Commercially Available Molecular Approaches to Evaluate Endometrial Receptivity: A Systematic Review and Critical Analysis of the Literature.

IF 3.3
Evangelos Maziotis, Theodoros Kalampokas, Polina Giannelou, Sokratis Grigoriadis, Anna Rapani, Marios Anifantakis, Amalia Kotsifaki, Agni Pantou, Olga Triantafyllidou, Despoina Tzanakaki, Spyridoula Neofytou, Paraskevi Vogiatzi, Panagiotis Bakas, Mara Simopoulou, Nikolaos Vlahos
{"title":"Commercially Available Molecular Approaches to Evaluate Endometrial Receptivity: A Systematic Review and Critical Analysis of the Literature.","authors":"Evangelos Maziotis,&nbsp;Theodoros Kalampokas,&nbsp;Polina Giannelou,&nbsp;Sokratis Grigoriadis,&nbsp;Anna Rapani,&nbsp;Marios Anifantakis,&nbsp;Amalia Kotsifaki,&nbsp;Agni Pantou,&nbsp;Olga Triantafyllidou,&nbsp;Despoina Tzanakaki,&nbsp;Spyridoula Neofytou,&nbsp;Paraskevi Vogiatzi,&nbsp;Panagiotis Bakas,&nbsp;Mara Simopoulou,&nbsp;Nikolaos Vlahos","doi":"10.3390/diagnostics12112611","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite the advances in the field of reproductive medicine, implantation failure represents a challenging condition affecting 10-30% of patients subjected to in vitro fertilization (IVF). Research has focused on the identification of molecules playing crucial roles in endometrial receptivity, with the aim of designing predictive tools for efficient detection of the implantation window. To that end, novel molecular genomic and transcriptomic approaches have been introduced as promising tools to enable personalized approaches with the aim of optimizing embryo transfer dating. However, the clinical value of these approaches remains unclear. The aim of this study is to provide a systematic review and critical analysis of the existing evidence regarding the employment of commercially available novel approaches to evaluate endometrial receptivity. An Embase and PubMed/Medline search was performed on 1 February 2022. From the 475 articles yielded, only 27 were included and analyzed. The considerable heterogeneity of the included articles indicates the uniqueness of the implantation window, showcasing that the optimal time for embryo transfer varies significantly between women. Moreover, this study provides information regarding the technical aspects of these advanced molecular tools, as well as an analysis of novel possible biomarkers for endometrial receptivity, providing a basis for future research in the field.</p>","PeriodicalId":520604,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9689742/pdf/","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12112611","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Despite the advances in the field of reproductive medicine, implantation failure represents a challenging condition affecting 10-30% of patients subjected to in vitro fertilization (IVF). Research has focused on the identification of molecules playing crucial roles in endometrial receptivity, with the aim of designing predictive tools for efficient detection of the implantation window. To that end, novel molecular genomic and transcriptomic approaches have been introduced as promising tools to enable personalized approaches with the aim of optimizing embryo transfer dating. However, the clinical value of these approaches remains unclear. The aim of this study is to provide a systematic review and critical analysis of the existing evidence regarding the employment of commercially available novel approaches to evaluate endometrial receptivity. An Embase and PubMed/Medline search was performed on 1 February 2022. From the 475 articles yielded, only 27 were included and analyzed. The considerable heterogeneity of the included articles indicates the uniqueness of the implantation window, showcasing that the optimal time for embryo transfer varies significantly between women. Moreover, this study provides information regarding the technical aspects of these advanced molecular tools, as well as an analysis of novel possible biomarkers for endometrial receptivity, providing a basis for future research in the field.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

商业上可用的分子方法来评估子宫内膜容受性:对文献的系统回顾和批判性分析。
尽管生殖医学领域取得了进步,但植入失败是一个具有挑战性的问题,影响了10-30%的体外受精(IVF)患者。研究的重点是识别在子宫内膜容受性中起关键作用的分子,目的是设计预测工具来有效地检测植入窗口。为此,新的分子基因组学和转录组学方法作为有前途的工具被引入,以实现个性化的方法,目的是优化胚胎移植日期。然而,这些方法的临床价值尚不清楚。本研究的目的是对现有证据进行系统的回顾和批判性的分析,这些证据与使用商业上可用的新方法来评估子宫内膜容受性有关。Embase和PubMed/Medline检索于2022年2月1日进行。在得到的475篇文章中,只有27篇被纳入和分析。纳入文章的相当大的异质性表明着床窗口的独特性,表明胚胎移植的最佳时间在女性之间存在显着差异。此外,本研究提供了有关这些先进分子工具的技术方面的信息,以及对子宫内膜容受性的新的可能的生物标志物的分析,为该领域的未来研究提供了基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信