Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches for Dental Age Assessment in Sub Adult Portuguese Population: European Regression Formula and Demirjian Stages.

IF 1.4 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Cristiana Palmela Pereira, Carla Belo, Joana Sardinha, Rui Santos, Francisco Salvado, Roberto Cameriere
{"title":"Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches for Dental Age Assessment in Sub Adult Portuguese Population: European Regression Formula and Demirjian Stages.","authors":"Cristiana Palmela Pereira,&nbsp;Carla Belo,&nbsp;Joana Sardinha,&nbsp;Rui Santos,&nbsp;Francisco Salvado,&nbsp;Roberto Cameriere","doi":"10.15644/asc56/3/7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Over the last decade, the criminal justice system among the European countries deals with a new group of people, the undocumented people. In the criminal field, most of the suspected claimed to be under the minor legal age according to the type of crime. The government of each European country is committed to protecting the children and vulnerable people. There are serious safety concerns since adults falsely claim to be minors and legal systems oppose to such claims. In this study, we have used different age assessment methods and some of them without accuracy.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To meet the general considerations we developed a study using the current dental age assessment methods. Hence, for the Portuguese population, this study aims to validate the European regression formula between the ages of 6 and 15 years of age; to estimate the cut-off point for the age of 12 years, and to compare the quantitative approach of European regression formula with Demirjian's qualitative approach for age estimation.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>483 orthopantomograms were analysed using the European formula and Demirjian scoring stages. A new method, Model 2, was designed to better suit the Portuguese population.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The European formula: average age underestimation of 4.88 for the third quadrant and 4.04 months for the fourth quadrant; and a mean absolute error (MAE) of 10.93 and 10.68 months respectively. Demirjian method: average overestimation of 8.70 months, MAE of 12.85 months. In Model 2: MAE of 9.37 months for the third quadrant, and 9.28 months for the fourth quadrant. Both European formula and Demirjian method had an area under ROC curves results above 0.93. Discrepancy of sensitivity between methods for the specific cut-off point: 11.48. The results obtained in this study can be extrapolated to 87.33% of the Portuguese population.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The European regression formula can be applied for the Portuguese population, and seems to be more accurate than Demirjian's methodology in this population. Nevertheless, both European regression formula and Demirjian method present similarly suitable results in the classification of 12 years of age, although there is a noticeable discrepancy favouring the European regression formula. The European Formula when applied for criminal age assessment, independently of population, is mandatory to indicate to the judicial institutions, the sensitivity of the results.</p>","PeriodicalId":7154,"journal":{"name":"Acta Stomatologica Croatica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/29/0a/ASC_56(3)_288-298.PMC9635504.pdf","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Stomatologica Croatica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15644/asc56/3/7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Introduction: Over the last decade, the criminal justice system among the European countries deals with a new group of people, the undocumented people. In the criminal field, most of the suspected claimed to be under the minor legal age according to the type of crime. The government of each European country is committed to protecting the children and vulnerable people. There are serious safety concerns since adults falsely claim to be minors and legal systems oppose to such claims. In this study, we have used different age assessment methods and some of them without accuracy.

Objective: To meet the general considerations we developed a study using the current dental age assessment methods. Hence, for the Portuguese population, this study aims to validate the European regression formula between the ages of 6 and 15 years of age; to estimate the cut-off point for the age of 12 years, and to compare the quantitative approach of European regression formula with Demirjian's qualitative approach for age estimation.

Material and methods: 483 orthopantomograms were analysed using the European formula and Demirjian scoring stages. A new method, Model 2, was designed to better suit the Portuguese population.

Results: The European formula: average age underestimation of 4.88 for the third quadrant and 4.04 months for the fourth quadrant; and a mean absolute error (MAE) of 10.93 and 10.68 months respectively. Demirjian method: average overestimation of 8.70 months, MAE of 12.85 months. In Model 2: MAE of 9.37 months for the third quadrant, and 9.28 months for the fourth quadrant. Both European formula and Demirjian method had an area under ROC curves results above 0.93. Discrepancy of sensitivity between methods for the specific cut-off point: 11.48. The results obtained in this study can be extrapolated to 87.33% of the Portuguese population.

Conclusions: The European regression formula can be applied for the Portuguese population, and seems to be more accurate than Demirjian's methodology in this population. Nevertheless, both European regression formula and Demirjian method present similarly suitable results in the classification of 12 years of age, although there is a noticeable discrepancy favouring the European regression formula. The European Formula when applied for criminal age assessment, independently of population, is mandatory to indicate to the judicial institutions, the sensitivity of the results.

Abstract Image

葡萄牙亚成年人口牙龄评估的定量和定性方法:欧洲回归公式和Demirjian阶段。
导言:在过去的十年中,欧洲国家的刑事司法系统涉及一个新的人群,即无证人群。在刑事领域,根据犯罪类型,大多数犯罪嫌疑人都声称自己未满未成年人法定年龄。每个欧洲国家的政府都致力于保护儿童和弱势群体。由于成年人谎称自己是未成年人,而法律制度反对这种说法,因此存在严重的安全问题。在本研究中,我们使用了不同的年龄评估方法,其中一些方法的准确性不高。目的:为了满足一般的考虑,我们开展了一项研究,使用目前的牙龄评估方法。因此,对于葡萄牙人口,本研究旨在验证欧洲回归公式在6至15岁之间;估计12岁年龄的截止点,并比较欧洲回归公式的定量方法与Demirjian的定性方法对年龄的估计。材料和方法:采用欧洲公式和Demirjian评分法对483张骨层析成像进行分析。一种新的方法,模型2,是为了更好地适应葡萄牙人而设计的。结果:欧洲公式:第三象限平均年龄低估4.88个月,第四象限平均年龄低估4.04个月;平均绝对误差(MAE)分别为10.93和10.68个月。Demirjian法:平均高估8.70个月,MAE 12.85个月。在模型2中,第三象限MAE为9.37个月,第四象限MAE为9.28个月。欧洲公式和Demirjian方法的ROC曲线下面积均大于0.93。两种方法在特定截止点上的灵敏度差异为11.48。本研究获得的结果可以外推到87.33%的葡萄牙人口。结论:欧洲回归公式可以应用于葡萄牙人群,并且似乎比Demirjian的方法更准确。尽管如此,欧洲回归公式和Demirjian方法在12岁的分类中都显示出类似的合适结果,尽管存在明显的差异,有利于欧洲回归公式。欧洲公式在适用于刑事年龄评估时,与人口无关,必须向司法机构表明结果的敏感性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Stomatologica Croatica
Acta Stomatologica Croatica DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
28.60%
发文量
32
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Acta Stomatologica Croatica (ASCRO) is a leading scientific non-profit journal in the field of dental, oral and cranio-facial sciences during the past 44 years in Croatia. ASCRO publishes original scientific and clinical papers, preliminary communications, case reports, book reviews, letters to the editor and news. Review articles are published by invitation from the Editor-in-Chief by acclaimed professionals in distinct fields of dental medicine. All manuscripts are subjected to peer review process.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信