Teaching, coaching, or debriefing With Good Judgment: a roadmap for implementing "With Good Judgment" across the SimZones.

IF 2.8 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Mary K Fey, Christopher J Roussin, Jenny W Rudolph, Kate J Morse, Janice C Palaganas, Demian Szyld
{"title":"Teaching, coaching, or debriefing With Good Judgment: a roadmap for implementing \"With Good Judgment\" across the SimZones.","authors":"Mary K Fey, Christopher J Roussin, Jenny W Rudolph, Kate J Morse, Janice C Palaganas, Demian Szyld","doi":"10.1186/s41077-022-00235-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Simulation-based learning occurs in multiple contexts, and one teaching style cannot adequately cover the needs at each learning level. For example, reflective debriefing, often used following a complex simulation case, is not what is needed when learning new skills. When to use which facilitation style is a question that educators often overlook or struggle to determine. SimZones is a framework used to clarify the multiple contexts in simulation. This framework, combined with elements of Debriefing With Good Judgment, can help educators match the appropriate facilitation style with learner needs and learning context. We have distilled the core elements of the \"with good judgment\" approach to debriefing and applied them to the SimZones framework to guide educators with (1) what type of learning can be expected with each learning context, (2) what behaviors and activities can be expected of the learners in each learning context, (3) what instructional strategies are most effectively used at each stage, and (4) what are the implications for the teacher-learner relationship.</p>","PeriodicalId":72108,"journal":{"name":"Advances in simulation (London, England)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9701361/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in simulation (London, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41077-022-00235-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Simulation-based learning occurs in multiple contexts, and one teaching style cannot adequately cover the needs at each learning level. For example, reflective debriefing, often used following a complex simulation case, is not what is needed when learning new skills. When to use which facilitation style is a question that educators often overlook or struggle to determine. SimZones is a framework used to clarify the multiple contexts in simulation. This framework, combined with elements of Debriefing With Good Judgment, can help educators match the appropriate facilitation style with learner needs and learning context. We have distilled the core elements of the "with good judgment" approach to debriefing and applied them to the SimZones framework to guide educators with (1) what type of learning can be expected with each learning context, (2) what behaviors and activities can be expected of the learners in each learning context, (3) what instructional strategies are most effectively used at each stage, and (4) what are the implications for the teacher-learner relationship.

以良好的判断力进行教学、辅导或汇报:在各模拟区实施 "以良好的判断力 "的路线图。
模拟学习有多种情境,一种教学方式无法充分满足每个学习层次的需求。例如,在学习新技能时,通常会在复杂的模拟案例后使用反思性汇报。何时使用哪种引导方式是教育者经常忽略或难以确定的问题。SimZones 是一个用于明确模拟教学中多种情境的框架。这一框架与 "善于判断的汇报 "的要素相结合,可以帮助教育者根据学习者的需求和学习情境匹配适当的引导风格。我们提炼出了 "善于判断 "汇报方法的核心要素,并将其应用到模拟区框架中,以指导教育者:(1) 在每种学习情境中可以预期哪种类型的学习;(2) 在每种学习情境中可以预期学习者有哪些行为和活动;(3) 在每个阶段最有效的教学策略是什么;(4) 对教师与学习者关系的影响是什么。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信