Acute and long-term success of left atrial anterior line and mitral isthmus line ablation in patients after mitral valve surgery.

IF 1.3
Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE Pub Date : 2022-09-01 Epub Date: 2022-08-16 DOI:10.1111/pace.14564
Jana Bertels, Laura Rottner, Christian-Hendrik Heeger, Tilman Maurer, Bruno Reissmann, Feifan Ouyang, Shibu Mathew, Peter Wohlmuth, Michael Schlüter, Karl-Heinz Kuck, Andreas Metzner, Christine Lemeš
{"title":"Acute and long-term success of left atrial anterior line and mitral isthmus line ablation in patients after mitral valve surgery.","authors":"Jana Bertels,&nbsp;Laura Rottner,&nbsp;Christian-Hendrik Heeger,&nbsp;Tilman Maurer,&nbsp;Bruno Reissmann,&nbsp;Feifan Ouyang,&nbsp;Shibu Mathew,&nbsp;Peter Wohlmuth,&nbsp;Michael Schlüter,&nbsp;Karl-Heinz Kuck,&nbsp;Andreas Metzner,&nbsp;Christine Lemeš","doi":"10.1111/pace.14564","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Perimitral flutter and atrial fibrillation may occur in patients with prior surgical mitral valve (MV) repair or replacement and can be challenging for percutaneous catheter ablation. This study sought to determine the feasibility, acute success and durability of catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation or atrial tachycardia by way of a mitral isthmus line (MIL) or an anterior line (AL).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 81 patients (49 males, mean age 62±11 years) with prior MV replacement (n = 30) or reconstruction (n = 51) underwent creation of a MIL (34) and/or an AL (72).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Acute bidirectional block of the MIL was successfully achieved in 24/34 cases and of the AL in 64/72 patients. Patients of the control group without prior MV surgery were matched 1:1 with the valve group. In the AL control subgroup, acute bidirectional block was achieved in 65/72 patients. Acute blockage in the MIL control subgroup could be achieved in 31/34 patients. The MIL valve subgroup showed the worst results in terms of durability, whereas a similar trend emerged in the control group and the AL valve subgroup (probability of failure in MIL valve subgroup 2.224 vs. MIL control subgroup 0.605 [Hazard Ratio (HR) = 0.27, 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.11-0.65), P = .004]; probability of failure in AL valve subgroup 0.844 vs. AL control subgroup 1.03 [HR = 1.22 (95% CI, 0.66-2.26), P = .523]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Percutaneous creation of MIL and AL is feasible and safe in patients with prior MV replacement/repair and associated with moderate acute and long-term success rates to achieve bidirectional block.</p>","PeriodicalId":520740,"journal":{"name":"Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE","volume":" ","pages":"1024-1031"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/pace.14564","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/8/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Perimitral flutter and atrial fibrillation may occur in patients with prior surgical mitral valve (MV) repair or replacement and can be challenging for percutaneous catheter ablation. This study sought to determine the feasibility, acute success and durability of catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation or atrial tachycardia by way of a mitral isthmus line (MIL) or an anterior line (AL).

Methods: A total of 81 patients (49 males, mean age 62±11 years) with prior MV replacement (n = 30) or reconstruction (n = 51) underwent creation of a MIL (34) and/or an AL (72).

Results: Acute bidirectional block of the MIL was successfully achieved in 24/34 cases and of the AL in 64/72 patients. Patients of the control group without prior MV surgery were matched 1:1 with the valve group. In the AL control subgroup, acute bidirectional block was achieved in 65/72 patients. Acute blockage in the MIL control subgroup could be achieved in 31/34 patients. The MIL valve subgroup showed the worst results in terms of durability, whereas a similar trend emerged in the control group and the AL valve subgroup (probability of failure in MIL valve subgroup 2.224 vs. MIL control subgroup 0.605 [Hazard Ratio (HR) = 0.27, 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.11-0.65), P = .004]; probability of failure in AL valve subgroup 0.844 vs. AL control subgroup 1.03 [HR = 1.22 (95% CI, 0.66-2.26), P = .523]).

Conclusions: Percutaneous creation of MIL and AL is feasible and safe in patients with prior MV replacement/repair and associated with moderate acute and long-term success rates to achieve bidirectional block.

二尖瓣手术后左心房前线和二尖瓣峡线消融的急性和长期成功。
背景:二尖瓣(MV)修复或置换术的患者可能发生二尖瓣周围扑动和心房颤动,这对经皮导管消融具有挑战性。本研究旨在确定经二尖瓣峡线(MIL)或前线(AL)导管消融房颤或房性心动过速的可行性、急性成功率和持久性。方法:共有81例(49名男性,平均年龄62±11岁)患者(n = 30)先前进行过中压置换术(n = 51)或重建术(n = 51),进行了MIL(34)和/或AL(72)的创建。结果:24/34例MIL和64/72例AL急性双向阻滞成功。未做过中压手术的对照组与瓣膜组1:1匹配。在AL控制亚组中,72例患者中有65例出现急性双向阻滞。MIL控制亚组有31/34的患者出现急性阻塞。MIL瓣膜亚组在耐久性方面表现出最差的结果,而对照组和AL瓣膜亚组也出现了类似的趋势(MIL瓣膜亚组的失败概率为2.224,MIL对照组为0.605[风险比(HR) = 0.27, 95%可信区间(CI), 0.11-0.65), P = 0.004];AL瓣亚组失败概率为0.844,AL对照组为1.03 [HR = 1.22 (95% CI, 0.66-2.26), P = .523]。结论:经皮制造MIL和AL对于先前进行过MV置换/修复的患者是可行和安全的,并且具有中等的急性和长期成功率来实现双向阻断。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信