From pleasure to punding: Distinct patterns of anhedonia and impulsivity linked to motivational disturbances in Parkinson disease.

IF 1.7 4区 心理学
Bonnie M Scott, Robert S Eisinger, Amtul-Noor Rana, Jared F Benge, Robin C Hilsabeck, Michael S Okun, Aysegul Gunduz, Dawn Bowers
{"title":"From pleasure to punding: Distinct patterns of anhedonia and impulsivity linked to motivational disturbances in Parkinson disease.","authors":"Bonnie M Scott, Robert S Eisinger, Amtul-Noor Rana, Jared F Benge, Robin C Hilsabeck, Michael S Okun, Aysegul Gunduz, Dawn Bowers","doi":"10.1080/23279095.2022.2146506","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Apathy and impulse control disorders (ICD) are common comorbid motivational syndromes in Parkinson disease (PD). This study aimed to determine if patients with these motivational disturbances exhibit different patterns of anhedonia and trait impulsivity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sixty-four non-demented patients with PD completed questionnaires assessing apathy and ICD symptoms, which were used to classify participants into one of the following groups: apathy only, ICD only, both, and neither. Participants also completed multidimensional measures of anhedonia and trait impulsivity, which were compared across groups defined by motivational status.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Individuals with both apathy and ICD had significantly greater symptoms of positive and negative urgency than all other groups and had significantly greater consummatory anhedonia and lack of premeditation and perseverance than those with ICD only and neither. Patients with apathy only also reported significantly greater anticipatory anhedonia than those with ICD only and the neither group. There were no significant between-group differences in sensation seeking.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Distinct patterns of impulsivity and anhedonia characterize unique behavioral phenotypes of motivational disturbances in PD and may reflect important differences in the underlying neurobiological mechanisms. Clinicians should be aware that motivational disturbances may be more severe in cases where apathy co-occurs with one or more ICD.HIGHLIGHTSHighlights are mandatory for all submissions except letters. They consist of a short collection of bullet points that convey the core findings of the article and should be submitted in a separate file in the online submission system. Please use \"Highlights\" in the file name and include 3-5 bullet points (maximum 85 characters, including spaces, per bullet point). See https://www.elsevier.com/highlights for examples.</p>","PeriodicalId":50741,"journal":{"name":"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2022.2146506","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Apathy and impulse control disorders (ICD) are common comorbid motivational syndromes in Parkinson disease (PD). This study aimed to determine if patients with these motivational disturbances exhibit different patterns of anhedonia and trait impulsivity.

Methods: Sixty-four non-demented patients with PD completed questionnaires assessing apathy and ICD symptoms, which were used to classify participants into one of the following groups: apathy only, ICD only, both, and neither. Participants also completed multidimensional measures of anhedonia and trait impulsivity, which were compared across groups defined by motivational status.

Results: Individuals with both apathy and ICD had significantly greater symptoms of positive and negative urgency than all other groups and had significantly greater consummatory anhedonia and lack of premeditation and perseverance than those with ICD only and neither. Patients with apathy only also reported significantly greater anticipatory anhedonia than those with ICD only and the neither group. There were no significant between-group differences in sensation seeking.

Conclusion: Distinct patterns of impulsivity and anhedonia characterize unique behavioral phenotypes of motivational disturbances in PD and may reflect important differences in the underlying neurobiological mechanisms. Clinicians should be aware that motivational disturbances may be more severe in cases where apathy co-occurs with one or more ICD.HIGHLIGHTSHighlights are mandatory for all submissions except letters. They consist of a short collection of bullet points that convey the core findings of the article and should be submitted in a separate file in the online submission system. Please use "Highlights" in the file name and include 3-5 bullet points (maximum 85 characters, including spaces, per bullet point). See https://www.elsevier.com/highlights for examples.

从愉悦到焦虑:帕金森病患者失乐症和冲动的不同模式与动机障碍有关。
简介:淡漠和冲动控制障碍(ICD)是帕金森病(PD)中常见的合并动机综合征。本研究旨在确定这些动机障碍患者是否表现出不同的失神和特质冲动模式:64名非痴呆帕金森病患者填写了评估冷漠和ICD症状的问卷,并根据问卷将患者分为以下几组:仅冷漠组、仅ICD组、两者均有组和两者均无组。参与者还完成了失乐症和特质冲动性的多维度测量,并根据动机状态对不同组别进行了比较:结果:与所有其他组别相比,同时患有冷漠症和 ICD 的患者的积极和消极紧迫感症状明显更强,与仅患有 ICD 和两者均不患有 ICD 的患者相比,他们的消耗性失乐症以及缺乏预谋和毅力的症状明显更强。仅患冷漠症的患者的预期性失乐症也明显高于仅患 ICD 和两组患者。在寻求感觉方面,组间差异不明显:结论:冲动和失神的不同模式是帕金森病动机障碍的独特行为表型,可能反映了潜在神经生物学机制的重要差异。临床医生应该意识到,在冷漠与一种或多种 ICD 并存的病例中,动机障碍可能更为严重。摘要由简短的要点组成,传达文章的核心结论,并应在在线投稿系统中以单独文件的形式提交。请在文件名中使用 "Highlights",并包含 3-5 个要点(每个要点最多 85 个字符,包括空格)。有关示例,请参见 https://www.elsevier.com/highlights。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied Neuropsychology-Adult
Applied Neuropsychology-Adult CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-PSYCHOLOGY
自引率
11.80%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信