Multimodal Assessment of Smoking cue Reactivity During a Smoking Cue Exposure Task.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Clinical EEG and Neuroscience Pub Date : 2024-05-01 Epub Date: 2022-11-25 DOI:10.1177/15500594221138273
A M Kroczek, B Schröder, D Rosenbaum, A Mühleck, J Diemer, A Mühlberger, A J Fallgatter, A Batra, A-C Ehlis
{"title":"Multimodal Assessment of Smoking cue Reactivity During a Smoking Cue Exposure Task.","authors":"A M Kroczek, B Schröder, D Rosenbaum, A Mühleck, J Diemer, A Mühlberger, A J Fallgatter, A Batra, A-C Ehlis","doi":"10.1177/15500594221138273","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Background.</i> Cue-reactivity as a characteristic symptom of substance use disorders (SUD) is highly context dependent. Paradigms with high context validity need to be established for the investigation of underlying neurobiological mechanisms. While craving can be assessed by self-report as one aspect of cue-reactivity (CR), the assessment of biological measures such as the autonomous response and EEG promises a holistic perspective including CR at an automatized level. In a multimodal approach, smoking cue exposure (CE) effects on heart rate variability (HRV), EEG frequency power, and craving as well as their interrelation were assessed. This pilot study focused on the validity of CR measurements in a naturalistic CE paradigm. <i>Methods.</i> EEG frequency power, HRV, and craving were assessed during resting state (RS) and smoking CE in smokers (n = 14) and nonsmoking controls (n = 10) to investigate the psychophysiological and subjective reactions to CE. <i>Results.</i> Increased beta power was found only in smokers during CE compared to the control condition. There was an inverse correlation of beta power and maximum craving. Likewise, HRV correlated negatively with maximum smoking urges in smokers immediately after the measurements, without differentiation between CE and control condition. <i>Conclusion.</i> The increased beta power in smokers during CE is discussed as increased inhibitory control related to reduced craving in smokers. Furthermore, increased craving during CE seems to be associated to decreased vagal activity. The multimodal measurements during the CE showed ecological validity to be fundamental for CE assessment in clinical populations to evaluate its predictive value.</p>","PeriodicalId":10682,"journal":{"name":"Clinical EEG and Neuroscience","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11020128/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical EEG and Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15500594221138273","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/11/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background. Cue-reactivity as a characteristic symptom of substance use disorders (SUD) is highly context dependent. Paradigms with high context validity need to be established for the investigation of underlying neurobiological mechanisms. While craving can be assessed by self-report as one aspect of cue-reactivity (CR), the assessment of biological measures such as the autonomous response and EEG promises a holistic perspective including CR at an automatized level. In a multimodal approach, smoking cue exposure (CE) effects on heart rate variability (HRV), EEG frequency power, and craving as well as their interrelation were assessed. This pilot study focused on the validity of CR measurements in a naturalistic CE paradigm. Methods. EEG frequency power, HRV, and craving were assessed during resting state (RS) and smoking CE in smokers (n = 14) and nonsmoking controls (n = 10) to investigate the psychophysiological and subjective reactions to CE. Results. Increased beta power was found only in smokers during CE compared to the control condition. There was an inverse correlation of beta power and maximum craving. Likewise, HRV correlated negatively with maximum smoking urges in smokers immediately after the measurements, without differentiation between CE and control condition. Conclusion. The increased beta power in smokers during CE is discussed as increased inhibitory control related to reduced craving in smokers. Furthermore, increased craving during CE seems to be associated to decreased vagal activity. The multimodal measurements during the CE showed ecological validity to be fundamental for CE assessment in clinical populations to evaluate its predictive value.

在吸烟线索暴露任务中对吸烟线索反应性进行多模式评估。
背景。线索反应是药物使用障碍(SUD)的一种特征性症状,高度依赖于情境。为研究潜在的神经生物学机制,需要建立具有高度情境有效性的范式。虽然渴求可以作为线索反应(CR)的一个方面通过自我报告进行评估,但对自主反应和脑电图等生物测量指标的评估则可以提供一个包括自动化水平 CR 的整体视角。本研究采用多模态方法,评估了吸烟线索暴露(CE)对心率变异性(HRV)、脑电图频率功率和渴求的影响及其相互关系。本试验研究的重点是在自然CE范式中进行CR测量的有效性。研究方法对吸烟者(n = 14)和非吸烟对照组(n = 10)在静息状态(RS)和吸烟时的脑电图频率功率、心率变异和渴求感进行评估,以调查心理生理学和主观反应。结果发现与对照组相比,只有吸烟者在吸烟时β功率增加。β功率与最大渴求度呈负相关。同样,测量结束后,吸烟者的心率变异与最大吸烟冲动呈负相关,且不区分CE和对照组。结论CE期间吸烟者β功率的增加被认为是抑制控制的增强,与吸烟者渴求的减少有关。此外,CE 期间烟瘾的增加似乎与迷走神经活动的减少有关。CE期间的多模态测量显示了生态有效性,这对于在临床人群中评估CE的预测价值至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical EEG and Neuroscience
Clinical EEG and Neuroscience 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
5.00%
发文量
66
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical EEG and Neuroscience conveys clinically relevant research and development in electroencephalography and neuroscience. Original articles on any aspect of clinical neurophysiology or related work in allied fields are invited for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信