Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on neuromuscular rehabilitation setting. Part 2: patients and families' views on the received health care during the pandemic.

Q3 Medicine
Acta Myologica Pub Date : 2022-06-30 eCollection Date: 2022-06-01 DOI:10.36185/2532-1900-075
Lorenza Magliano, Giulia Citarelli, Maria Grazia Esposito, Vito Torre, Luisa Politano
{"title":"Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on neuromuscular rehabilitation setting. Part 2: patients and families' views on the received health care during the pandemic.","authors":"Lorenza Magliano,&nbsp;Giulia Citarelli,&nbsp;Maria Grazia Esposito,&nbsp;Vito Torre,&nbsp;Luisa Politano","doi":"10.36185/2532-1900-075","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study explored views of users with muscular dystrophies and their caregivers on staff-user relationships and the treatments provided by a Rehabilitation Centre during the pandemic. Patients and relatives were asked to anonymously complete an open-ended questionnaire exploring their views on these aspects. Fifty-four patients and 40 caregivers gave their informed consent and participated in the survey. Fifty-three patients were adults, 28% suffering from Duchenne/Becker muscular dystrophy. Patients reported 269 comments on health care services provided during the pandemic, 132 (49%) concerning positive aspects and 137 (51%) negative aspects. The prompt restart of the rehabilitation therapies and the staff closeness over the pandemic were the practical aspects most frequently appreciated (46.9%), while closer family contacts and the perception of being able to rely on the Centre's constant support were the most cited psychological aspects (53.1%). Architectural barriers, difficulties in accessing public health services, economic difficulties, and lack of support from welfare and other agencies were the practical critical points most frequently reported (89%). In addition, social isolation, and loneliness due to fear of contagion were the most negative psychological aspects (10.1%). As regard the caregivers' views, participants reported 151 comments. Of these, 86 (56.9%) were positive and 65 (43.1%) were negative. Among the positive aspects, the psychological ones - such as closer family contacts, not feeling abandoned and counting on the constant Centre's professional support prevailed (53.5%). As for the negative aspects, most caregivers (92.6%) believe that the pandemic exacerbated their financial and bureaucratic difficulties, particularly in poorer families.</p>","PeriodicalId":35953,"journal":{"name":"Acta Myologica","volume":"41 2","pages":"89-94"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/dd/11/am-2022-02-89.PMC9237748.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Myologica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36185/2532-1900-075","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This study explored views of users with muscular dystrophies and their caregivers on staff-user relationships and the treatments provided by a Rehabilitation Centre during the pandemic. Patients and relatives were asked to anonymously complete an open-ended questionnaire exploring their views on these aspects. Fifty-four patients and 40 caregivers gave their informed consent and participated in the survey. Fifty-three patients were adults, 28% suffering from Duchenne/Becker muscular dystrophy. Patients reported 269 comments on health care services provided during the pandemic, 132 (49%) concerning positive aspects and 137 (51%) negative aspects. The prompt restart of the rehabilitation therapies and the staff closeness over the pandemic were the practical aspects most frequently appreciated (46.9%), while closer family contacts and the perception of being able to rely on the Centre's constant support were the most cited psychological aspects (53.1%). Architectural barriers, difficulties in accessing public health services, economic difficulties, and lack of support from welfare and other agencies were the practical critical points most frequently reported (89%). In addition, social isolation, and loneliness due to fear of contagion were the most negative psychological aspects (10.1%). As regard the caregivers' views, participants reported 151 comments. Of these, 86 (56.9%) were positive and 65 (43.1%) were negative. Among the positive aspects, the psychological ones - such as closer family contacts, not feeling abandoned and counting on the constant Centre's professional support prevailed (53.5%). As for the negative aspects, most caregivers (92.6%) believe that the pandemic exacerbated their financial and bureaucratic difficulties, particularly in poorer families.

COVID-19大流行对神经肌肉康复环境的影响第2部分:大流行期间患者和家属对获得的卫生保健的看法。
这项研究探讨了肌肉萎缩症患者及其护理人员对工作人员-使用者关系和康复中心在大流行期间提供的治疗的看法。患者和家属被要求匿名填写一份开放式问卷,探讨他们对这些方面的看法。54名患者和40名护理人员表示知情同意并参与了调查。成人53例,28%为Duchenne/Becker肌营养不良症。患者报告了269条关于大流行期间提供的卫生保健服务的评论,其中132条(49%)涉及积极方面,137条(51%)涉及消极方面。最常被赞赏的实际方面是迅速恢复康复治疗和工作人员在大流行病期间的亲密关系(46.9%),而最常被提到的心理方面是更密切的家庭联系和能够依靠中心的持续支持的感觉(53.1%)。建筑障碍、获得公共卫生服务的困难、经济困难以及缺乏福利和其他机构的支持是最常报告的实际关键点(89%)。此外,社会孤立和因害怕传染而感到孤独是最消极的心理方面(10.1%)。至于照顾者的观点,参与者报告了151条评论。其中阳性86例(56.9%),阴性65例(43.1%)。在积极方面中,心理方面- -例如更密切的家庭联系、不感到被抛弃和指望中心持续的专业支持- -占多数(53.5%)。至于消极方面,大多数照顾者(92.6%)认为,大流行加剧了他们的财务和官僚困难,特别是在较贫穷的家庭。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Myologica
Acta Myologica Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信