Laparoscopic Appendectomy Translates into Less Analgesics and Faster Return to Work in Asia.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Anil Dinkar Rao, Chung Boon Daryl Tan, Reyaz Moiz Singaporewalla Md
{"title":"Laparoscopic Appendectomy Translates into Less Analgesics and Faster Return to Work in Asia.","authors":"Anil Dinkar Rao,&nbsp;Chung Boon Daryl Tan,&nbsp;Reyaz Moiz Singaporewalla Md","doi":"10.4293/JSLS.2022.00006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) is claimed to require less analgesic and allow for a faster return to work. This study examines whether these benefits hold true in Asian patient populations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective audit of emergency appendectomies over one year was conducted to study outcomes of postoperative pain, length of stay (LOS), duration of analgesia, and hospitalization leave (HL). A telephone questionnaire evaluated post-discharge analgesic intake, residual symptoms at follow-up, adequacy of HL and opinion on teleconsult reviews.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 201 patients, 187 (93%) underwent LA. Presurgery symptoms were significantly longer in the open appendectomy (OA) group (mean: OA 3.79, LA 1.81 days; <i>p </i>=<i> </i>0.026) which also had a higher frequency of perforation (71.4%). LA patients reported less pain compared to OA (LA 3.60 vs. OA 4.14; <i>p </i>=<i> </i>0.068) but were prescribed the same 2 weeks of analgesics as OA. LOS was significantly less for LA (mean LA 3.09, OA 6.93 days; <i>p </i>=<i> </i>0.006). Mean HL for LA and OA were 17.9 and 21.8 days respectively (<i>p </i>=<i> </i>0.05). Nearly 83% patients did not complete the prescribed course of analgesics and 47% patients felt that HL was more than adequate. Seventy-five percent of patients were asymptomatic at hospital follow-up and nearly 41% agreed to teleconsult reviews.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Majority of LA patients do not need 2 weeks of analgesics and their HL can be shortened for faster return to work thereby realizing the true benefits of minimally invasive surgery. Selected cases can be offered postoperative teleconsultation.</p>","PeriodicalId":17679,"journal":{"name":"JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/5d/fb/e2022.00006.PMC9215694.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2022.00006","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) is claimed to require less analgesic and allow for a faster return to work. This study examines whether these benefits hold true in Asian patient populations.

Methods: A retrospective audit of emergency appendectomies over one year was conducted to study outcomes of postoperative pain, length of stay (LOS), duration of analgesia, and hospitalization leave (HL). A telephone questionnaire evaluated post-discharge analgesic intake, residual symptoms at follow-up, adequacy of HL and opinion on teleconsult reviews.

Results: Of the 201 patients, 187 (93%) underwent LA. Presurgery symptoms were significantly longer in the open appendectomy (OA) group (mean: OA 3.79, LA 1.81 days; p =0.026) which also had a higher frequency of perforation (71.4%). LA patients reported less pain compared to OA (LA 3.60 vs. OA 4.14; p =0.068) but were prescribed the same 2 weeks of analgesics as OA. LOS was significantly less for LA (mean LA 3.09, OA 6.93 days; p =0.006). Mean HL for LA and OA were 17.9 and 21.8 days respectively (p =0.05). Nearly 83% patients did not complete the prescribed course of analgesics and 47% patients felt that HL was more than adequate. Seventy-five percent of patients were asymptomatic at hospital follow-up and nearly 41% agreed to teleconsult reviews.

Conclusion: Majority of LA patients do not need 2 weeks of analgesics and their HL can be shortened for faster return to work thereby realizing the true benefits of minimally invasive surgery. Selected cases can be offered postoperative teleconsultation.

Abstract Image

在亚洲,腹腔镜阑尾切除术可以减少镇痛剂,更快地恢复工作。
背景:腹腔镜阑尾切除术(LA)声称需要较少的止痛药,并允许更快地恢复工作。这项研究考察了这些益处是否适用于亚洲患者群体。方法:回顾性分析1年以上急诊阑尾切除术患者的术后疼痛、住院时间(LOS)、镇痛时间和住院天数(HL)。一份电话问卷评估出院后止痛药的摄入量、随访时的残留症状、HL的充分性和对远程会诊回顾的意见。结果:201例患者中,187例(93%)行LA。开腹阑尾切除术(OA)组术前症状明显延长(OA平均3.79天,LA平均1.81天;P = 0.026),穿孔发生率也较高(71.4%)。与OA相比,LA患者报告的疼痛更少(LA 3.60 vs OA 4.14;p = 0.068),但给予与OA相同的2周镇痛药。LA组的LOS显著小于LA组(平均LA 3.09, OA 6.93天;p = 0.006)。LA和OA的平均HL分别为17.9和21.8天(p = 0.05)。近83%的患者没有完成规定的镇痛疗程,47%的患者认为HL治疗绰绰有余。75%的患者在医院随访时无症状,近41%的患者同意进行远程咨询。结论:大多数LA患者不需要2周的镇痛药,其HL可以缩短,更快地恢复工作,从而实现微创手术的真正好处。选定病例可进行术后远程会诊。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
69
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: JSLS, Journal of the Society of Laparoscopic & Robotic Surgeons publishes original scientific articles on basic science and technical topics in all the fields involved with laparoscopic, robotic, and minimally invasive surgery. CRSLS, MIS Case Reports from SLS is dedicated to the publication of Case Reports in the field of minimally invasive surgery. The journals seek to advance our understandings and practice of minimally invasive, image-guided surgery by providing a forum for all relevant disciplines and by promoting the exchange of information and ideas across specialties.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信