Observational management of Grade II or higher blunt traumatic thoracic aortic injury: 15 years of experience at a single suburban institution.

Q3 Medicine
Jin Bong Ye, Jin Young Lee, Jin Suk Lee, Se Heon Kim, Hanlim Choi, Yook Kim, Soo Young Yoon, Young Hoon Sul, Jung Hee Choi
{"title":"Observational management of Grade II or higher blunt traumatic thoracic aortic injury: 15 years of experience at a single suburban institution.","authors":"Jin Bong Ye,&nbsp;Jin Young Lee,&nbsp;Jin Suk Lee,&nbsp;Se Heon Kim,&nbsp;Hanlim Choi,&nbsp;Yook Kim,&nbsp;Soo Young Yoon,&nbsp;Young Hoon Sul,&nbsp;Jung Hee Choi","doi":"10.4103/ijciis.ijciis_89_21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We aimed to investigate the outcomes after delayed management of ≥ Grade II blunt traumatic thoracic aortic injury (BTAI).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between January 2005 and December 2019, we retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 21 patients with ≥ Grade II thoracic aortic injury resulting from blunt trauma. Twelve patients underwent observation for the injury, whereas nine patients were transferred immediately after the diagnosis. Patients were divided into a nonoperative management group (<i>n</i> = 7) and delayed repair group (<i>n</i> = 5) based on whether they underwent thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair or surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The most common dissection type was DeBakey classification IIIa (<i>n</i> = 9). Five patients underwent delayed surgery (including aneurysm repair), with observation periods ranging from 1 day to 36 months. The delayed repair group exhibited higher injury severity scores than the nonoperative management group (<i>n</i> = 7). The nonoperative management group was followed-up with blood pressure management without a change in status for a period ranging from 3 to 96 months.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings indicated that conservative management may be appropriate for select patients with Grade II/III BTAI, especially those exhibiting hemodynamic stability with anti-impulse therapy and minimally sized pseudoaneurysms. However, further studies are required to identify the risk factors for injury progression and long-term outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":13938,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Critical Illness and Injury Science","volume":"12 2","pages":"101-105"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9285127/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Critical Illness and Injury Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijciis.ijciis_89_21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/6/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: We aimed to investigate the outcomes after delayed management of ≥ Grade II blunt traumatic thoracic aortic injury (BTAI).

Methods: Between January 2005 and December 2019, we retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 21 patients with ≥ Grade II thoracic aortic injury resulting from blunt trauma. Twelve patients underwent observation for the injury, whereas nine patients were transferred immediately after the diagnosis. Patients were divided into a nonoperative management group (n = 7) and delayed repair group (n = 5) based on whether they underwent thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair or surgery.

Results: The most common dissection type was DeBakey classification IIIa (n = 9). Five patients underwent delayed surgery (including aneurysm repair), with observation periods ranging from 1 day to 36 months. The delayed repair group exhibited higher injury severity scores than the nonoperative management group (n = 7). The nonoperative management group was followed-up with blood pressure management without a change in status for a period ranging from 3 to 96 months.

Conclusions: Our findings indicated that conservative management may be appropriate for select patients with Grade II/III BTAI, especially those exhibiting hemodynamic stability with anti-impulse therapy and minimally sized pseudoaneurysms. However, further studies are required to identify the risk factors for injury progression and long-term outcomes.

II级或更高级别钝性外伤性胸主动脉损伤的观察性管理:在一家郊区机构的15年经验。
背景:我们的目的是研究≥II级钝性外伤性胸主动脉损伤(BTAI)延迟治疗后的结果。方法:回顾性分析2005年1月至2019年12月期间21例≥II级钝性胸主动脉损伤患者的医疗记录。12例因伤留观,9例诊断后立即转院。根据患者是否接受了胸腔血管内动脉瘤修复或手术,将患者分为非手术治疗组(n = 7)和延迟修复组(n = 5)。结果:最常见的夹层类型为DeBakey IIIa型(n = 9)。5例患者接受了延期手术(包括动脉瘤修复),观察时间从1天到36个月不等。延迟修复组损伤严重程度评分高于非手术治疗组(n = 7)。非手术治疗组随访3 - 96个月,血压状况无变化。结论:我们的研究结果表明,保守治疗可能适用于II/III级BTAI患者,特别是那些通过抗冲动治疗和最小尺寸假性动脉瘤表现出血流动力学稳定性的患者。然而,需要进一步的研究来确定损伤进展和长期结果的危险因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
期刊介绍: IJCIIS encourages research, education and dissemination of knowledge in the field of Critical Illness and Injury Science across the world thus promoting translational research by striking a synergy between basic science, clinical medicine and public health. The Journal intends to bring together scientists and academicians in the emergency intensive care and promote translational synergy between Laboratory Science, Clinical Medicine and Public Health. The Journal invites Original Articles, Clinical Investigations, Epidemiological Analysis, Data Protocols, Case Reports, Clinical Photographs, review articles and special commentaries. Students, Residents, Academicians, Public Health experts and scientists are all encouraged to be a part of this initiative by contributing, reviewing and promoting scientific works and science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信