Comparison of full-face and oronasal mask effectiveness in hypercapnic respiratory failure patients with non-invasive mechanical ventilation.

IF 0.7 Q4 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Birsen Cirit Ekiz, Nurhan Köksal, Tibel Tuna, Yusuf Taha Güllü
{"title":"Comparison of full-face and oronasal mask effectiveness in hypercapnic respiratory failure patients with non-invasive mechanical ventilation.","authors":"Birsen Cirit Ekiz,&nbsp;Nurhan Köksal,&nbsp;Tibel Tuna,&nbsp;Yusuf Taha Güllü","doi":"10.5578/tt.20229806","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Non-invasive mechanical ventilation (NIMV) is a successful treatment modality in hypercapnic respiratory failure. Patient compliance and mask selection are the most important factors in the success of NIMV. In our prospective randomized study, we aimed to investigate the efficacy of full-face and oronasal masks in the treatment of patients with hypercapnic respiratory failure who underwent NIMV and to investigate the mask compliance of the patients.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In this prospective randomized study, 60 patients with hypercapnic respiratory failure were divided into two groups; the full face mask group (n= 30) and the oronasal mask group (n= 30). Arterial blood gas values and respiratory rates were measured before the treatment and at the 1st, 6th, 24th, and 72nd hours of the treatment. The compliance of the patients with the treatment was evaluated with the patient compliance scale (PCS) at the 1st, 6th, and 24th hours of the treatment.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>Eight patients from the full-face mask group were excluded because of mask-face mismatch and claustrophobia, and two patients from the oronasal mask group due to persistent hypercapnia. In the full face mask group, improvement in pH was observed at the 1st and 24th hours of treatment (p= 0.042, p= 0.033), and PCO2 decreased at the 72nd hour of treatment (p= 0.024). There was no difference in patient compliance and respiratory rate between groups. The complaints of burning sensation and pressure in the eyes were higher in the full face mask group (p= 0.025), and pressure ulcers were more common in the oronasal mask group (p= 0.025).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The reduction in PCO2 and improvement in pH were greater with a full face mask. Pressure sores were less common with a full face mask. In our study, no difference was found in terms of patient compliance between groups. It should be noted that choosing a full face mask in patients with high compliance will increase the success in the treatment of hypercapnic respiratory failure.</p>","PeriodicalId":45521,"journal":{"name":"Tuberkuloz ve Toraks-Tuberculosis and Thorax","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tuberkuloz ve Toraks-Tuberculosis and Thorax","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5578/tt.20229806","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction: Non-invasive mechanical ventilation (NIMV) is a successful treatment modality in hypercapnic respiratory failure. Patient compliance and mask selection are the most important factors in the success of NIMV. In our prospective randomized study, we aimed to investigate the efficacy of full-face and oronasal masks in the treatment of patients with hypercapnic respiratory failure who underwent NIMV and to investigate the mask compliance of the patients.

Materials and methods: In this prospective randomized study, 60 patients with hypercapnic respiratory failure were divided into two groups; the full face mask group (n= 30) and the oronasal mask group (n= 30). Arterial blood gas values and respiratory rates were measured before the treatment and at the 1st, 6th, 24th, and 72nd hours of the treatment. The compliance of the patients with the treatment was evaluated with the patient compliance scale (PCS) at the 1st, 6th, and 24th hours of the treatment.

Result: Eight patients from the full-face mask group were excluded because of mask-face mismatch and claustrophobia, and two patients from the oronasal mask group due to persistent hypercapnia. In the full face mask group, improvement in pH was observed at the 1st and 24th hours of treatment (p= 0.042, p= 0.033), and PCO2 decreased at the 72nd hour of treatment (p= 0.024). There was no difference in patient compliance and respiratory rate between groups. The complaints of burning sensation and pressure in the eyes were higher in the full face mask group (p= 0.025), and pressure ulcers were more common in the oronasal mask group (p= 0.025).

Conclusions: The reduction in PCO2 and improvement in pH were greater with a full face mask. Pressure sores were less common with a full face mask. In our study, no difference was found in terms of patient compliance between groups. It should be noted that choosing a full face mask in patients with high compliance will increase the success in the treatment of hypercapnic respiratory failure.

无创机械通气治疗高碳酸血症性呼吸衰竭患者全脸面罩与口鼻面罩疗效比较。
无创机械通气(NIMV)是治疗高碳酸血症性呼吸衰竭的一种成功方法。患者依从性和口罩选择是NIMV成功的最重要因素。在我们的前瞻性随机研究中,我们旨在探讨全脸和口鼻口罩治疗高碳酸血症性呼吸衰竭患者行NIMV的疗效,并调查患者的口罩依从性。材料和方法:在这项前瞻性随机研究中,60例高碳酸血症性呼吸衰竭患者分为两组;全面罩组(n= 30)和口鼻面罩组(n= 30)。分别于治疗前、治疗第1、6、24、72小时测定动脉血气值和呼吸频率。分别于治疗后第1、6、24小时采用患者依从性量表(PCS)评价患者对治疗的依从性。结果:全面罩组8例因面罩-脸不匹配、幽闭恐惧症被排除,口鼻面罩组2例因持续性高碳酸血症被排除。全面罩组在治疗第1、24小时pH值改善(p= 0.042、p= 0.033),治疗第72小时PCO2值降低(p= 0.024)。两组患者依从性和呼吸频率无差异。全面罩组患者眼部烧灼感和眼压的主诉较高(p= 0.025),口鼻面罩组患者眼压溃疡发生率较高(p= 0.025)。结论:全面罩降低PCO2和改善pH值更大。使用全口罩时,压疮不太常见。在我们的研究中,两组患者的依从性没有差异。需要注意的是,对于依从性高的患者,选择全面罩会增加治疗高碳酸血症性呼吸衰竭的成功率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
9.10%
发文量
43
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信