Socioeconomic inequality in public satisfaction with the healthcare system in China: a quantile regression analysis.

XinXin Peng, Jing Hua Zhang
{"title":"Socioeconomic inequality in public satisfaction with the healthcare system in China: a quantile regression analysis.","authors":"XinXin Peng,&nbsp;Jing Hua Zhang","doi":"10.1186/s13690-022-00925-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>As China pursues better social equality and improvement in public services (healthcare), public satisfaction has been considered as a key performance indicator. There is a great need to better understand the disparities and inequalities in the public satisfaction with its healthcare system.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Based on Chinese General Social Survey (CGSS) 2015 ( a set of nationally representative survey data, the most recent wave containing information about public satisfaction with the healthcare system), this study utilizes the quantile regression method to analyze how the public satisfaction at high or low quantile of the score distribution varies according to the socio-economic status and healthcare system performance indicators, especially in rural areas.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study found that, at the highest percentile, better Self-Reported-Health (SRH) is associated significantly with a lower satisfaction score (coefficient -4.10, P < 0.01). High socioeconomic status (especially \"above average\" group) has higher satisfaction scores at both mean (coefficient 3.74, P<0.01) and median (coefficient 3.83, P<0.01). This effect is also significant across the lower quantiles of the satisfaction levels. West and Middle region (the less developed regions) tended to be more satisfied, whereas those in Northeast reported a large negative effect (coefficient -7.07, P < 0.01) at the median. While rural residents generally reported higher levels of satisfaction, rural residents' preference regarding hospital beds and primary care access seems generally to be opposite to that of urban residents.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings suggest that the ongoing healthcare reform needs to integrate more preventive care to meet the healthy residents' expectation and demands. More attention should be guided to the vulnerable healthcare system in the Northeast region, which has a stagnant local economy. Outcome-based quality care is especially preferred in rural healthcare, in addition to improvement of utilization and access. In addition, the \"pro-rich\" inequality is an ongoing concern about the system.</p>","PeriodicalId":365748,"journal":{"name":"Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique","volume":" ","pages":"165"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9264578/pdf/","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13690-022-00925-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: As China pursues better social equality and improvement in public services (healthcare), public satisfaction has been considered as a key performance indicator. There is a great need to better understand the disparities and inequalities in the public satisfaction with its healthcare system.

Methods: Based on Chinese General Social Survey (CGSS) 2015 ( a set of nationally representative survey data, the most recent wave containing information about public satisfaction with the healthcare system), this study utilizes the quantile regression method to analyze how the public satisfaction at high or low quantile of the score distribution varies according to the socio-economic status and healthcare system performance indicators, especially in rural areas.

Results: This study found that, at the highest percentile, better Self-Reported-Health (SRH) is associated significantly with a lower satisfaction score (coefficient -4.10, P < 0.01). High socioeconomic status (especially "above average" group) has higher satisfaction scores at both mean (coefficient 3.74, P<0.01) and median (coefficient 3.83, P<0.01). This effect is also significant across the lower quantiles of the satisfaction levels. West and Middle region (the less developed regions) tended to be more satisfied, whereas those in Northeast reported a large negative effect (coefficient -7.07, P < 0.01) at the median. While rural residents generally reported higher levels of satisfaction, rural residents' preference regarding hospital beds and primary care access seems generally to be opposite to that of urban residents.

Conclusion: Our findings suggest that the ongoing healthcare reform needs to integrate more preventive care to meet the healthy residents' expectation and demands. More attention should be guided to the vulnerable healthcare system in the Northeast region, which has a stagnant local economy. Outcome-based quality care is especially preferred in rural healthcare, in addition to improvement of utilization and access. In addition, the "pro-rich" inequality is an ongoing concern about the system.

Abstract Image

社会经济不平等对中国公众医疗保健系统满意度的影响:分位数回归分析。
背景:随着中国追求更好的社会平等和公共服务(医疗保健)的改善,公众满意度已被视为关键绩效指标。很有必要更好地了解公众对医疗保健系统满意度的差异和不平等。方法:基于中国综合社会调查(CGSS) 2015(一组具有全国代表性的调查数据,包含公众对医疗卫生系统满意度的最新浪潮),采用分位数回归方法,分析公众满意度在得分分布的高低分位数上随社会经济状况和医疗卫生系统绩效指标的变化,特别是在农村地区。结果:本研究发现,在最高百分位,自我报告健康状况越好,满意度得分越低(系数为-4.10,P)。结论:我们的研究结果表明,正在进行的医疗改革需要整合更多的预防保健,以满足健康居民的期望和需求。应该更多地关注东北地区脆弱的医疗体系,该地区经济停滞不前。在农村医疗保健中,除了改善利用和获取之外,尤其优先考虑以结果为基础的优质护理。此外,“有利于富人”的不平等是对该制度的持续担忧。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信