[Dementia knowledge assessment for nurses and care workers: a psychometric description of measuring instruments as a guideline for Dutch practice].

Q4 Nursing
Anouk Spijker, Debby L Gerritsen, Anke Persoon
{"title":"[Dementia knowledge assessment for nurses and care workers: a psychometric description of measuring instruments as a guideline for Dutch practice].","authors":"Anouk Spijker,&nbsp;Debby L Gerritsen,&nbsp;Anke Persoon","doi":"10.36613/tgg.1875-6832/2022.03.02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A condition for good quality care for people with dementia is that nurses and carers have sufficient knowledge of dementia. To test this knowledge, to measure the effects of psychosocial interventions and to develop educational programs, knowledge tests for dementia have been developed. This review examined which knowledge tests are available for nurses and care workers. These are assessed by their method of development and their psychometric qualities. Eight measuring instruments were traced: KIDE, DKAT1, DKAT2, DKAS, ADKS, UJA Alzheimer's Care Scale, KASA and KDC-SAT. The DKAS had the best psychometric qualities: the instrument discriminates expectedly between groups with more versus less knowledge, education and experience with dementia, it is sensitive to change after education, it has a solid internal consistency and good reliability. It includes domains of the biomedical model as well as domains of the biopsychosocial model. The cross-cultural validity of the DKAS needs attention. For Dutch practice, the cross-cultural validity of the DKAS should be investigated in an applied study.</p>","PeriodicalId":39945,"journal":{"name":"Tijdschrift voor Gerontologie en Geriatrie","volume":"53 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tijdschrift voor Gerontologie en Geriatrie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36613/tgg.1875-6832/2022.03.02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A condition for good quality care for people with dementia is that nurses and carers have sufficient knowledge of dementia. To test this knowledge, to measure the effects of psychosocial interventions and to develop educational programs, knowledge tests for dementia have been developed. This review examined which knowledge tests are available for nurses and care workers. These are assessed by their method of development and their psychometric qualities. Eight measuring instruments were traced: KIDE, DKAT1, DKAT2, DKAS, ADKS, UJA Alzheimer's Care Scale, KASA and KDC-SAT. The DKAS had the best psychometric qualities: the instrument discriminates expectedly between groups with more versus less knowledge, education and experience with dementia, it is sensitive to change after education, it has a solid internal consistency and good reliability. It includes domains of the biomedical model as well as domains of the biopsychosocial model. The cross-cultural validity of the DKAS needs attention. For Dutch practice, the cross-cultural validity of the DKAS should be investigated in an applied study.

[护士和护工痴呆知识评估:荷兰实践指南测量工具的心理测量学描述]。
为痴呆症患者提供高质量护理的一个条件是护士和护理人员对痴呆症有足够的了解。为了检验这方面的知识,衡量心理社会干预措施的效果,并制定教育计划,已经制定了痴呆症知识测试。本综述审查了哪些知识测试可用于护士和护理工作者。这些是通过他们的发展方法和他们的心理测量质量来评估的。追踪8种测量仪器:KIDE、DKAT1、DKAT2、DKAS、ADKS、UJA阿尔茨海默病护理量表、KASA和KDC-SAT。DKAS具有最好的心理测量质量:该工具对痴呆症知识、教育程度和经验多与少的群体有预期的区分,对教育后的变化敏感,具有坚实的内部一致性和良好的信度。它包括生物医学模型领域以及生物心理社会模型领域。DKAS的跨文化有效性值得关注。在荷兰的实践中,DKAS的跨文化有效性需要进行应用研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信