Supratentorial cortical ependymoma: A systematic literature review and case illustration.

IF 0.9 Q4 ONCOLOGY
Rare Tumors Pub Date : 2022-07-08 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1177/20363613221112432
Joshua A Cuoco, Andrew C Strohman, Brittany M Stopa, Michael S Stump, John J Entwistle, Mark R Witcher, Adeolu L Olasunkanmi
{"title":"Supratentorial cortical ependymoma: A systematic literature review and case illustration.","authors":"Joshua A Cuoco,&nbsp;Andrew C Strohman,&nbsp;Brittany M Stopa,&nbsp;Michael S Stump,&nbsp;John J Entwistle,&nbsp;Mark R Witcher,&nbsp;Adeolu L Olasunkanmi","doi":"10.1177/20363613221112432","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cortical ependymomas are currently not considered a subgroup of supratentorial ependymomas; however, there is a growing body of literature investigating the natural history of these lesions compared to supratentorial ependymomas. We performed a systematic literature review of cortical ependymomas with a focus on the natural history, clinical characteristics, and clinical outcomes of these lesions as compared to supratentorial ependymomas. Our search revealed 153 unique cases of cortical ependymomas. The mean age on presentation was 21.2 years. Males and females comprised 58.8% (90/153) and 41.2% (63/153) of cases, respectively. The most common presenting symptom was seizure activity occurring in 44.4% of the cohort (68/153). The recently recognized <i>C11orf95-RELA</i> fusion was identified in 13.7% of the cohort (21/153) and 95.5% of cases (21/22) reporting molecular characterization. World Health Organization grades 2 and 3 were reported in 52.3% (79/151) and 47.7% (72/151) of cases, respectively. The frontal lobe was involved in the majority of cases (54.9%, 84/153). Gross total resection was achieved in 80.4% of cases (123/153). Tumor recurrence was identified in 27.7% of cases (39/141). Mean clinical follow-up was 41.3 months. Mean overall survival of patients who expired was 27.4 months whereas mean progression-free survival was 15.0 months. Comparatively, cortical ependymomas with <i>C11orf95</i>-<i>RELA</i> fusions and supratentorial ependymomas with <i>C11orf95 RELA</i> fusions exhibited differing clinical outcomes. Further studies with larger sample sizes are necessary to investigate the significance of <i>RELA</i> fusions on survival in cortical ependymomas and to determine whether cortical ependymomas with <i>C11orf95</i>-<i>RELA</i> fusions should be classified as a distinct entity.</p>","PeriodicalId":46078,"journal":{"name":"Rare Tumors","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/bd/87/10.1177_20363613221112432.PMC9274435.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rare Tumors","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20363613221112432","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Cortical ependymomas are currently not considered a subgroup of supratentorial ependymomas; however, there is a growing body of literature investigating the natural history of these lesions compared to supratentorial ependymomas. We performed a systematic literature review of cortical ependymomas with a focus on the natural history, clinical characteristics, and clinical outcomes of these lesions as compared to supratentorial ependymomas. Our search revealed 153 unique cases of cortical ependymomas. The mean age on presentation was 21.2 years. Males and females comprised 58.8% (90/153) and 41.2% (63/153) of cases, respectively. The most common presenting symptom was seizure activity occurring in 44.4% of the cohort (68/153). The recently recognized C11orf95-RELA fusion was identified in 13.7% of the cohort (21/153) and 95.5% of cases (21/22) reporting molecular characterization. World Health Organization grades 2 and 3 were reported in 52.3% (79/151) and 47.7% (72/151) of cases, respectively. The frontal lobe was involved in the majority of cases (54.9%, 84/153). Gross total resection was achieved in 80.4% of cases (123/153). Tumor recurrence was identified in 27.7% of cases (39/141). Mean clinical follow-up was 41.3 months. Mean overall survival of patients who expired was 27.4 months whereas mean progression-free survival was 15.0 months. Comparatively, cortical ependymomas with C11orf95-RELA fusions and supratentorial ependymomas with C11orf95 RELA fusions exhibited differing clinical outcomes. Further studies with larger sample sizes are necessary to investigate the significance of RELA fusions on survival in cortical ependymomas and to determine whether cortical ependymomas with C11orf95-RELA fusions should be classified as a distinct entity.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

幕上皮质室管膜瘤:系统的文献回顾和病例说明。
皮质室管膜瘤目前不被认为是幕上室管膜瘤的一个亚组;然而,与幕上室管膜瘤相比,越来越多的文献研究了这些病变的自然历史。我们对皮质室管膜瘤进行了系统的文献回顾,重点是与幕上室管膜瘤相比,皮质室管膜瘤的自然史、临床特征和临床结果。我们的研究发现了153例独特的皮质室管膜瘤。平均发病年龄为21.2岁。男性占58.8%(90/153),女性占41.2%(63/153)。最常见的症状是发作活动,发生率为44.4%(68/153)。最近确认的C11orf95-RELA融合在13.7%的队列(21/153)中被确定,95.5%的病例(21/22)报告了分子特征。世界卫生组织2级和3级分别占52.3%(79/151)和47.7%(72/151)。大多数病例累及额叶(54.9%,84/153)。总切除率为80.4%(123/153)。肿瘤复发率为27.7%(39/141)。平均临床随访41.3个月。过期患者的平均总生存期为27.4个月,而平均无进展生存期为15.0个月。相比之下,C11orf95-RELA融合的皮质室管膜瘤和C11orf95-RELA融合的幕上室管膜瘤表现出不同的临床结果。为了进一步研究RELA融合对皮质室管膜瘤存活的意义,并确定是否应将具有C11orf95-RELA融合的皮质室管膜瘤作为一个独立的实体进行分类,还需要更大样本量的进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Rare Tumors
Rare Tumors ONCOLOGY-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信