A trans-scalar approach to peacebuilding and transitional justice: Insights from the Democratic Republic of Congo.

IF 1.9 2区 社会学 Q2 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS
Cooperation and Conflict Pub Date : 2022-12-01 Epub Date: 2021-12-29 DOI:10.1177/00108367211059448
Sara Hellmüller
{"title":"A trans-scalar approach to peacebuilding and transitional justice: Insights from the Democratic Republic of Congo.","authors":"Sara Hellmüller","doi":"10.1177/00108367211059448","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Peace research has taken a local turn. Yet, conceptual ambiguities, risks of romanticization, and critiques of co-option of the \"local\" point to the need to look for novel ways to think about the interactions of actors ranging from the global to the local level. Gearoid Millar proposes a trans-scalar approach to peace based on a \"consistency of purpose\" and a \"parity of esteem\" for actors across scales. This article analyzes the concept of trans-scalarity in the peace process in Ituri, a province in the northeastern Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC). Drawing on qualitative data from more than a year of research in the DRC, I argue that while a trans-scalar approach was taken to end violence, it was not applied to transitional justice initiatives. The result was a negative, rather than a positive peace. By showing the high, but still untapped, potential of trans-scalarity, the article makes three contributions. First, it advances the debate on the local turn by adding empirical insights on trans-scalarity and further developing the concept's theoretical foundations. Second, it provides novel empirical insights on the transitional justice process in the DRC. Third, it links scholarship on peacebuilding and transitional justice, which have often remained disconnected.</p>","PeriodicalId":47286,"journal":{"name":"Cooperation and Conflict","volume":"57 4","pages":"415-432"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9667079/pdf/","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cooperation and Conflict","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00108367211059448","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/12/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Peace research has taken a local turn. Yet, conceptual ambiguities, risks of romanticization, and critiques of co-option of the "local" point to the need to look for novel ways to think about the interactions of actors ranging from the global to the local level. Gearoid Millar proposes a trans-scalar approach to peace based on a "consistency of purpose" and a "parity of esteem" for actors across scales. This article analyzes the concept of trans-scalarity in the peace process in Ituri, a province in the northeastern Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC). Drawing on qualitative data from more than a year of research in the DRC, I argue that while a trans-scalar approach was taken to end violence, it was not applied to transitional justice initiatives. The result was a negative, rather than a positive peace. By showing the high, but still untapped, potential of trans-scalarity, the article makes three contributions. First, it advances the debate on the local turn by adding empirical insights on trans-scalarity and further developing the concept's theoretical foundations. Second, it provides novel empirical insights on the transitional justice process in the DRC. Third, it links scholarship on peacebuilding and transitional justice, which have often remained disconnected.

Abstract Image

建设和平和过渡时期司法的跨尺度方法:来自刚果民主共和国的见解。
和平研究已经转向当地。然而,概念上的模糊性、浪漫化的风险以及对“地方”选择的批评表明,需要寻找新的方式来思考从全球到地方层面的行动者之间的相互作用。米勒(Gearoid Millar)提出了一种基于“目的一致性”和跨尺度行动者“平等尊重”的跨尺度和平方法。本文分析了刚果民主共和国东北部伊图里省和平进程中的跨尺度概念。根据在刚果民主共和国一年多的研究所得的定性数据,我认为,虽然采取了跨尺度方法来结束暴力,但它并未适用于过渡时期司法倡议。结果是消极的,而不是积极的和平。通过展示高但尚未开发的跨尺度性潜力,本文做出了三个贡献。首先,它通过增加对跨尺度的实证见解和进一步发展这一概念的理论基础,推进了关于局部转向的辩论。其次,它为刚果民主共和国的过渡时期司法程序提供了新的实证见解。第三,它将建设和平和过渡时期司法方面的学术研究联系起来,而这两者往往是脱节的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
10.00%
发文量
32
期刊介绍: Published for over 40 years, the aim of Cooperation and Conflict is to promote research on and understanding of international relations. It believes in the deeds of academic pluralism and thus does not represent any specific methodology, approach, tradition or school. The mission of the journal is to meet the demands of the scholarly community having an interest in international studies (for details, see the statement "From the Editors" in Vol. 40, No. 3, September 2005). The editors especially encourage submissions contributing new knowledge of the field and welcome innovative, theory-aware and critical approaches. First preference will continue to be given to articles that have a Nordic and European focus. Cooperation and Conflict strictly adheres to a double-blind reviewing policy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信