Verification of a 6-part differential haematology analyser Siemens Advia 2120i.

IF 3.8 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY
Helena Čičak, Vanja Radišić Biljak, Ana-Maria Šimundić
{"title":"Verification of a 6-part differential haematology analyser Siemens Advia 2120i.","authors":"Helena Čičak,&nbsp;Vanja Radišić Biljak,&nbsp;Ana-Maria Šimundić","doi":"10.11613/BM.2022.020710","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The aim of this study was to perform a comprehensive verification of a 6-part differential haematology analyser Siemens Advia 2120i (Erlangen, Germany), prior to its routine implementation.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Our verification protocol included: precision (within- and between-run), estimated bias (%) as measure of trueness, which was calculated from observed and manufacturers' declared value, analytical measuring interval (AMI), carryover, confirmation of a limit of blank (LoB), determination of a limit of detection (LoD) and limit of quantitation (LoQ). The K<sub>2</sub> ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) patients' leftover samples were used for verification of analyser Advia 2021i. Acceptance criteria were based on manufacturer technical specifications (Siemens), 2016 state-of-the-art criteria (Vis and Huisman), and EFLM Biological Variation Database.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The within- and between-run precision were acceptable for all parameters and the lowest coefficients of variation were observed for mean corpuscular volume (MCV) (0.3% and 0.6%, respectively). Estimated bias was within the acceptance criteria for all parameters except for MCV (the estimated bias was 2.2% (acceptance criteria 2.0%). AMI was confirmed for all tested parameters (r > 0.99). The carryover estimates ranged from 0.1% for platelet count (Plt) to 0.6% for red blood cell count and were within the manufacturers' specifications (≤ 1%). Manufacturers' claims for LoB were confirmed for leukocytes, erythrocytes, haemoglobin, and platelets. The estimated LoD and LoQ were 0.05 x10<sup>9</sup>/L and 0.1 x10<sup>9</sup>/L for white blood cell count, while for Plt values were 2 x10<sup>9</sup>/L and 3 x10<sup>9</sup>/L, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Analytical performance of the Siemens Advia 2120i meets predefined quality goals and is suitable for routine use in a clinical laboratory.</p>","PeriodicalId":9021,"journal":{"name":"Biochemia Medica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9195601/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biochemia Medica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11613/BM.2022.020710","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The aim of this study was to perform a comprehensive verification of a 6-part differential haematology analyser Siemens Advia 2120i (Erlangen, Germany), prior to its routine implementation.

Materials and methods: Our verification protocol included: precision (within- and between-run), estimated bias (%) as measure of trueness, which was calculated from observed and manufacturers' declared value, analytical measuring interval (AMI), carryover, confirmation of a limit of blank (LoB), determination of a limit of detection (LoD) and limit of quantitation (LoQ). The K2 ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) patients' leftover samples were used for verification of analyser Advia 2021i. Acceptance criteria were based on manufacturer technical specifications (Siemens), 2016 state-of-the-art criteria (Vis and Huisman), and EFLM Biological Variation Database.

Results: The within- and between-run precision were acceptable for all parameters and the lowest coefficients of variation were observed for mean corpuscular volume (MCV) (0.3% and 0.6%, respectively). Estimated bias was within the acceptance criteria for all parameters except for MCV (the estimated bias was 2.2% (acceptance criteria 2.0%). AMI was confirmed for all tested parameters (r > 0.99). The carryover estimates ranged from 0.1% for platelet count (Plt) to 0.6% for red blood cell count and were within the manufacturers' specifications (≤ 1%). Manufacturers' claims for LoB were confirmed for leukocytes, erythrocytes, haemoglobin, and platelets. The estimated LoD and LoQ were 0.05 x109/L and 0.1 x109/L for white blood cell count, while for Plt values were 2 x109/L and 3 x109/L, respectively.

Conclusions: Analytical performance of the Siemens Advia 2120i meets predefined quality goals and is suitable for routine use in a clinical laboratory.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

6部分差分血液学分析仪西门子Advia 2120i的验证。
简介:本研究的目的是对西门子Advia 2120i (Erlangen, Germany)的6组分差分血液学分析仪进行常规使用前的全面验证。材料和方法:我们的验证方案包括:精密度(运行内和运行间),估计偏差(%)作为准确性的度量,根据观察值和制造商声明的值计算,分析测量间隔(AMI),结转,空白限度(LoB)的确认,检测限(LoD)和定量限(LoQ)的确定。K2乙二胺四乙酸(EDTA)患者的剩余样品用于Advia 2021i分析仪的验证。验收标准基于制造商技术规范(西门子)、2016年最新标准(维斯和豪氏威马)和EFLM生物变异数据库。结果:所有参数的运行内和运行间精度均可接受,平均红细胞体积(MCV)的变异系数最低(分别为0.3%和0.6%)。除MCV外,所有参数的估计偏倚均在可接受标准内(估计偏倚为2.2%(可接受标准为2.0%)。所有测试参数均证实AMI (r > 0.99)。结转估计范围从血小板计数(Plt)的0.1%到红细胞计数的0.6%,并且在制造商的规格范围内(≤1%)。制造商声称的LoB已被证实适用于白细胞、红细胞、血红蛋白和血小板。白细胞计数的LoD和LoQ分别为0.05 x109/L和0.1 x109/L,而Plt值分别为2 x109/L和3 x109/L。结论:西门子Advia 2120i的分析性能满足预先设定的质量目标,适合临床实验室的常规使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biochemia Medica
Biochemia Medica 医学-医学实验技术
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
3.00%
发文量
70
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Biochemia Medica is the official peer-reviewed journal of the Croatian Society of Medical Biochemistry and Laboratory Medicine. Journal provides a wide coverage of research in all aspects of clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine. Following categories fit into the scope of the Journal: general clinical chemistry, haematology and haemostasis, molecular diagnostics and endocrinology. Development, validation and verification of analytical techniques and methods applicable to clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine are welcome as well as studies dealing with laboratory organization, automation and quality control. Journal publishes on a regular basis educative preanalytical case reports (Preanalytical mysteries), articles dealing with applied biostatistics (Lessons in biostatistics) and research integrity (Research integrity corner).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信