The impact of government- and institution-implemented COVID-19 control measures on tertiary- and regional-level intensive care units in Pietermaritzburg, KwaZulu-Natal Province, South Africa.

K Rangai, A Ramkillawan, M T D Smith
{"title":"The impact of government- and institution-implemented COVID-19 control measures on tertiary- and regional-level intensive care units in Pietermaritzburg, KwaZulu-Natal Province, South Africa.","authors":"K Rangai,&nbsp;A Ramkillawan,&nbsp;M T D Smith","doi":"10.7196/SAJCC.2022.v38i1.515","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic has had a significant impact on healthcare systems globally as most countries were not equipped to deal with the outbreak. To avoid complete collapse of intensive care units (ICUs) and health systems as a whole, containment measures had to be instituted. In South Africa (SA), the biggest intervention was the government-regulated national lockdown instituted in March 2020.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the effects of the implemented lockdown and institutional guidelines on the admission rate and profile of non-COVID-19 patients in a regional and tertiary level ICU in Pietermaritzburg, KwaZulu-Natal Province, SA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis of all non-COVID-19 admissions to Harry Gwala and Greys hospitals was performed over an 8-month period (1 December 2019 - 31 July 2020), which included 4 months prior to lockdown implementation and 4 months post lockdown.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were a total of 678 non-COVID-19 admissions over the 8-month period. The majority of the admissions were at Greys Hospital (52.4%; n=355) and the rest at Harry Gwala Hospital (47.6%; n=323). A change in spectrum of patients admitted was noted, with a significant decrease in trauma and burns admissions post lockdown implementation (from 34.2 - 24.6%; p=0.006). Conversely, there was a notable increase in non-COVID-19 medical admissions after lockdown regulations were implemented (20.1 - 31.3%; p<0.001). We hypothesised that this was due to the gap left by trauma patients in an already overburdened system.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite the implementation of a national lockdown and multiple institutional directives, there was no significant decrease in the total number of non-COVID-19 admissions to ICUs. There was, however, a notable change in spectrum of patients admitted, which may reflect a bias towards trauma admissions in the pre COVID-19 era.</p><p><strong>Contributions of the study: </strong>We describe the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on critical care services in a resource-limited setting. We also demonstrate the ongoing need for intensive care unit beds within the public sector.</p>","PeriodicalId":75194,"journal":{"name":"The Southern African journal of critical care : the official journal of the Critical Care Society","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/c8/ae/SAJCC-38-1-515.PMC9252134.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Southern African journal of critical care : the official journal of the Critical Care Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7196/SAJCC.2022.v38i1.515","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has had a significant impact on healthcare systems globally as most countries were not equipped to deal with the outbreak. To avoid complete collapse of intensive care units (ICUs) and health systems as a whole, containment measures had to be instituted. In South Africa (SA), the biggest intervention was the government-regulated national lockdown instituted in March 2020.

Objectives: To evaluate the effects of the implemented lockdown and institutional guidelines on the admission rate and profile of non-COVID-19 patients in a regional and tertiary level ICU in Pietermaritzburg, KwaZulu-Natal Province, SA.

Methods: A retrospective analysis of all non-COVID-19 admissions to Harry Gwala and Greys hospitals was performed over an 8-month period (1 December 2019 - 31 July 2020), which included 4 months prior to lockdown implementation and 4 months post lockdown.

Results: There were a total of 678 non-COVID-19 admissions over the 8-month period. The majority of the admissions were at Greys Hospital (52.4%; n=355) and the rest at Harry Gwala Hospital (47.6%; n=323). A change in spectrum of patients admitted was noted, with a significant decrease in trauma and burns admissions post lockdown implementation (from 34.2 - 24.6%; p=0.006). Conversely, there was a notable increase in non-COVID-19 medical admissions after lockdown regulations were implemented (20.1 - 31.3%; p<0.001). We hypothesised that this was due to the gap left by trauma patients in an already overburdened system.

Conclusion: Despite the implementation of a national lockdown and multiple institutional directives, there was no significant decrease in the total number of non-COVID-19 admissions to ICUs. There was, however, a notable change in spectrum of patients admitted, which may reflect a bias towards trauma admissions in the pre COVID-19 era.

Contributions of the study: We describe the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on critical care services in a resource-limited setting. We also demonstrate the ongoing need for intensive care unit beds within the public sector.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

政府和机构实施的COVID-19控制措施对南非夸祖鲁-纳塔尔省彼得马里茨堡三级和区域重症监护病房的影响。
背景:COVID-19大流行对全球卫生保健系统产生了重大影响,因为大多数国家没有应对疫情的能力。为了避免重症监护病房和整个卫生系统的彻底崩溃,必须制定遏制措施。在南非,最大的干预措施是2020年3月由政府监管的全国封锁。目的:评估实施的封锁和机构指南对南非夸祖鲁-纳塔尔省彼得马里茨堡地区和三级ICU非covid -19患者入院率和概况的影响。方法:回顾性分析Harry Gwala和Greys医院在8个月内(2019年12月1日至2020年7月31日)的所有非covid -19入院患者,其中包括封锁实施前的4个月和封锁后的4个月。结果:8个月期间共有678例非covid -19入院。大多数住院患者在格雷斯医院(52.4%);n=355),其余在Harry Gwala医院(47.6%;n = 323)。入院患者的频谱发生了变化,在实施封锁后,入院的创伤和烧伤患者显著减少(从34.2降至24.6%;p = 0.006)。相反,在实施封城规定后,非covid -19住院人数显著增加(20.1%至31.3%;结论:尽管实施了全国封锁和多项机构指令,但非covid -19重症监护病房入院总数未显着下降。然而,入院患者的范围发生了显着变化,这可能反映了在COVID-19前时代对创伤入院的偏见。研究贡献:我们描述了COVID-19大流行对资源有限环境下重症监护服务的影响。我们还展示了公共部门对重症监护病房床位的持续需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信