Efficacy of Prophylactic Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy with Delayed Primary Closure for Contaminated Abdominal Wounds.

Surgery Research and Practice Pub Date : 2022-11-14 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2022/6767570
Yo Sato, Eiji Sunami, Kenichiro Hirano, Motoko Takahashi, Shin-Ichi Kosugi
{"title":"Efficacy of Prophylactic Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy with Delayed Primary Closure for Contaminated Abdominal Wounds.","authors":"Yo Sato,&nbsp;Eiji Sunami,&nbsp;Kenichiro Hirano,&nbsp;Motoko Takahashi,&nbsp;Shin-Ichi Kosugi","doi":"10.1155/2022/6767570","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Prophylactic negative-pressure wound therapy (NPWT) to prevent surgical site infection (SSI) may be effective for severely contaminated wounds. We investigated the safety and efficacy of NPWT with delayed primary closure (DPC) for preventing SSI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>For patients with contaminated and dirty/infected surgical wounds after an emergency laparotomy, the abdominal fascia was closed with antibacterial absorbent threads and the skin was left open. Negative pressure (-80 mmHg) was applied through the polyurethane foam, which was replaced on postoperative days 3 and 7. DPC was performed when sufficient granulation was observed. The duration and adverse events of NPWT, the development of SSI, and the postoperative hospital stay were retrospectively reviewed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We analyzed the cases of patients with contaminated (<i>n</i> = 15) and dirty/infected wounds (<i>n</i> = 7). The median duration of NPWT was 7 days (range 5-11 days). NPWT was discontinued in one (4.5%) patient due to wound traction pain. SSI developed in seven patients (31.8%), with incisional SSI in one (4.5%) and organ/space SSI in six (27.3%). The median postoperative hospital stay was 17 days (range 7-91 days). There was no significant relationship between postoperative hospital stay and wound classification (<i>P</i>=0.17) or type of SSI (<i>P</i>=0.07).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Prophylactic NPWT with DPC was feasible and may be particularly suitable for severely contaminated wounds, with a low incidence of incisional SSI.</p>","PeriodicalId":30584,"journal":{"name":"Surgery Research and Practice","volume":" ","pages":"6767570"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9678480/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgery Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/6767570","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Prophylactic negative-pressure wound therapy (NPWT) to prevent surgical site infection (SSI) may be effective for severely contaminated wounds. We investigated the safety and efficacy of NPWT with delayed primary closure (DPC) for preventing SSI.

Methods: For patients with contaminated and dirty/infected surgical wounds after an emergency laparotomy, the abdominal fascia was closed with antibacterial absorbent threads and the skin was left open. Negative pressure (-80 mmHg) was applied through the polyurethane foam, which was replaced on postoperative days 3 and 7. DPC was performed when sufficient granulation was observed. The duration and adverse events of NPWT, the development of SSI, and the postoperative hospital stay were retrospectively reviewed.

Results: We analyzed the cases of patients with contaminated (n = 15) and dirty/infected wounds (n = 7). The median duration of NPWT was 7 days (range 5-11 days). NPWT was discontinued in one (4.5%) patient due to wound traction pain. SSI developed in seven patients (31.8%), with incisional SSI in one (4.5%) and organ/space SSI in six (27.3%). The median postoperative hospital stay was 17 days (range 7-91 days). There was no significant relationship between postoperative hospital stay and wound classification (P=0.17) or type of SSI (P=0.07).

Conclusion: Prophylactic NPWT with DPC was feasible and may be particularly suitable for severely contaminated wounds, with a low incidence of incisional SSI.

预防性负压创面延迟一期封闭治疗腹部污染创面的疗效观察。
背景:预防性负压伤口治疗(NPWT)预防手术部位感染(SSI)可能对严重污染的伤口有效。我们研究了NPWT延迟初级闭合(DPC)预防SSI的安全性和有效性。方法:对急诊开腹术后手术伤口污染、脏污/感染的患者,采用抗菌吸收线缝合腹筋膜,保持皮肤开放。通过聚氨酯泡沫施加负压(-80 mmHg),在术后第3天和第7天更换。当观察到足够的造粒时进行DPC。回顾性回顾NPWT的持续时间和不良事件、SSI的发展和术后住院时间。结果:我们分析了污染伤口(n = 15)和脏/感染伤口(n = 7)的病例。NPWT的中位持续时间为7天(范围5-11天)。1例(4.5%)患者因伤口牵引疼痛而停用NPWT。7例(31.8%)患者发生SSI, 1例(4.5%)发生切口SSI, 6例(27.3%)发生器官/间隙SSI。术后住院时间中位数为17天(范围7-91天)。术后住院时间与伤口分类(P=0.17)和SSI类型(P=0.07)无显著相关性。结论:DPC预防性NPWT是可行的,尤其适用于严重污染创面,切口SSI发生率低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
期刊介绍: Surgery Research and Practice is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that provides a forum for surgeons and the surgical research community. The journal publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies focusing on clinical and laboratory research relevant to surgical practice and teaching, with an emphasis on findings directly affecting surgical management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信