos on root canal treatment in children are available on YouTube™ but no quality checks are present. Addressing this is critical so that parents and dentists know why root canal in children is important including the explanation of procedural steps regarding treatment undertaken.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim of this study is to analyze and grade YouTube™ videos on root canal treatment in children and assess whether it provides beneficial information for patients and dentists.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Variables such as number of views, duration (minute), days since upload, number of comments, number of likes, number of dislikes, interaction index, and viewing rate were tabulated for selected 57 videos.</p><p><strong>Statistical: </strong></p><p><strong>Analysis: </strong>Selected videos were statistically analyzed using a 15-point scoring system and evaluated using SPSS software. Finally, the obtained data sets were classified as low-, moderate-, and high-content videos. Fisher's exact test was used to compare between proportions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Based on the tabulated variables, most of the videos were low (n = 31) and moderate content (n = 24), which dentists mostly uploaded. There was no statistical significance between the video types and content score groups (P > 0.05). The most frequently mentioned issues were procedure (84.21%), obturating materials (75.44%), and etiology (63.16%). The least mentioned subjects were indications (24.56%) and importance (22.81%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>From this study, YouTube™ videos on root canal treatment in children were of low and moderate quality. Hence, high-quality videos are essential for providing awareness among patients and dentists.</p>","PeriodicalId":35797,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry","volume":"40 2","pages":"154-158"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jisppd.jisppd_171_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: A lot of videos on root canal treatment in children are available on YouTube™ but no quality checks are present. Addressing this is critical so that parents and dentists know why root canal in children is important including the explanation of procedural steps regarding treatment undertaken.

Aim: The aim of this study is to analyze and grade YouTube™ videos on root canal treatment in children and assess whether it provides beneficial information for patients and dentists.

Materials and methods: Variables such as number of views, duration (minute), days since upload, number of comments, number of likes, number of dislikes, interaction index, and viewing rate were tabulated for selected 57 videos.

Statistical:

Analysis: Selected videos were statistically analyzed using a 15-point scoring system and evaluated using SPSS software. Finally, the obtained data sets were classified as low-, moderate-, and high-content videos. Fisher's exact test was used to compare between proportions.

Results: Based on the tabulated variables, most of the videos were low (n = 31) and moderate content (n = 24), which dentists mostly uploaded. There was no statistical significance between the video types and content score groups (P > 0.05). The most frequently mentioned issues were procedure (84.21%), obturating materials (75.44%), and etiology (63.16%). The least mentioned subjects were indications (24.56%) and importance (22.81%).

Conclusion: From this study, YouTube™ videos on root canal treatment in children were of low and moderate quality. Hence, high-quality videos are essential for providing awareness among patients and dentists.

YouTube™儿童根管治疗视频的可信度。
背景:YouTube™上有很多关于儿童根管治疗的视频,但没有质量检查。解决这一问题至关重要,以便家长和牙医知道为什么儿童根管治疗很重要,包括解释所进行治疗的程序步骤。目的:本研究的目的是对YouTube™儿童根管治疗视频进行分析和评分,并评估它是否为患者和牙医提供了有益的信息。材料与方法:选取57个视频,制作观看数、时长(分钟)、上传天数、评论数、点赞数、不喜欢数、互动指数、观看率等变量。统计:分析:选取的视频采用15分制进行统计分析,并使用SPSS软件进行评估。最后,将获得的数据集分为低、中、高内容视频。费雪精确检验用于比较比例。结果:从表列变量来看,视频内容以低内容(n = 31)和中等内容(n = 24)居多,是牙医上传最多的视频。视频类型和内容评分组间差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。最常被提及的问题是手术(84.21%)、封闭材料(75.44%)和病因(63.16%)。被提及最少的是指征(24.56%)和重要性(22.81%)。结论:本研究中,YouTube™儿童根管治疗视频质量为中低。因此,高质量的视频对于提高患者和牙医的认识至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
54
审稿时长
39 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry (ISSN - 0970-4388) is the official organ of Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry. The journal publishes original articles and case reports pertaining to pediatric and preventive dentistry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信