Conventional Karyotyping and Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization for Detection of Chromosomal Abnormalities in Multiple Myeloma.

IF 1.3 Q4 HEMATOLOGY
Journal of hematology Pub Date : 2022-06-01 Epub Date: 2022-06-27 DOI:10.14740/jh1007
Matthew Crabtree, Jennifer Cai, Xin Qing
{"title":"Conventional Karyotyping and Fluorescence <i>In Situ</i> Hybridization for Detection of Chromosomal Abnormalities in Multiple Myeloma.","authors":"Matthew Crabtree,&nbsp;Jennifer Cai,&nbsp;Xin Qing","doi":"10.14740/jh1007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Multiple myeloma (MM) is a genetically heterogeneous disease, with cytogenetic findings that determine disease behavior. Genetic abnormalities can be assessed by fluorescence <i>in situ</i> hybridization (FISH) analysis and/or G-banded karyotyping. The two methods produce unique and overlapping information, and the clinical utility of using both is investigated here.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Seventy patients diagnosed with MM at a hospital in Southern California were retrospectively reviewed for the FISH and G-banded karyotyping results obtained from bone marrow specimens.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Karyotype was normal in 71% (50/70), abnormal in 27% (19/70), and inadequate in 1% (1/70). Among patients with abnormal karyotype, FISH provided additional information about genetic aberrations in 95% of cases (18/19). Among cases with abnormal FISH, karyotype provided additional information about genetic aberrations in 27% of cases (18/66). When numerical abnormalities were present (detected by FISH and/or karyotype), FISH detected them in 95% (54/57), of which karyotype missed 70% (38/54) of the time. Karyotyping detected numerical abnormalities in 33% (19/57), which FISH missed 16% (3/19) of the time.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Karyotyping and FISH analysis in MM each provide unique information. For most patients, performing both tests together will provide more information than either test alone.</p>","PeriodicalId":15964,"journal":{"name":"Journal of hematology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/56/9b/jh-11-087.PMC9275438.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of hematology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14740/jh1007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/6/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Multiple myeloma (MM) is a genetically heterogeneous disease, with cytogenetic findings that determine disease behavior. Genetic abnormalities can be assessed by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis and/or G-banded karyotyping. The two methods produce unique and overlapping information, and the clinical utility of using both is investigated here.

Methods: Seventy patients diagnosed with MM at a hospital in Southern California were retrospectively reviewed for the FISH and G-banded karyotyping results obtained from bone marrow specimens.

Results: Karyotype was normal in 71% (50/70), abnormal in 27% (19/70), and inadequate in 1% (1/70). Among patients with abnormal karyotype, FISH provided additional information about genetic aberrations in 95% of cases (18/19). Among cases with abnormal FISH, karyotype provided additional information about genetic aberrations in 27% of cases (18/66). When numerical abnormalities were present (detected by FISH and/or karyotype), FISH detected them in 95% (54/57), of which karyotype missed 70% (38/54) of the time. Karyotyping detected numerical abnormalities in 33% (19/57), which FISH missed 16% (3/19) of the time.

Conclusions: Karyotyping and FISH analysis in MM each provide unique information. For most patients, performing both tests together will provide more information than either test alone.

常规核型和荧光原位杂交检测多发性骨髓瘤染色体异常。
背景:多发性骨髓瘤(MM)是一种遗传异质性疾病,其细胞遗传学结果决定了疾病行为。遗传异常可以通过荧光原位杂交(FISH)分析和/或g带核型来评估。这两种方法产生独特和重叠的信息,并在此研究两者的临床应用。方法:回顾性分析南加州一家医院诊断为MM的70例患者骨髓标本的FISH和g带核型结果。结果:核型正常者占71%(50/70),异常者占27%(19/70),不正常者占1%(1/70)。在核型异常的患者中,95%的病例(18/19)FISH提供了遗传畸变的额外信息。在FISH异常的病例中,核型提供了27%的遗传异常的额外信息(18/66)。当存在数值异常(FISH和/或核型检测)时,95% (54/57)FISH检测到异常,其中核型缺失70%(38/54)。核型检出数值异常的比例为33% (19/57),FISH漏检率为16%(3/19)。结论:MM的核型分析和FISH分析各自提供了独特的信息。对于大多数患者来说,同时进行这两项检查比单独进行任何一项检查提供的信息更多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of hematology
Journal of hematology HEMATOLOGY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信