Benchmarking public policies to create healthy food environments compared to best practice: the Healthy Food Environment Policy Index in Guatemala.

Carmen María Sánchez-Nóchez, Manuel Ramirez-Zea, Stefanie Vandevijvere, María Fernanda Kroker-Lobos
{"title":"Benchmarking public policies to create healthy food environments compared to best practice: the Healthy Food Environment Policy Index in Guatemala.","authors":"Carmen María Sánchez-Nóchez,&nbsp;Manuel Ramirez-Zea,&nbsp;Stefanie Vandevijvere,&nbsp;María Fernanda Kroker-Lobos","doi":"10.1186/s13690-022-00928-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Benchmarking the implementation of healthy food environment public policies against international best practices may accelerate the government response to prevent obesity and non-communicable diseases (NCDs) in the countries. The aim of the study was to determine the extent of food environment policy implementation in Guatemala and to identify and prioritize actions for the government to accelerate their implementation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The INFORMAS Healthy Food Environment Policy Index (Food-EPI from the International Network for Food and Obesity/NCDs Research, Monitoring and Action Support) was used. Evidence of implementation for 50 good practice indicators within the seven food policies and six infrastructure support domains was compiled, and subsequently validated by Guatemalan government officials. A national civil society expert panel on public health and nutrition performed an online assessment of the implementation of healthy food environment policies against best international practices. The level of agreement among evaluators was measured using the Gwet second order agreement coefficient (AC2). The expert panel recommended actions for each indicator during on-site workshops and those actions were prioritized by importance and achievability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The expert panel rated implementation at zero for 26% of the indicators, very low for 28% of indicators, low for 42%, and medium for 4% of indicators (none were rated high). Indicators at medium implementation were related to the use of evidence for developing policies and ingredient list/nutrition information panels on packaged foods. Seventy-seven actions were recommended prioritizing the top 10 for immediate action. The Gwet AC2 was 0.73 (95% CI 0.67-0.80), indicating a good concordance among experts.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In the Food-EPI of Guatemala, almost all indicators of good practice had a low or less level of implementation. The expert panel proposed 12 priority actions to accelerate policy implementation to tackle obesity and NCDs in the country.</p>","PeriodicalId":365748,"journal":{"name":"Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique","volume":" ","pages":"174"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9295498/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13690-022-00928-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Benchmarking the implementation of healthy food environment public policies against international best practices may accelerate the government response to prevent obesity and non-communicable diseases (NCDs) in the countries. The aim of the study was to determine the extent of food environment policy implementation in Guatemala and to identify and prioritize actions for the government to accelerate their implementation.

Methods: The INFORMAS Healthy Food Environment Policy Index (Food-EPI from the International Network for Food and Obesity/NCDs Research, Monitoring and Action Support) was used. Evidence of implementation for 50 good practice indicators within the seven food policies and six infrastructure support domains was compiled, and subsequently validated by Guatemalan government officials. A national civil society expert panel on public health and nutrition performed an online assessment of the implementation of healthy food environment policies against best international practices. The level of agreement among evaluators was measured using the Gwet second order agreement coefficient (AC2). The expert panel recommended actions for each indicator during on-site workshops and those actions were prioritized by importance and achievability.

Results: The expert panel rated implementation at zero for 26% of the indicators, very low for 28% of indicators, low for 42%, and medium for 4% of indicators (none were rated high). Indicators at medium implementation were related to the use of evidence for developing policies and ingredient list/nutrition information panels on packaged foods. Seventy-seven actions were recommended prioritizing the top 10 for immediate action. The Gwet AC2 was 0.73 (95% CI 0.67-0.80), indicating a good concordance among experts.

Conclusions: In the Food-EPI of Guatemala, almost all indicators of good practice had a low or less level of implementation. The expert panel proposed 12 priority actions to accelerate policy implementation to tackle obesity and NCDs in the country.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

将公共政策作为基准,与最佳做法进行比较,创造健康食品环境:危地马拉健康食品环境政策指数。
背景:将健康食品环境公共政策的实施与国际最佳做法进行比较,可能会加快各国政府在预防肥胖和非传染性疾病方面的反应。该研究的目的是确定危地马拉食品环境政策实施的程度,并确定政府加速实施这些政策的行动的优先次序。方法:采用INFORMAS健康食品环境政策指数(来自国际食品与肥胖/非传染性疾病研究、监测和行动支持网络的食品epi)。编制了7项粮食政策和6项基础设施支持领域内50项良好做法指标的实施证据,随后由危地马拉政府官员进行了验证。一个国家民间社会公共卫生和营养问题专家小组根据最佳国际做法对健康食品环境政策的执行情况进行了在线评估。评价者之间的一致程度采用Gwet二阶一致系数(AC2)来衡量。专家小组在现场讲习班期间为每个指标提出了行动建议,并按重要性和可实现性对这些行动进行了优先排序。结果:专家组对26%的指标评价为零,28%的指标评价为极低,42%的指标评价为低,4%的指标评价为中(没有一个评价高)。中期执行的指标与使用证据制定政策和包装食品的成分表/营养信息面板有关。建议采取77项行动,优先考虑需要立即采取的前10项行动。Gwet AC2为0.73 (95% CI 0.67 ~ 0.80),表明专家间一致性较好。结论:在危地马拉的食品epi中,几乎所有良好做法指标的执行水平都很低或更低。专家小组提出了12项优先行动,以加快政策实施,解决该国的肥胖和非传染性疾病问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信