Machine Learning Highlights Downtrending of COVID-19 Patients with a Distinct Laboratory Profile.

Health data science Pub Date : 2021-06-16 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI:10.34133/2021/7574903
He S Yang, Yu Hou, Hao Zhang, Amy Chadburn, Lars F Westblade, Richard Fedeli, Peter A D Steel, Sabrina E Racine-Brzostek, Priya Velu, Jorge L Sepulveda, Michael J Satlin, Melissa M Cushing, Rainu Kaushal, Zhen Zhao, Fei Wang
{"title":"Machine Learning Highlights Downtrending of COVID-19 Patients with a Distinct Laboratory Profile.","authors":"He S Yang,&nbsp;Yu Hou,&nbsp;Hao Zhang,&nbsp;Amy Chadburn,&nbsp;Lars F Westblade,&nbsp;Richard Fedeli,&nbsp;Peter A D Steel,&nbsp;Sabrina E Racine-Brzostek,&nbsp;Priya Velu,&nbsp;Jorge L Sepulveda,&nbsp;Michael J Satlin,&nbsp;Melissa M Cushing,&nbsp;Rainu Kaushal,&nbsp;Zhen Zhao,&nbsp;Fei Wang","doi":"10.34133/2021/7574903","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>New York City (NYC) experienced an initial surge and gradual decline in the number of SARS-CoV-2-confirmed cases in 2020. A change in the pattern of laboratory test results in COVID-19 patients over this time has not been reported or correlated with patient outcome.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective study of routine laboratory and SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR test results from 5,785 patients evaluated in a NYC hospital emergency department from March to June employing machine learning analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A COVID-19 high-risk laboratory test result profile (COVID19-HRP), consisting of 21 routine blood tests, was identified to characterize the SARS-CoV-2 patients. Approximately half of the SARS-CoV-2 positive patients had the distinct COVID19-HRP that separated them from SARS-CoV-2 negative patients. SARS-CoV-2 patients with the COVID19-HRP had higher SARS-CoV-2 viral loads, determined by cycle threshold values from the RT-PCR, and poorer clinical outcome compared to other positive patients without the COVID12-HRP. Furthermore, the percentage of SARS-CoV-2 patients with the COVID19-HRP has significantly decreased from March/April to May/June. Notably, viral load in the SARS-CoV-2 patients declined, and their laboratory profile became less distinguishable from SARS-CoV-2 negative patients in the later phase.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our longitudinal analysis illustrates the temporal change of laboratory test result profile in SARS-CoV-2 patients and the COVID-19 evolvement in a US epicenter. This analysis could become an important tool in COVID-19 population disease severity tracking and prediction. In addition, this analysis may play an important role in prioritizing high-risk patients, assisting in patient triaging and optimizing the usage of resources.</p>","PeriodicalId":73207,"journal":{"name":"Health data science","volume":"2021 ","pages":"7574903"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9629663/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health data science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34133/2021/7574903","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: New York City (NYC) experienced an initial surge and gradual decline in the number of SARS-CoV-2-confirmed cases in 2020. A change in the pattern of laboratory test results in COVID-19 patients over this time has not been reported or correlated with patient outcome.

Methods: We performed a retrospective study of routine laboratory and SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR test results from 5,785 patients evaluated in a NYC hospital emergency department from March to June employing machine learning analysis.

Results: A COVID-19 high-risk laboratory test result profile (COVID19-HRP), consisting of 21 routine blood tests, was identified to characterize the SARS-CoV-2 patients. Approximately half of the SARS-CoV-2 positive patients had the distinct COVID19-HRP that separated them from SARS-CoV-2 negative patients. SARS-CoV-2 patients with the COVID19-HRP had higher SARS-CoV-2 viral loads, determined by cycle threshold values from the RT-PCR, and poorer clinical outcome compared to other positive patients without the COVID12-HRP. Furthermore, the percentage of SARS-CoV-2 patients with the COVID19-HRP has significantly decreased from March/April to May/June. Notably, viral load in the SARS-CoV-2 patients declined, and their laboratory profile became less distinguishable from SARS-CoV-2 negative patients in the later phase.

Conclusions: Our longitudinal analysis illustrates the temporal change of laboratory test result profile in SARS-CoV-2 patients and the COVID-19 evolvement in a US epicenter. This analysis could become an important tool in COVID-19 population disease severity tracking and prediction. In addition, this analysis may play an important role in prioritizing high-risk patients, assisting in patient triaging and optimizing the usage of resources.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

机器学习突出了具有独特实验室特征的COVID-19患者的下降趋势。
背景:纽约市在2020年经历了sars - cov -2确诊病例数量的最初激增和逐渐下降。在此期间,没有报告COVID-19患者实验室检测结果模式的变化,也没有与患者预后相关。方法:我们对3月至6月在纽约市一家医院急诊科评估的5,785例患者的常规实验室和SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR检测结果进行了回顾性研究,采用机器学习分析。结果:由21项常规血液检查组成的COVID-19高危实验室检测结果(COVID-19 - hrp)可确定SARS-CoV-2患者的特征。大约一半的SARS-CoV-2阳性患者具有独特的covid - 19- hrp,将他们与SARS-CoV-2阴性患者区分开来。通过RT-PCR的周期阈值确定,具有covid - 19- hrp的SARS-CoV-2患者具有更高的SARS-CoV-2病毒载量,并且与其他未具有covid - 12- hrp的阳性患者相比,临床结果较差。此外,从3月/ 4月到5月/ 6月,SARS-CoV-2患者与covid - 19- hrp的比例显著下降。值得注意的是,SARS-CoV-2患者的病毒载量下降,并且在后期,他们的实验室特征与SARS-CoV-2阴性患者变得难以区分。结论:我们的纵向分析说明了SARS-CoV-2患者实验室检测结果概况的时间变化以及美国中心地区COVID-19的演变。该分析可成为COVID-19人群疾病严重程度跟踪和预测的重要工具。此外,该分析可能在高危患者的优先排序,协助患者分诊和优化资源利用方面发挥重要作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信