Validation of a dietary advice protocol for adults with obesity in primary health care according to the Brazilian Dietary Guidelines.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Lorrany S Rodrigues, Nathalia Pizato, Kenia M B Carvalho, Eliane S Dutra, Patrícia B Botelho, Laila S Andrade, Verena D Moraes, Vivian S S Gonçalves
{"title":"Validation of a dietary advice protocol for adults with obesity in primary health care according to the Brazilian Dietary Guidelines.","authors":"Lorrany S Rodrigues, Nathalia Pizato, Kenia M B Carvalho, Eliane S Dutra, Patrícia B Botelho, Laila S Andrade, Verena D Moraes, Vivian S S Gonçalves","doi":"10.1093/fampra/cmac132","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Obesity is a non-communicable chronic disease which carries a high cost for the Brazilian Unified Health System. Standardized protocols can help primary health care (PHC) professionals manage the disease.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To describe the validation process of a protocol concerning dietary guidelines for adults with obesity in PHC by non-nutrition professionals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A validation study of a dietary advice protocol consisting of 6 recommendations was conducted according to Brazilian Dietary Guidelines. The topics incorporated into the recommendations were submitted to a panel of judges for content validity and achieved a Scale Content Validity Index (S-CVI) score >0.80. Subsequently, an online workshop was held and consisted of guiding questions to adequately improve current protocols. Face validity was assessed in a mediation workshop conducted with PHC non-nutrition professionals. Following the validation process, necessary adjustments were made to the eating protocol.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The validation process was conducted by a panel of 20 judges and 10 PHC professionals. The content was validated using a 0.98 S-CVI. The online workshop expert panel agreed the instrument provides a trustworthy foundation for appropriate dietary guidelines. Moreover, the judges suggested changes to the flowchart designed to support the professionals' decisions, discussed the absence of quantitative prescription guidelines, and offered additional suggestions to strengthen equity and encourage autonomy in non-nutrition healthcare professionals in PHC.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study describes the validation process of a dietary advice protocol for people with obesity, as well as the importance of its integration into PHC.</p>","PeriodicalId":12209,"journal":{"name":"Family practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmac132","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Obesity is a non-communicable chronic disease which carries a high cost for the Brazilian Unified Health System. Standardized protocols can help primary health care (PHC) professionals manage the disease.

Objectives: To describe the validation process of a protocol concerning dietary guidelines for adults with obesity in PHC by non-nutrition professionals.

Methods: A validation study of a dietary advice protocol consisting of 6 recommendations was conducted according to Brazilian Dietary Guidelines. The topics incorporated into the recommendations were submitted to a panel of judges for content validity and achieved a Scale Content Validity Index (S-CVI) score >0.80. Subsequently, an online workshop was held and consisted of guiding questions to adequately improve current protocols. Face validity was assessed in a mediation workshop conducted with PHC non-nutrition professionals. Following the validation process, necessary adjustments were made to the eating protocol.

Results: The validation process was conducted by a panel of 20 judges and 10 PHC professionals. The content was validated using a 0.98 S-CVI. The online workshop expert panel agreed the instrument provides a trustworthy foundation for appropriate dietary guidelines. Moreover, the judges suggested changes to the flowchart designed to support the professionals' decisions, discussed the absence of quantitative prescription guidelines, and offered additional suggestions to strengthen equity and encourage autonomy in non-nutrition healthcare professionals in PHC.

Conclusion: This study describes the validation process of a dietary advice protocol for people with obesity, as well as the importance of its integration into PHC.

根据《巴西膳食指南》,验证针对基层医疗机构肥胖症成人的膳食建议方案。
背景肥胖症是一种非传染性慢性疾病,巴西统一卫生系统为此付出了高昂的代价。标准化方案可帮助初级卫生保健(PHC)专业人员管理该疾病:描述非营养专业人员在初级卫生保健中对成人肥胖症饮食指导方案的验证过程:根据《巴西膳食指南》,对包含 6 项建议的膳食建议方案进行了验证研究。纳入建议的主题已提交评审团进行内容效度验证,其量表内容效度指数(S-CVI)大于 0.80。随后,举办了一次在线研讨会,提出了一些指导性问题,以充分改进当前的规程。在与初级保健中心非营养专业人员共同举办的调解研讨会上,对表面效度进行了评估。验证过程结束后,对饮食方案进行了必要的调整:验证过程由 20 名评委和 10 名初级保健专业人员组成的小组进行。内容验证的 S-CVI 为 0.98。在线研讨会专家小组一致认为,该工具为适当的饮食指南提供了值得信赖的基础。此外,评委们还对旨在支持专业人员决策的流程图提出了修改建议,讨论了缺乏定量处方指南的问题,并提出了其他建议,以加强公平性并鼓励初级保健中的非营养保健专业人员的自主性:本研究介绍了肥胖症患者饮食建议方案的验证过程,以及将其纳入初级保健服务的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Family practice
Family practice 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
9.10%
发文量
144
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Family Practice is an international journal aimed at practitioners, teachers, and researchers in the fields of family medicine, general practice, and primary care in both developed and developing countries. Family Practice offers its readership an international view of the problems and preoccupations in the field, while providing a medium of instruction and exploration. The journal''s range and content covers such areas as health care delivery, epidemiology, public health, and clinical case studies. The journal aims to be interdisciplinary and contributions from other disciplines of medicine and social science are always welcomed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信