Fear of Dementia and the Obligation to Provide Aggregate Research Results to Study Participants.

IF 2.3
Mackenzie Graham, Francesca Farina, Craig W Ritchie, Brian Lawlor, Lorina Naci
{"title":"Fear of Dementia and the Obligation to Provide Aggregate Research Results to Study Participants.","authors":"Mackenzie Graham,&nbsp;Francesca Farina,&nbsp;Craig W Ritchie,&nbsp;Brian Lawlor,&nbsp;Lorina Naci","doi":"10.1017/S0963180122000408","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A general obligation to make aggregate research results available to participants has been widely supported in the bioethics literature. However, dementia research presents several challenges to this perspective, particularly because of the fear associated with developing dementia. The authors argue that considerations of respect for persons, beneficence, and justice fail to justify an obligation to make aggregate research results available to participants in dementia research. Nevertheless, there are positive reasons in favor of making aggregate research results available; when the decision is made to do so, it is critical that a clear strategy for communicating results is developed, including what support will be provided to participants receiving aggregate research results.</p>","PeriodicalId":520577,"journal":{"name":"Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics : CQ : the international journal of healthcare ethics committees","volume":" ","pages":"498-505"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics : CQ : the international journal of healthcare ethics committees","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0963180122000408","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

A general obligation to make aggregate research results available to participants has been widely supported in the bioethics literature. However, dementia research presents several challenges to this perspective, particularly because of the fear associated with developing dementia. The authors argue that considerations of respect for persons, beneficence, and justice fail to justify an obligation to make aggregate research results available to participants in dementia research. Nevertheless, there are positive reasons in favor of making aggregate research results available; when the decision is made to do so, it is critical that a clear strategy for communicating results is developed, including what support will be provided to participants receiving aggregate research results.

对痴呆症的恐惧和向研究参与者提供综合研究结果的义务。
在生物伦理学文献中,向参与者提供总体研究结果的一般义务得到了广泛支持。然而,痴呆症研究对这一观点提出了一些挑战,特别是因为人们对痴呆症的恐惧。作者认为,考虑到对人、慈善和正义的尊重,并不能证明有义务向痴呆症研究的参与者提供总体研究结果是正当的。然而,有积极的理由支持提供总体研究结果;在作出这样的决定时,至关重要的是要制定一个明确的交流结果的战略,包括将向接受总体研究结果的参与者提供何种支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书