Healthcare professionals' perceptions of interprofessional teamwork in the emergency department: a critical incident study.

Jenny Milton, Annette Erichsen Andersson, N David Åberg, Brigid M Gillespie, Lena Oxelmark
{"title":"Healthcare professionals' perceptions of interprofessional teamwork in the emergency department: a critical incident study.","authors":"Jenny Milton,&nbsp;Annette Erichsen Andersson,&nbsp;N David Åberg,&nbsp;Brigid M Gillespie,&nbsp;Lena Oxelmark","doi":"10.1186/s13049-022-01034-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Interprofessional teams contribute to patient safety during clinical care. However, little is known about how interprofessional teams manage and cope with critical incidents in the emergency department (ED). Therefore, the study aimed to describe healthcare professionals (HCPs) perceptions of critical incidents linked to the enablers of and barriers to interprofessional teamwork in a high-risk setting, the ED.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Individual interviews with HCPs regarding events at the ED were held during the period of May 2019-January 2020. The Critical Incident Technique approach was used to guide the interviews and the qualitative analysis. Data were analyzed inductively using qualitative content analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Interview participants (n = 28) included 7 physicians (25%), 12 registered nurses (43%), 7 nurse assistants (25%) and 2 administrators (7%). Overall, 108 critical incidents were described. Eight categories that described functional and dysfunctional experiences within interprofessional teamwork were identified: salience of reflection; professional experience makes a difference; demanding physical and psychosocial work environment; balancing communication demands; lacking management support, structure, and planning; tensions between professional role and responsibility; different views on interprofessional teamwork; and confidence in interprofessional team members.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Findings of this study indicate that poor ED-specific communication and limited professional experience are essential factors in handling critical incidents related to interprofessional teamwork. An important aspect of critical incident management is the ergonomics of the physical work environment and how it enables interprofessional teamwork. This study emphasizes the factors enabling interprofessional teamwork to manage critical incidents in the complex working environment of the ED.</p>","PeriodicalId":501057,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"46"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9287907/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13049-022-01034-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Interprofessional teams contribute to patient safety during clinical care. However, little is known about how interprofessional teams manage and cope with critical incidents in the emergency department (ED). Therefore, the study aimed to describe healthcare professionals (HCPs) perceptions of critical incidents linked to the enablers of and barriers to interprofessional teamwork in a high-risk setting, the ED.

Methods: Individual interviews with HCPs regarding events at the ED were held during the period of May 2019-January 2020. The Critical Incident Technique approach was used to guide the interviews and the qualitative analysis. Data were analyzed inductively using qualitative content analysis.

Results: Interview participants (n = 28) included 7 physicians (25%), 12 registered nurses (43%), 7 nurse assistants (25%) and 2 administrators (7%). Overall, 108 critical incidents were described. Eight categories that described functional and dysfunctional experiences within interprofessional teamwork were identified: salience of reflection; professional experience makes a difference; demanding physical and psychosocial work environment; balancing communication demands; lacking management support, structure, and planning; tensions between professional role and responsibility; different views on interprofessional teamwork; and confidence in interprofessional team members.

Conclusion: Findings of this study indicate that poor ED-specific communication and limited professional experience are essential factors in handling critical incidents related to interprofessional teamwork. An important aspect of critical incident management is the ergonomics of the physical work environment and how it enables interprofessional teamwork. This study emphasizes the factors enabling interprofessional teamwork to manage critical incidents in the complex working environment of the ED.

急诊科医护人员对跨专业团队合作的看法:一项重大事件研究。
背景:跨专业团队有助于临床护理期间患者的安全。然而,人们对跨专业团队如何管理和应对急诊科(ED)的重大事件知之甚少。因此,该研究旨在描述医疗保健专业人员(HCPs)对高风险环境中跨专业团队合作的促成因素和障碍相关的关键事件的看法。方法:在2019年5月至2020年1月期间,对医疗保健专业人员进行了关于ED事件的个人访谈。使用关键事件技术方法来指导访谈和定性分析。采用定性含量分析法对资料进行归纳分析。结果:访谈对象28人,其中医生7人(25%),注册护士12人(43%),护理助理7人(25%),管理人员2人(7%)。总共描述了108起关键事件。在跨专业团队合作中,描述功能和功能失调体验的八个类别被确定:反思的显著性;专业经验很重要;苛刻的生理和心理工作环境;平衡沟通需求;缺乏管理支持、结构和规划的;职业角色和责任之间的紧张关系;对跨专业团队合作的不同看法以及对跨专业团队成员的信心。结论:本研究结果表明,ed特有的沟通不良和有限的专业经验是处理与跨专业团队合作相关的关键事件的重要因素。关键事件管理的一个重要方面是物理工作环境的人体工程学,以及它如何实现跨专业团队合作。本研究强调在急诊科复杂的工作环境中,跨专业团队合作管理重大事件的因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信