Liposomal Bupivacaine Injection for Analgesia During Minimally Invasive Supracervical Hysterectomy.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Mary Ann Son, Shantel Jiggetts, Amro Elfeky, Camila De Amorim Paiva, Michael Silver, David Herzog, Sumit Saraf, Pedram Bral
{"title":"Liposomal Bupivacaine Injection for Analgesia During Minimally Invasive Supracervical Hysterectomy.","authors":"Mary Ann Son,&nbsp;Shantel Jiggetts,&nbsp;Amro Elfeky,&nbsp;Camila De Amorim Paiva,&nbsp;Michael Silver,&nbsp;David Herzog,&nbsp;Sumit Saraf,&nbsp;Pedram Bral","doi":"10.4293/JSLS.2022.00008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the efficacy of intracervical injection of liposomal bupivacaine for postoperative pain control among women undergoing minimally invasive supracervical hysterectomy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A randomized double-blinded placebo-controlled trial of intracervical injection of combination liposomal bupivacaine and bupivacaine for postoperative pain among patients undergoing laparoscopic and robotic supracervical hysterectomy. Patients were enrolled between October 1, 2018 and April 30, 2019. The primary outcome was pain at 12 hours postoperatively using a numeric rating scale from zero to 10. Pain scores were also recorded pre-operatively, immediately postoperatively, at 12, 24, and 48 hours postoperatively. The secondary outcome was the number of patients who required opioid analgesic medications up to 48 hours postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty participants were randomized into the control (n = 30) and intervention (n = 30) groups. Pain scores were 1 and 1.75 (p = 0.89) immediately postoperatively, 3 and 3.5 (p = 0.85) at 12 hours, 3.5 and 5 (p = 0.22) at 24 hours, and 2.75 and 4 (p = 0.18) at 48 hours for the control and intervention groups, respectively. Within the first 24 hours, 10 patients in the control and 14 patients in the intervention group used narcotics (p = 0.37). From the 24 to 48 hours window, 6 and 8 patients in the control and intervention groups used narcotics (p = 0.74), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There was no statistically significant difference in pain scores between patients receiving combination liposomal bupivacaine and bupivacaine intracervical block and those receiving placebo in the first 48 hours after surgery. There was no difference in analgesic use between the two study groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":17679,"journal":{"name":"JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/20/b7/e2022.00008.PMC9255262.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2022.00008","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of intracervical injection of liposomal bupivacaine for postoperative pain control among women undergoing minimally invasive supracervical hysterectomy.

Methods: A randomized double-blinded placebo-controlled trial of intracervical injection of combination liposomal bupivacaine and bupivacaine for postoperative pain among patients undergoing laparoscopic and robotic supracervical hysterectomy. Patients were enrolled between October 1, 2018 and April 30, 2019. The primary outcome was pain at 12 hours postoperatively using a numeric rating scale from zero to 10. Pain scores were also recorded pre-operatively, immediately postoperatively, at 12, 24, and 48 hours postoperatively. The secondary outcome was the number of patients who required opioid analgesic medications up to 48 hours postoperatively.

Results: Sixty participants were randomized into the control (n = 30) and intervention (n = 30) groups. Pain scores were 1 and 1.75 (p = 0.89) immediately postoperatively, 3 and 3.5 (p = 0.85) at 12 hours, 3.5 and 5 (p = 0.22) at 24 hours, and 2.75 and 4 (p = 0.18) at 48 hours for the control and intervention groups, respectively. Within the first 24 hours, 10 patients in the control and 14 patients in the intervention group used narcotics (p = 0.37). From the 24 to 48 hours window, 6 and 8 patients in the control and intervention groups used narcotics (p = 0.74), respectively.

Conclusion: There was no statistically significant difference in pain scores between patients receiving combination liposomal bupivacaine and bupivacaine intracervical block and those receiving placebo in the first 48 hours after surgery. There was no difference in analgesic use between the two study groups.

布比卡因脂质体注射在微创宫颈上子宫切除术中的镇痛作用。
目的:评价宫颈内注射布比卡因脂质体对微创宫颈上子宫切除术妇女术后疼痛的控制效果。方法:采用随机双盲安慰剂对照试验,对腹腔镜和机器人宫颈上子宫切除术患者进行宫颈内注射布比卡因联合脂质体和布比卡因治疗术后疼痛。患者在2018年10月1日至2019年4月30日期间入组。主要结果是术后12小时的疼痛,使用从0到10的数字评分量表。同时记录术前、术后即刻、术后12、24、48小时疼痛评分。次要结果是术后48小时内需要阿片类镇痛药物的患者数量。结果:60名受试者随机分为对照组(n = 30)和干预组(n = 30)。对照组和干预组术后即刻疼痛评分分别为1分和1.75分(p = 0.89), 12小时疼痛评分分别为3分和3.5分(p = 0.85), 24小时疼痛评分分别为3.5分和5分(p = 0.22), 48小时疼痛评分分别为2.75分和4分(p = 0.18)。治疗前24小时内,对照组10例,干预组14例使用麻醉品(p = 0.37)。在24 ~ 48小时内,对照组和干预组分别有6例和8例患者使用麻醉品(p = 0.74)。结论:术后48小时内,布比卡因联合脂质体和布比卡因颈内阻滞组与安慰剂组疼痛评分差异无统计学意义。两个研究组在镇痛药的使用上没有差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
69
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: JSLS, Journal of the Society of Laparoscopic & Robotic Surgeons publishes original scientific articles on basic science and technical topics in all the fields involved with laparoscopic, robotic, and minimally invasive surgery. CRSLS, MIS Case Reports from SLS is dedicated to the publication of Case Reports in the field of minimally invasive surgery. The journals seek to advance our understandings and practice of minimally invasive, image-guided surgery by providing a forum for all relevant disciplines and by promoting the exchange of information and ideas across specialties.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信